Teleassessment in Ataxic Multiple Sclerosis

February 27, 2024 updated by: Güngör Beyza ÖZVAR, Hacettepe University

Comparison of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Scores With Face-to-Face and Tele-Assessment Methods in Ataxic Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Our aim is to compare ICARS and SARA scores with face-to-face and tele-assessment methods in ataxic multiple sclerosis patients.

The hypotheses on which this study is based are; H1: Tele-assessment and face-to-face assessment results of the ICARS differ in patients with ataxic MS.

H2: Tele-assessment and face-to-face assessment results of SARA differ in patients with Ataxic MS.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Patients will be evaluated both face-to-face and via tele-assessment (video conference call). In these evaluations, ICARS and SARA will be used. Face-to-face and tele-assessments will be applied on the same day, the order of administration will be decided by the randomization method, and a 10-minute rest will be given between the assessments.The interview will be recorded during the tele-assessment and a re-assessment will be made on the same recording 1 week later. Face-to-face assessment will be done as routinely done in the clinic. Face-to-face and tele-assessments will be made by 3 different assessors. Assessors will be blind to each other's assessment. All assessments will be carried out at Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Ataxic MS patients with inclusion criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be between the ages of 18-50 years
  • Being diagnosed with MS by a neurologist
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 3-5
  • EDSS pyramidal system score ≤ 3 and cerebellar functional system score ≥ 1
  • Being clinically stable for the last 3 months
  • agree to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having other systemic, orthopedic or neurological disease
  • Having a history of attacks in the last 3 months
  • having peripheral vestibular complaints
  • being mentally affected (Montreal Cognitive Rating Scale Score < 21)
  • severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale > 3)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Ataxic multiple sclerosis
In the study, those aged between 18-50 years, diagnosed with MS by a neurologist, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 3-5, EDSS pyramidal system score ≤ 3 and cerebellar functional system score ≥ 1, patients who have been clinically stable for the last 3 months and have agreed to participate in the study will be included.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICARS
Time Frame: up to 6 months
It will be used to assessment the severity of ataxia. ICARS consists of 4 sub-titles: posture and gait disorders, kinetic functions, speech disorders, and oculomotor disorders. The score range is in the range of 0-100, and higher scores indicate increased disease severity. It is a reliable and valid scale for ataxic MS patients. The assessment will take 20 minutes.
up to 6 months
SARA
Time Frame: up to 6 months
It will be used to assess the severity of ataxia. It is a scale that evaluates performance in 8 items as walking, standing, sitting, speech disorder, finger tracking, finger-nose test, rapid alternative hand movements, and heel-tibia test. The score range is 0-40, and an increase in the score indicates increased ataxia severity. It is a reliable and valid scale for ataxic MS patients. The assessment will take 15 minutes.
up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Being between Expanded Disability Status Scale 3-5 and having a pyramidal system score below 3 are among the inclusion criteria. At the beginning of the study, all patients will be evaluated for EDSS, and patients who do not meet the criteria will not be included in the study. The assessment will take 15 minutes. The EDSS ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability. EDSS steps 1.0 to 4.5 refer to people with MS who are able to walk without any aid. EDSS steps 5.0 to 9.5 are defined by the impairment to walking.
up to 6 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
It will be used in the cognitive status assessment. Montreal Cognitive Assessment < 21 is among the exclusion criteria. At the beginning of the study, all patients will be given a MOCA, and patients who do not meet the criteria will not be included in the study. It assesses different cognitive dimensions including attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuospatial skills, abstract thinking, calculation, and orientation. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 0, and the highest score is 30. Higher scores indicate a better cognitive levels. It is a reliable scale used for cognitive screening for MS patients. The assessment will take 10 minutes.
up to 6 months
Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 6 months
It will be used to assess patients' satisfaction of the tele assessment method. After the tele-assesment is over, the questionnaire will be applied. The questionnaire consists of 14 items and patients are asked to rate each item from 1 to 5. The lowest score is 14 and the highest score is 70. A higher score indicates a higher level of satisfaction. It is a reliable and valid questionnaire for MS patients.
up to 6 months
Telehealth Usability Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 6 months
It will be used to evaluate the usability of the teleassessment method by patients. After the tele-assesment is over, the questionnaire will be applied. The questionnaire consists of 21 items and patients are asked to rate each item from 1 to 7.The lowest score is 21 and the highest score is 147. A higher score indicates a higher level of usability. It is a reliable and valid questionnaire in MS patients.
up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hacettepe University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ender Ayvat, PhD, Hacettepe University
  • Study Director: Muhammed Kılınç, PhD, Hacettepe University
  • Principal Investigator: Fatma Ayvat, PhD, Hacettepe University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Tele-Assessment

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings