Optimal rTMS for Cognitive Deficits and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia

June 20, 2023 updated by: Shanghai Mental Health Center

Optimizing Treatment Protocol of High Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Cognitive Deficits and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: an Exploratory Study

Negative symptoms and cognition decline are major challenges in clinical management of schizophrenia. Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been highly involved in the mechanisms of negative symptoms and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. However, the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over left or bilateral DLPFC has not yet been well studied. The aim of this study is to describe how the effectiveness of rTMS over different targets for cognitive deficits and negative symptoms in schizophrenia will be evaluated. The study will provide evidence to determine whether a bilateral DLPFC rTMS and is more effective than a left DLPFC rTMS alone to optimize treatment protocol in schizophrenia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will be a randomized, double-blind trial comparing active rTMS over bilateral DLPFC vs. active rTMS over left DLPFC vs. sham rTMS delivered over DLPFC an 4-week treatment period. After assessment and inclusion into the study, participants will be randomized to receive up to 20 sessions of either active rTMS over left DLPFC or bilateral DLPFC or placebo treatments.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 20030
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Xuhui Mental Health Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Five Edition (DSM-V) diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and the diagnosis was verified by an experienced psychiatrist based on the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) 7.0 .
  • Age between 18 and 60.
  • Patients with prominently negative symptoms, which was defined as: PANSS negative subscore≥15 points and one of items N1-N7 scoring≥4.
  • All patients were in stable clinical conditions (reduction rate of PANSS score<10% within 4 weeks), stable antipsychotic treatment for at least 4 weeks, and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication for rTMS (e.g., intracranial metal, pacemakers, cochlear and intracranial hypertension).
  • Unstable clinical condition (e.g., being aggressive and uncooperative).
  • Current substance abuse.
  • Any other psychiatric diagnosis.
  • Significant medical condition including neurological disease, severe cardiovascular, hepatic, renal diseases.
  • Previous treatment with modified electric convulsive therapy (MECT) within 3 months before enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Active rTMS over bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Active rTMS over bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Participants will receive up to 20 rTMS sessions within the 4-week treatment period.
Device: Bilateral Active Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Active treatments with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) took the form of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). For iTBS the stimulation parameters were: frequency = triplet 50 Hz bursts, repeated at 5 Hz; train duration = 2 s ON and 8 s OFF, total pulses/session = 600; total number of treatments = 20(5 sessions per week) at 80 % of each side resting motor threshold (MT). The rTMS target was first randomized to the left or right DLPFC, then switched to the opposite side.
Active Comparator: Active rTMS over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Active rTMS over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and sham rTMS over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Participants will receive up to 20 rTMS sessions within the 4-week treatment period.
Device: Left Active Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Active treatments with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex(DLPFC) took the form of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). For iTBS the stimulation parameters were: frequency = triplet 50 Hz bursts, repeated at 5 Hz; train duration = 2 s ON and 8 s OFF, total pulses/session = 600; total number of treatments = 20(5 sessions per week) at 80 % of left resting motor threshold (MT). Sham rTMS stimulation was delivered over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex(DLPFC) using the same stimulation parameters, except for using the sham stimulation coil. The rTMS target was first randomized to the left or right DLPFC, then switched to the opposite side.
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS over bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Sham rTMS over bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Participants will receive up to 20 rTMS sessions within the 4-week treatment period.
Device: Sham rTMS over bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Sham rTMS stimulation was delivered over bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using the same stimulation parameters, except for using the sham stimulation coil. The rTMS target was first randomized to the left or right DLPFC, then switched to the opposite side.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Assessment of Negative Symptoms(SANS) Post Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
The Assessment of Negative Symptoms(SANS) is a standardized assessment utilizing a 6-point scale with which the clinician rates the degree to which the severity of the subject's negative symptoms. It consists of 19 items assessing five symptoms of the negative dimension: Affect flattening, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, and poor attention.
Baseline and 4 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Post Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Batteryis a standardized rating tool to assess the severity of the subject's cognitive symptoms, which consisted of seven domains and the total score: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, visual learning, verbal learning, reasoning/problem solving, and social cognition.
Baseline and 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale(PANSS)-Negative Symptoms Subscale Post Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale(PANSS)-Negative Subscale is a valid assessment utilizing a 7 items, 7-point scale with which the clinician rates the degree to which the severity of the subject's negative symptoms.
Baseline and 4 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Post Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) is a standardized assessment utilizing a single item, 7-point scale with which the clinician rates the severity of the subject's illness at the time of assessment relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis.
Baseline and 4 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Post Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) is a nine item structures interview scale, in which each item has a four point measure, which has been specifically developed to assess depression in schizophrenics.
Baseline and 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Mental Health Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Xuhui Mental Health Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yan Zhan, MD, Shanghai Xuhui Mental Health Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • XHJW2020KY003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings