Association Between ORA and Residual Refractive Astigmatism After SMILE
Association Between Preoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism(ORA) and Residual Refractive Astigmatism After SMILE Refractive Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan
- Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Corrected distance visual acuity of both eyes reaches 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR)
- Stable refractive errors of myopia and astigmatism who received SMILE refractive surgery of both eyes
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cataract
- Corneal opacities or irregularities
- Dry eye (Schirmer's test I ≤ 5mm)
- Amblyopia
- Coexisting ocular pathologies
- Glaucoma
- Non-dilating pupil
- History of intraocular surgery, laser therapy, or retinopathy
- Optic nerve or macular diseases
- Estimated postoperative cornea residual stromal thickness less than 250 μm
- Pregnancy or under lactation
- Uncontrolled diabetic mellitus or systemic immune disease _Refusal or unable to maintain follow-up
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Corrected distance visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
in LogMAR unit
|
3 months after surgery
|
|
Manifest refraction
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
in Diopter
|
3 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gyldenkerne A, Hjortdal J, Ivarsen A. Astigmatism prediction in small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Apr;46(4):524-533. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000083.
- Jun I, Kang DSY, Arba-Mosquera S, Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Jean SK, Kim EK, Seo KY, Lee HK, Kim TI. Comparison of clinical outcomes between vector planning and manifest refraction planning in SMILE for myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Aug;46(8):1149-1158. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000100.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 003 (033)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.