Patient Perspective Midline Catheter in the Emergency Department
Patient Perspective of Midline Catheters Versus Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IVs for Difficult IV Access in the ED
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Casey Glass
- Phone Number: 336-716-3638
- Email: cglass@wakehealth.edu
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient in the emergency department
- Failed 2 or more conventional attempts at vascular access *or*
- history of requiring US guided vascular access
- US Fellowship trained physician available
Exclusion Criteria:
- basilic vein access is contraindicated
- patient undergoing advanced resuscitation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV
Placement of 4-5cm angiocath under ultrasound guidance
|
Ultrasound guided vascular access with a peripheral IV catheter
|
|
Experimental: Ultrasound Guided Midline Catheter
Placement of 10-15cm midline catheter under ultrasound guidance
|
Ultrasound guided vascular access with a midline IV catheter
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction with Procedure
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure/Baseline
|
Score describes a patient's satisfaction with a healthcare decision.
It measures satisfaction across 6 domains via 6 questions scored on a 5 point scale.
Score ranges from 6 to 30.
A low score signifies dissatisfaction, a high score signifies high satisfaction.
|
Immediately after procedure/Baseline
|
|
Patient Satisfaction with Procedure
Time Frame: At 48 Hours Post Baseline
|
Score describes a patient's satisfaction with a healthcare decision.
It measures satisfaction across 6 domains via 6 questions scored on a 5 point scale.
Score ranges from 6 to 30.
A low score signifies dissatisfaction, a high score signifies high satisfaction.
|
At 48 Hours Post Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of needle punctures in a 24 hour period (patient reported)
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
|
Duration of Successful Access
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
IV/Cath dwell time in hours
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
Number of Needle Sticks
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
Prior to gaining successful access
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
Number of Insertion Attempts
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
For ultrasound guided access
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
Emergency Department (ED) Length of Stay
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
in hours
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
in hours
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: immediately post intervention/baseline and at 48 hours past baseline
|
this is a single question measuring satisfaction with the intervention overall on a Likert Scale 1-10,
|
immediately post intervention/baseline and at 48 hours past baseline
|
|
Number of Insertion Related Complications
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
Includes failed attempts, arterial punctures, infiltrations, hematoma formations
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
Number of Dwell Related Complications
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
Includes inability to flush, catheter dislodgement, leakage around the catheter site, insertion site erythema, insertion site pain, drainage from catheter, edema, ecchymosis, superficial thrombosis, Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), line associated infection, vesicant extravasation, skin necrosis, neurovascular injury, arterial injury
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
Time to Access
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
|
minutes from procedure start to procedure completion
|
up to 24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Casey Glass, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00089914
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.