Testing the SNOWDROP Intervention: Using a Clinical Decision Support System and Patient Portal for Falls Prevention Among Older Patients in Primary Care (SNOWDROP)
Seniors Empowered Via Big Data to Joint-manage Their Medication-related Risk of Falling in Primary Care
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Leonie Westerbeek
- Phone Number: +31 (0)20 525 3680
- Email: l.westerbeek@uva.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Huisartsenpraktijken
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 70 years or older
- High fall risk
- Takes at least 1 Fall Risk Increasing Drug (FRID)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention condition
|
A Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that calculates older patients' personalized fall risk and provides the GP with advice on how to adjust the patient's medication in order to lower the fall risk.
A patient portal that provides general information on falls and fall risk to the older patients and helps the patient to prepare for the consultation by filling out a Question Prompt List (QPL).
The QPL is a list of possibly relevant questions and topics from which the patient can select those that are important to him/her.
These will already be sent to the GP before the consultation takes place.
|
|
No Intervention: Control condition
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Shared decision making
Time Frame: During consultation
|
This concerns the extent to which shared decision making between patient and GP during the consultation.
This will be assessed using the Observer OPTION Multiple Chronic Conditions (OPTION-MCC).
Consultation are audiotaped and will be coded on shared decision making using this coding scheme.
|
During consultation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; patient portal)
Time Frame: At baseline & two weeks after consultation
|
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) measures the adoption of a new technology/system based on user attitudes in relation to the patient portal.
|
At baseline & two weeks after consultation
|
|
Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS; patient portal)
Time Frame: At baseline & two weeks after consultation
|
The Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS) measures satisfaction with comprehensibility, satisfaction with attractiveness, and satisfaction with emotional support, in relation to the patient portal.
|
At baseline & two weeks after consultation
|
|
Patient portal usage
Time Frame: At baseline & two weeks after consultation
|
Patients are asked if they used the patient portal and which components they used.
|
At baseline & two weeks after consultation
|
|
Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ)
Time Frame: Baseline & two weeks after consultation
|
The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire measures beliefs about the necessity of medication and concerns about medication.
|
Baseline & two weeks after consultation
|
|
Netherlands Patient Information Recall Questionnaire (NPIRQ)
Time Frame: Two weeks after consultation
|
The Netherlands Patient Information Recall Questionnaire consists of open questions measuring patients' recall of what was discussed and decided during the consultation.
|
Two weeks after consultation
|
|
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
Time Frame: Two weeks after consultation
|
The decisional conflict scale measures decisional conflict after the consultation related to five subscales: feeling informed, uncertainty, values clarity, support, and effective decision making.
|
Two weeks after consultation
|
|
Changes in medication
Time Frame: Baseline & two weeks after the consultation
|
Changes in prescriptions of the medication as reported in the electronic health record.
|
Baseline & two weeks after the consultation
|
|
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; CDSS)
Time Frame: After the first consultation (study beginning) and after the last consultation (study completion after +/- 7 months)
|
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) measures the adoption of a new technology/system based on user attitudes in relation to the CDSS to be answered by the GP.
This is assessed by measuring Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Intention to use.
|
After the first consultation (study beginning) and after the last consultation (study completion after +/- 7 months)
|
|
The Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS; CDSS)
Time Frame: After the first consultation (study beginning) and after the last consultation (study completion after +/- 7 months)
|
The Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS) measures satisfaction with comprehensibility, satisfaction with attractiveness, and satisfaction with emotional support, in relation to the CDSS to be answered by the GP.
|
After the first consultation (study beginning) and after the last consultation (study completion after +/- 7 months)
|
|
Evaluation of the consultation
Time Frame: Immediately after each consultation
|
Four items to assess the consultation to be answered by the GP.
The items assess to what extent the patient was representative, their opinion on the communication during the consultation, the extent to which they are satisfied with any decisions made and the difficulty of the consultation.
|
Immediately after each consultation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Julia C.M. van Weert, Amsterdam School for Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022-PC-15274
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.