Evaluating Pulse Oximetry Bias in Children With Darker Skin Pigmentation

March 29, 2024 updated by: Christopher Almond, Stanford University

Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Pulse Oximeters in Children With Darker Skin Pigmentation

In this prospective study, the investigators will enroll 154 children with arterial lines to determine the accuracy of pulse oximeters in children with darker skin pigmentation. Studies in adults suggest pulse oximeters may overestimate the true level of oxygenation in the blood as measured directly by co-oximetry. However, pediatric data are relatively limited. This study, which is funded by the FDA through the Stanford-UCSF (University of California San Francisco) Clinical Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) Program, will determine if the error/bias is associated with skin pigmentation and whether the error falls outside FDA standards. The broader purpose of the study is to work toward eliminating health disparities.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

As a conventional patient vital sign, pulse oximetry is used widely to determine whether a patient is adequately oxygenated. However, studies suggest that peripheral pulse oximetry (Sp02) systematically overestimates the true arterial oxygen saturation (Sa02) in patients with darker skin pigmentation. This error or bias places patients with darker skin pigmentation at considerable risk by failing to detect important levels of hypoxemia that drive critical treatment decisions like medication usage for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-COV-2 (COVID) infection, hospital admission, ICU transfer and intubation. Except for the original description of the problem published by Bickler and colleagues in 2005, most studies (including one pediatric study) have been limited to retrospective studies where the racial/ethnic category is used as a proxy for skin pigmentation, so-called "paired" oximetry measurements may be separated by several minutes where the oxygen saturation can readily change, and important technical factors such a perfusion quality, motion artifact, and light transmittance are not reliably documented. This information is critical because emerging studies suggest that perfusion effects, as measured by the perfusion index (PI), may account for much of the error observed in patients with darker pigmentation. The limitations of prior studies can be readily overcome with a prospective study where skin pigmentation is measured objectively and at the location of the oximeter sensor, SpO2/SaO2 (arterial oxygen saturation) measurements are collected nearly simultaneously while at steady state, and technical factors such as perfusion status, transmittance, and temperature can be accurately recorded. This study will enroll 154 children at Stanford's Lucile Packard Children's Hospital to determine whether the mean bias (error) in FDA-cleared pulse oximeters increases with darker skin pigmentation, and whether this error falls outside of the FDA standard of 3%. The primary study hypothesis is that in children ≤21 years of age managed in a real-world hospital setting, the mean bias (error) in FDA-cleared pulse oximeters increases with increased skin pigmentation as measured by colorimetry and standard pigmentation scales (Fitzpatrick and von Luschan pigmentation scales). The secondary hypothesis is that the mean bias is mitigated when technical factors like perfusion index are accounted for in adjusted models. Data generated from this study will help to identify the impact of darker skin pigmentation on medical device performance in the pediatric population and ultimately help eliminate health disparities.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
154

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Recruiting
        • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 17 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All children ≤21 years of age receiving care at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital and who require an arterial vascular access catheter as part of their clinical care will be eligible for inclusion in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≤21 years of age
  2. Requires arterial vascular access as part of routine clinical care
  3. Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anemia defined as a Hgb <8 g/dL
  2. Methemoglobinemia or carbon monoxide poisoning where the SpO2 is known to be inaccurate
  3. Skin condition, such as epidermolysis bullosa, where pulse oximetry not expected to be accurate, or application of skin probes is medically inadvisable
  4. Non-pulsatile patients (e.g., left ventricular assist device (LVAD), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
  5. Lack of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Pulse Oximetry Observational Cohort
Diagnostic test: Pulse Oximeter (Massimo)
The Massimo LNCS (low noise cabled sensors) pulse oximeter will be used to estimate the oxygen saturation and compared to the gold standard, the arterial oxygen saturation in the blood as measured by co-oximetry. The pulse oximeters is FDA cleared for this purpose so patients will not be exposed to any interventions that are not standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Saturation by pulse oximetry (Sp02)
Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks after consent and arterial line placement (where Sp02 will be compared to simultaneous measurements of the Sa02, or oxygen saturation using blood from the artery)
Oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry
Up to 2 weeks after consent and arterial line placement (where Sp02 will be compared to simultaneous measurements of the Sa02, or oxygen saturation using blood from the artery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of California, San Francisco
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 31, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SU_IRB_66947

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings