Microfracture at Proximal Humerus Lateral to Footprint Could Enhance the Rotator Cuff Healing

November 17, 2022 updated by: Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University

Randomized Controlled Trial of Patients Treated With and Without Lateralized Microfracture During Rotator Cuff Repair

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether there is any effect on rotator cuff healing by making microfracture at the lateral side of the footprint. The main question it aims to answer are:

  • [whether the lateralized microfracture could decrease the retear rate after arthroscopy rotator cuff repair.]
  • [whether the lateralized microfracture could improve the functional recovery after arthroscopy rotator cuff repair.] Participants with medium to larger size rotator cuff tears will be randomly assigned to the study group treated with lateralized microfracture immediately after arthroscopy rotator cuff repair or the control group treated with conventional arthroscopy rotator cuff repair without microfracture.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
88

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Mingbing Xiao, Ph.D
  • Phone Number: +86051381162222
  • Email: tdfykjc@163.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 226001
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
        • Contact:
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 226001
        • Recruiting
        • Afiliated Hospital of Nantong University
        • Contact:
          • Mingbing Xiao, MD
          • Phone Number: +86051385052222

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Medium to large Rotator cuff tear(1cm-5cm) diagnosed by MRI
  2. Patients can complete the follow-up and comply with all post-operative rehab instructions
  3. Failure of non-operative treatment for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Revision rotator cuff surgery
  2. Partial thickness rotator cuff tears
  3. Small (less than 1cm) and Massive (greater than 5cm) rotator cuff tears
  4. Disease history of the affected shoulder
  5. Systemic immune diseases
  6. Irreparable rotator cuff tear

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Lateralized microfracture group
Participants with medium to larger size rotator cuff tears will be treated with arthroscopy rotator cuff repair with microfracture at the lateral side of the footprint immediately.
Procedure: Lateralised microfracture
making microfracture(4 holes with 2mm diameter) at the lateral side of the footprint right after arthroscopy rotator repair.
No Intervention: No microfracture group
Participants with medium to larger size rotator cuff tears will be treated with arthroscopy rotator cuff repair without microfracture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: 24 months postoperative
The scans were evaluated for rotator cuff integrity and degree of re-tears (no re-tears, partial or complete re-tear) by an independent radiologist
24 months postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Active range of motion of Shoulder
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative
Active forward flexion, abduction and external rotation will be measured with a manual goniometer at the preoperative visit, 3 months and 24 months after surgery.
Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative
Passive range of motion of Shoulder
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative
Passive forward flexion, abduction and external rotation will be measured with a manual goniometer at the preoperative visit, 3 months and 24 months after surgery.
Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative
American Shoulder and Elbow Score
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative
American Shoulder and Elbow scores (minimum 0 points, maximum 100 points, higher values are considered better outcomes) of patients with rotator cuff tears treated with and without lateralized microfracture at the preoperative visit, 3 months and 24 months after surgery.
Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative
University at California at Los Angeles Shouder Rating Scale
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative
University at California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale(minimum 3 points, maximum 35 points, higher values are considered better outcomes) of patients with rotator cuff tears treated with and without lateralized microfracture at the preoperative visit, 3 months and 24 months after surgery.
Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative
Visual Analog Scale for Pain
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative
Visual Analog Scale for Pain(minimum 0 points, maximum 10 points, higher values are considered worse outcomes) of patients with rotator cuff tears treated with and without lateralized microfracture at the preoperative visit, 3 months, and 24 months after surgery.
Preoperative, 3 months and 24 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yucheng Sun, Ph.D, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • micorfracture

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings