Guselkumab vs Golimumab in PsA TNF Inadequate Responder Patients (EVOLUTION)

October 8, 2025 updated by: University of Pennsylvania

Guselkumab vs Golimumab in PsA TNF Inadequate Responder Patients: a Pragmatic Trial (EVOLUTION)

The trial is an open-label randomized study that will examine whether switching to a selective IL23 inhibitor (guselkumab) is more effective than switching to a second TNFi (golimumab) among patients with PsA who have an inadequate response to a TNFi.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary aim of the trial will be to determine, among psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with an inadequate response (IR) to a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), whether switching to a new mechanism of action (MOA), specifically guselkumab (GUS), a selective interleukin 23 inhibitor (IL23i) targeting the p19 subunit, is more effective than switching to another TNFi. The primary hypothesis of this study is that switching to a new MOA may be more effective than switching to a second TNFi. This will be the first trial to test such a switch in PsA patients. Additionally, the proposed study will address the effectiveness of a new therapy, GUS, in a clinical practice setting among patients who are TNF IR.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
63

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Loxahatchee Groves, Florida, United States, 33470
      • Plant City, Florida, United States, 33563
      • Riverview, Florida, United States, 33569
        • Recruiting
        • Southwest Florida Rheumatology
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shanmugapriya Reddy, MD
        • Contact:
    • Georgia
      • Lilburn, Georgia, United States, 30047
    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • Recruiting
        • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Karen Salomon-Escoto, MD
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
        • Recruiting
        • University Of Nebraska Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ted Mikuls, MD
        • Contact:
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • New York University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Soumya Reddy, MD
        • Contact:
    • Ohio
      • Blue Ash, Ohio, United States, 45242
      • Wheelersburg, Ohio, United States, 45694
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
      • Crossville, Tennessee, United States, 38555
        • Recruiting
        • Cumberland Rheumatology
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sivalingam Kanagasegar, MD
        • Contact:
    • Texas
      • Colleyville, Texas, United States, 76034
        • Recruiting
        • Heritage Rheumatology and Arthritis Care
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dhiman Basu, MD
        • Contact:
      • El Paso, Texas, United States, 79902
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • Recruiting
        • University of Utah
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jessica Walsh, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Psoriatic arthritis meeting CASPAR criteria;
  2. Active psoriatic arthritis defined by at least 1 swollen joint;
  3. cDAPSA score ≥ 10; See also Exclusion #4 - cDAPSA must be > 14 in patients without psoriasis.
  4. Using a TNFi or previously used a single TNFi historically and either never responded or lost response (TNF IR) and planning to switch to a new biologic therapy;
  5. If using an oral small molecule/csDMARD (i.e., methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, or apremilast), must be on a stable dose for 4 weeks and remain on a stable dose during the study; Use of up to two OSM/csDMARDs is allowed.
  6. If using NSAIDs, glucocorticoids (<10 mg daily) or topical medications for psoriasis, must be on a stable dose for 4 weeks prior to Screening/Baseline 1 and remain on a stable dose during the study;
  7. Age 18-80 (patients older than 80 may be more likely to have concomitant osteoarthritis which may make it difficult to assess whether symptoms are related to PsA vs OA).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior exposure to golimumab or another non-TNFi biologic (IL12/23i, JAKi, an IL17i, or an IL23i); prior exposure to a TYK2i is acceptable, but cannot be used during course of the study;
  2. An adverse event that precludes use of another TNFi (development of drug-induced SLE, allergic reaction, serious infection, heart failure symptoms, demyelination at any point during use of therapy) or any other contraindication or substantial intolerance to a TNFi;
  3. Use of moderate to high dose glucocorticoids (>10 mg);

  4. Already meets the primary endpoint at Baseline; [cDAPSA low disease activity ≤ 14; IGA of psoriasis 0/1] In patients with psoriasis, cDAPSA can be 10-14 IF the Investigator Global Assessment of Psoriasis ≥ 2.

    In patients without psoriasis, cDAPSA must be > 14 to meet eligibility requirements.

  5. Currently pregnant or actively trying to conceive.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Guselkumab 100mg q4w
Guselkumab (GUS) 100mg every 4 weeks
Drug: Guselkumab
Guselkumab (GUS) subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • Tremfya
Experimental: Guselkumab 100mg q8w
Guselkumab (GUS) 100mg every 8 weeks
Drug: Guselkumab
Guselkumab (GUS) subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • Tremfya
Active Comparator: Golimumab 50mg q4w
Golimumab (GOL) 50mg every 4 weeks
Drug: Golimumab
Golimumab (GOL) subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • Simponi

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achievement of cDAPSA low disease activity
Time Frame: 12 Months
Clinical Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA): a combination score of tender joint count, swollen joint count, patient assessment of pain, and patient global assessment of disease activity. Scale from 0-154 where higher figures indicate worse status. Remission is considered ≤4 and low disease activity >4 to ≤13.
12 Months
Investigator Global Assessment of Psoriasis of Clear or Almost Clear
Time Frame: 12 Months
Investigator global assessment (IGA) of psoriasis. A scale of 0-4 where higher figures indicate worse status. (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) using PSAID-12
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) defines a satisfactory state of disease activity that includes 5 domains of PsA. 5/7 of the following criteria must be satisfied for MDA: patient global ≤ 2 (0-10), patient pain ≤ 2 (0-10), PSAID-12 <4 (0-10), TJC (Tender Joint Count) ≤ 1, SJC (Swollen Joint Count) ≤ 1, BSA (Body Surface Area) ≤ 3, and Leeds Enthesitis Index ≤ 1.
6 and 12 months
Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) using HAQ-DI
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
(MDA) Minimal Disease Activity defines a satisfactory state of disease activity that includes 5 domains of PsA. Participant would need to achieve 5/7 of the following criteria: patient global ≤ 2 (0-10), patient pain ≤ 2 (0-10), HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index) < 0.5 (0-3), TJC (Tender Joint Count) ≤ 1, SJC (Swollen Joint Count) ≤ 1, BSA (Body Surface Area) ≤ 3, and Leeds Enthesitis Index ≤ 1.
6 and 12 months
Change in PSAID-12
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease Questionnaire 12-item questionnaire (PSAID-12) Survey. The range of the final PsAID-12 value is 0-10 where higher figures indicate worse status. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement in disease activity.
6 and 12 months
PSAID-12 < 4
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease Questionnaire 12-item questionnaire (PSAID-12) Survey. The range of the final PsAID-12 value is 0-10 where higher figures indicate worse status.
6 and 12 months
Change in DLQI
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a measure of skin disease activity. Calculated score of 0-30 where higher figures indicate worse status.Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement in disease activity.
6 and 12 months
IGA Among Patients with BSA > 3% at Baseline
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Investigator global assessment (IGA) of psoriasis among patients with BSA (Body Surface Area) >3% at baseline. A scale of 0-4 where higher figures indicate worse status. (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
6 and 12 months
IGA Among Patients with IGA ≥ 2 at Baseline
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Investigator global assessment (IGA) of psoriasis among patients with IGA of 2 or more (≥ 2) at baseline. A scale of 0-4 where higher figures indicate worse status. (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
6 and 12 months
Change in Promis Fatigue
Time Frame: 6 and 12 Months
Promis Fatigue is a measure of fatigue with a score from 8-40 where higher figures indicate worse status. A negative change indicates less overall fatigue.
6 and 12 Months
Resolution of Dactylitis
Time Frame: 6 and 12 Months
Dactylitis is assessed using a scoring system from 0 to 3 (0-no dactylitis, 1-mild dactylitis, 2-moderate dactylitis, and 3-severe dactylitis) for each digit. These results are summed to produce a final score ranging from 0 to 20. A higher score indicates more severe dactylitis. Resolution of dactylitis is defined as a dactylitis score of 0 with a baseline dactylitis score >0.
6 and 12 Months
Resolution of Enthesitis
Time Frame: 6 and 12 Months
Enthesitis is assessed using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). This measure includes the following entheses: left and right lateral epicondyle humerus, left and right medial femoral condyle, and left and right achilles tendon insertion. The total LEI score of 0-6 is based on evaluating each of these six sites as 0 or 1 based on the absence or presence of pain/tenderness. Resolution of enthesitis is defined as a enthesitis score of 0 with a baseline enthesitis score >0.
6 and 12 Months
Change in BASDAI
Time Frame: 6 and 12 Months
Change in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) among patients with axial disease. The BASDAI sum score ranges from 0 to 10 and higher values indicate more active disease. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement in disease activity.
6 and 12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pennsylvania

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alexis Ogdie-Beatty, MD, MSCE, University of Pennsylvania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 14, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CNTO1959PSA3006

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings