Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: a Cohort

December 27, 2022 updated by: Yanhong Deng, Sun Yat-sen University

Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: a Prospective Observational Cohort

The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term oncology outcomes and specimen quality of taTME and laTME in the treatment of middle and low rectal cancer by a large sample cohort. At the same time, the local recurrence following a primary rectal cancer resection was analyzed to respond to the concerns about the event of the national suspension for TaTME due to the high local recurrence rate in Norway.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic surgery is considered to have better visualization for more accurate separation and further injury reduction than open surgery. However, the oncology outcomes are still controversial. Especially in the challenging patients who have narrow and deep pelvic, the disadvantage that it is difficult to obtain high-quality resected specimens during laparoscopic TME (laTME) surgery is considered to be magnified. It is considered transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is an alternative method to solve this "old problem". However, as a new technology that has been around for only 10 years, the applicability of taTME worldwide needs to be further proved in long-term oncology. This prospective cohort study aimed to compare taTME surgery to laTME surgery for mid and low-rectal cancer on long-term oncology outcomes from a single, experienced Chinese center that was an early adopter of taTME.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2502

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Low-mid rectal cancer within Stage III.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 and 80 years old
  2. Confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma cancer pathologically
  3. Tumor location ≦ 12 cm from the anal margin
  4. Willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Distant metastasis before surgery
  2. More than one colorectal tumor at diagnosis
  3. Familial adenomatous polyposis
  4. Recurrent rectal cancer
  5. Undergo transanal minimally invasive surgery
  6. Undergo palliative treatment
  7. Undergo emergency surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
taTME
patients who underwent transanal total mesorectal excision
Procedure: transanal total mesorectal excision
transanal TME
Other Names:
  • laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
laTME
patients who underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall survival rate
Time Frame: 5 years after the surgery
5 years after the surgery
disease-free survival ratev
Time Frame: 5 years after the surgery
5 years after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local recurrence rate
Time Frame: 3 years after the surgery
Local recurrence was defined as radiologic or histopathologic evidence of any recurrent disease deposit located in the pelvis in the prior area of dissection following a primary rectal cancer resection, with or without distal metastasis
3 years after the surgery
Cancer special survival rate
Time Frame: 5 years after the surgery
Cancer special survival was defined as the time from the date of primary rectal cancer resection to the date of death caused by rectal cancer.
5 years after the surgery
Quality of the mesorectum specimen
Time Frame: 30 days after the surgery
The quality of the resected mesorectum was classified into three grades: (a) incomplete, (b) nearly complete, and (c) complete
30 days after the surgery
CRM status
Time Frame: 30 days after the surgery
The CRM was regarded as positive if the tumor distance or malignant lymph node to CRM was ≦1 mm.
30 days after the surgery
DRM status
Time Frame: 30 days after the surgery
The DRM was regarded as positive if it was microscopically involved by or ≦1 mm from the tumor margins.
30 days after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Liang Kang, Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 27, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GIHSYSU-32

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

The data can be obtained with a proper request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings