Millipede AspiRation for Revascularization in Stroke (MARRS) Study (MARRS)

June 12, 2026 updated by: Perfuze
The objectives of the study are to examine the performance and safety characteristics of the Millipede System when used for revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to Large Vessel Occlusions (LVOs) and to record associated clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Ischemic stroke is a life-threatening condition. Annually, approximately 795,000 people in the United States have a stroke.

The MARRS study is an interventional, open label, single arm, multi center, prospective clinical investigation. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the performance and safety characteristics of the Millipede System in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke due to LVOs and to record clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
235

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • CHU Bordeaux
      • Montpellier, France
        • CHU Montpellier
      • Nancy, France
        • CHRU de Nancy
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes - HGRL
      • Strasbourg, France, 67200
        • CHRU Strasbourg
      • Toulouse, France
        • Toulouse University Hospital -CHU Purpan
  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Vall d'Hebron
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale University Hospital
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
        • Baptist Health Research Institute
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Tampa General Hosital
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • EMORY
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14620
        • University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC)
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43614
        • University of Toledo
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43606
        • ProMedica Toledo Hospital
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43608
        • Mercy Health
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38120
        • Semmes Murphey Foundation
    • Texas
      • Harlingen, Texas, United States, 78550
        • Valley Baptist Medical Center
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77225
        • UT Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 85 years.
  2. Pre-stroke mRS score of ≤ 1.
  3. Baseline NIHSS score of ≥ 6.
  4. A new focal disabling neurologic deficit consistent with acute cerebral ischemia.
  5. Evidence of a large vessel occlusion of the intracranial ICA (including T or L occlusions), the M1 or M2 segments of the MCA, the intracranial vertebral artery, or the basilar artery on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA).

  6. Subject belongs to one of the following subgroups:

    1. Subject is ineligible for thrombolytic therapy, OR
    2. Subject is eligible for thrombolytic therapy and thrombolytic therapy was administered without delay and per current practice guidelines.

  7. For strokes in the anterior circulation, the following imaging criteria should be met:

    1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) criterion: volume of diffusion restriction visually assessed as ≤ 50 mL, or Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 6-10; OR
    2. Computed Tomography (CT) criterion: Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 6-10 on baseline CT or Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA)- source images, or volume of significantly lowered relative Cerebral Blood Flow (rCBF) <30% (volume of ≤ 50 mL if CT perfusion is performed).
  8. For strokes in the posterior circulation, the following imaging criterion should be met: pcASPECTS score 8 to 10 on baseline CT, CTA-source images, or Diffusion- Weighted Imaging (DWI) MRI.
  9. The interventionalist estimates that arterial puncture can be completed within 8 hours of onset/last known well.
  10. Informed consent obtained in accordance with the applicable country-specific regulations and as approved by the IRB/ REC.
  11. Angiographic confirmation of a single large vessel occlusion (mTICI of 0-1) of the intracranial ICA (including T or L occlusions), the M1 or M2 segments of the MCA, the intracranial vertebral artery, or the basilar artery that is accessible to the Millipede System.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known previous stroke within the past 3 months.
  2. Females who are known to be pregnant or breastfeeding.
  3. In the Investigator's opinion, any known comorbidity (including COVID-19) that may complicate treatment or prevent improvement or follow-up.
  4. Subject currently participating in or has previously participated in another trial involving an investigational device or drug within 30 days of enrollment.
  5. Known history of severe contrast allergy.
  6. Pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological or functional evaluation.
  7. Life expectancy of less than 6 months prior to stroke onset.
  8. Known cocaine use at time of treatment.
  9. Known history of coagulation factor deficiency or oral anti-coagulant therapy with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of more than 3.0.
  10. Known history of treatment with heparin within 48 hours with a Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) more than two times the laboratory normal.
  11. Known history of treatment with a direct thrombin inhibitor within 48 hours with a PTT more than 1.5 times the laboratory normal.
  12. Known glucose level< 50 mg/dl (2.78 mmol/L) or > 400 mg/dl (22.20 mmol/L).
  13. Known platelet count <50,000/µL.
  14. Clinical history, past imaging or clinical judgement suggest that the intracranial occlusion is chronic.
  15. For all patients, severe sustained hypertension with SBP >220 mmHg and/or DBP >120 mmHg; for patients treated with thrombolytic therapy, sustained hypertension despite treatment with SBP >185 mmHg and/or DBP > 110 mmHg.
  16. Renal failure with serum creatinine ≥3 mg/dL or Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <30 mL/min.
  17. Ongoing seizure due to stroke.
  18. Initially treated with intra-arterial thrombolytics or a different neurothrombectomy device before use of the Millipede System.
  19. Clinical symptoms of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
  20. Known history of cerebral vasculitis.
  21. Evidence of active systemic infection (e.g. septicemia). Exceptions: common cold, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV).
  22. Any known hemorrhagic or coagulation deficiency.
  23. Evidence of current intracranial hemorrhage on imaging.
  24. Significant mass effect with midline shift.
  25. Known arterial condition in a proximal vessel that requires treatment or prevents access to the site of occlusion or safe recovery of the investigational device (for example, severe stenosis, complete occlusion in the cervical ICA, tandem occlusion).
  26. Suspicion or evidence of aortic dissection, septic embolus, or bacterial endocarditis.
  27. Evidence of dissection in the extracranial or intracranial cerebral arteries.
  28. Excessive arterial tortuosity that may preclude device placement as determined by CTA/Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and/or conventional angiography.
  29. Evidence of multiple vascular occlusions (e.g., bilateral anterior circulation, anterior/posterior circulation, concurrent occlusions in the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and MCA, other concurrent ipsilateral occlusions in the same or different territories).
  30. CT or MRI showing mass effect or intracranial tumor (apart from small meningioma, ≤ 2 cm in diameter).
  31. Known cancer with metastases.
  32. Known aneurysm at or near the target treatment segment.
  33. Angiographic evidence of known or suspected underlying intracranial vasculopathy or atherosclerotic lesions responsible for the target occlusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Single Arm
Millipede System
Device: Millipede System
Mechanical thrombectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ITT Cohort: Rate of Core Lab-adjudicated Reperfusion Success Within Three Passes
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with successful reperfusion, defined as achieving a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebrovascular Infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater within ≤3 passes with the Millipede System without additional therapy. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b under these criteria as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
ITT Cohort: Primary Safety Outcome
Time Frame: From Day 0 (procedure) through to the 90 Day visit.
All AEs will be analyzed, with specific attention to the rate of all intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), non-hemorrhagic AEs capable of producing neurological deterioration, and death.
From Day 0 (procedure) through to the 90 Day visit.
ITT Cohort: Supplementary Analysis of Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with successful reperfusion, defined as achieving a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebrovascular Infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater within 3 passes of Millipede System without additional therapy, and where use of any additional therapy after achieving mTICI ≥b with the Millipede System is defined as failure. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b under these criteria as adjudicated by an independent core lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Rate of Core Lab-adjudicated Reperfusion Success Within Three Passes
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with successful reperfusion, defined as achieving a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebrovascular Infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater within ≤3 passes with the Millipede System without additional therapy. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b under these criteria as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Primary Safety Outcome
Time Frame: From Day 0 (procedure) through to the 90 Day visit.
All AEs will be analyzed, with specific attention to the rate of all intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), non-hemorrhagic AEs capable of producing neurological deterioration, and death.
From Day 0 (procedure) through to the 90 Day visit.
PP Cohort: Supplementary Analysis of Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with successful reperfusion, defined as achieving a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebrovascular Infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater within 3 passes of Millipede System without additional therapy, and where use of any additional therapy after achieving mTICI ≥b with the Millipede System is defined as failure. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b under these criteria as adjudicated by an independent core lab.
Intraprocedural

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ITT Cohort: Rate of Functional Independence
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure

The proportion of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, evaluated by certified assessors.

The mRS scale ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe disability), with an additional category of 6 for death.
90 days post-procedure
ITT Cohort: Rate of All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure
Proportion of subjects that died within 90 days of the procedure
90 days post-procedure
ITT Cohort: Rate of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (sICH)
Time Frame: 24-hours post-procedure
Rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), as independently adjudicated by the Core Lab and Clinical Events Committee
24-hours post-procedure
ITT Cohort: Rate of All Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH)
Time Frame: 24 hours post-procedure
Proportion of subjects with any ICH at 24 hours, as adjudicated by the Core Lab
24 hours post-procedure
ITT Cohort: Rate of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs)
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure
Proportion of subjects experiencing one or more SADEs within 90 days post-procedure, as adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee
90 days post-procedure
ITT Cohort: Rate of Procedure-Related Serious Adverse Events (PRSAEs)
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure
Proportion of subjects experiencing one or more procedure-related serious adverse events within 90 days post-procedure, as adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee
90 days post-procedure
ITT Cohort: Rate of Embolization to New Territory (ENT)
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with distal emboli on final angiography, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab
Intraprocedural
ITT Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Successful Reperfusion at End of the Thrombectomy Procedure
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2b at the end of the procedure. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b at the end of the procedure, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
ITT Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Complete or Near Complete Reperfusion at End of the Thrombectomy Procedure
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2c at the end of the procedure. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2c at the end of the procedure, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
ITT Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Successful Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede System
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede System. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede System, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
ITT Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Complete or Near Complete Reperfusion at the End of the First Pass With the Millipede System
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede System. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede System, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Rate of Functional Independence
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure

The proportion of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, evaluated by certified assessors.

The mRS scale ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe disability), with an additional category of 6 for death.
90 days post-procedure
PP Cohort: Rate of All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure
Proportion of subjects that died within 90 days of the procedure
90 days post-procedure
PP Cohort: Rate of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (sICH)
Time Frame: 24-hours post-procedure
Rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), as independently adjudicated by the Core Lab and Clinical Events Committee
24-hours post-procedure
PP Cohort: Rate of All Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH)
Time Frame: 24 hours post-procedure
Proportion of subjects with any ICH at 24 hours, as adjudicated by the Core Lab
24 hours post-procedure
PP Cohort: Rate of Embolization to New Territory (ENT)
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with distal emboli on final angiography, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Successful Reperfusion at End of the Thrombectomy Procedure
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2b at the end of the procedure. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b at the end of the procedure, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Complete or Near Complete Reperfusion at End of the Thrombectomy Procedure
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2c at the end of the procedure. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2c at the end of the procedure, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Successful Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede System
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede System. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede System, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Complete or Near Complete Reperfusion at the End of the First Pass With the Millipede System
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede System. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede System, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ITT Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Successful Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede 088 Catheter
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
ITT Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Near Complete or Complete Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede 088 Catheter
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
ITT Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With M1 Occlusions Achieving Successful Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede 088 Catheter
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with M1 occlusions achieving mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants with M1 occlusions who achieved mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
ITT Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With M1 Occlusions Achieving Near Complete or Complete Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede 088 Catheter
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with M1 occlusions achieving mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants with M1 occlusions who achieved mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Successful Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede 088 Catheter
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With Near Complete or Complete Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede 088 Catheter
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants who achieved mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With M1 Occlusions Achieving Successful Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede 088 Catheter
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with M1 occlusions achieving mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants with M1 occlusions who achieved mTICI ≥2b after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural
PP Cohort: Proportion of Subjects With M1 Occlusions Achieving Near Complete or Complete Reperfusion After the First Pass With the Millipede 088 Catheter
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of subjects with M1 occlusions achieving mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter. The mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion: 0 = no perfusion, 1 = minimal perfusion, 2a = partial (<50%), 2b = substantial (≥50%), 2c = near complete, 3 = complete. This measure reports the number of participants with M1 occlusions who achieved mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the Millipede 088 Catheter, as adjudicated by an independent Core Lab.
Intraprocedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Perfuze

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Raul Nogueira, MD, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, USA
  • Principal Investigator: Marc Ribo, MD, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
  • Principal Investigator: Ricardo Hanel, MD, Baptist Health Research Institute, Jacksonville, USA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 8, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 12, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CLIN040

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings