COMPARISON OF SECTIONAL MATRIX VERSUES CIRCUMFERENTIAL MATRIX FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PROXIMAL CONTACT IN CLASS 2 RESTORATIONS
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Islamabad, Pakistan, 04403
- Recruiting
- Pims ,school of dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Tooth with compound class 2 cavities Patient with good general health. Patient with minimum age of 18 years. Fully erupted occluding premolar and molar teeth.
Exclusion Criteria:
Tooth complex class 2 cavities. Tooth with severe periodontal disease. Diastema between posterior teeth. Third molars are excluded.
. Tooth mobility greater than 1 mm.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sectional matrix band
precontoured sectional matrix band
|
The sectional matrix is the best way to achieve a strong contact point in Class II restorations with composite resin in the posterior dental sector.
The pre-wedging is essential to get a separation between teeth which avoid the matrix deformation during its insertion
Circumferential matrix (thickness 0.038mm) ,the band encircle the tooth and secured by retainer on the buccal and lingual aspect
|
|
Active Comparator: Circumferential matrix band
Circumferential matrix band applied by tofflemire retainer
|
The sectional matrix is the best way to achieve a strong contact point in Class II restorations with composite resin in the posterior dental sector.
The pre-wedging is essential to get a separation between teeth which avoid the matrix deformation during its insertion
Circumferential matrix (thickness 0.038mm) ,the band encircle the tooth and secured by retainer on the buccal and lingual aspect
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tightness of proximal contact
Time Frame: immediately after the procedure
|
Proximal contact either optimum, tight, or open contact by using dental floss
|
immediately after the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SOD/ERB/2023/18
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.