Comparison of A-PRF vs Bone Wax in Hemostasis, Pain Relief and Healing Following Exodontia
Comparison of A-PRF vs Bone Wax in Hemostasis, Pain Relief and Healing Following Exodontia: A Single-blind Randomised Control Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the pain relief and healing effect of A-PRF and Bone-wax in patients having mandibular tooth-extractions. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
In the perspective of improvement in pain and healing;
- Does A-PRF performs better than control group?
- Does Bone-wax performs better than control group?
- Healing index and Pain scale score Comparison of A-PRF and Bone-wax; if one is better than the other? Participants will be asked to give resoponse to a post-operative symptom severiety (PoSSe) scale. An investigator will score the patient's extraction for hemostasis and on healing index [describe the main tasks participants will be asked to do, treatments they'll be given and use bullets if it is more than 2 items]. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare [insert groups] to see if [insert effects].
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Sindh
-
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 75510
- Recruiting
- Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre
-
Contact:
- Rehan Ahmad, BDS
- Phone Number: +92 343 8850508
- Email: rehan3489@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Jehan Alam, FCPS
- Phone Number: +92 300 2811979
- Email: drjanfcps@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Rehan Ahmad, BDS
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Jehan Alam, FCPS (OMFS)
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Sabeen Masood, BDS
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Rabia Arshad, PhD (Pharmacology)
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Nabeel Naeem Baig, PhD (Public Health)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients who need extraction of mandibular posterior teeth
- Overall, systemically healthy individuals (Established based on history, i.e., patients who do not take medicine for any systemic condition).
- INR within normal range.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a diagnosed systemic condition.
- Patients who are immunocompromised.
- Patients who are unwilling to participate or withdraw from the study.
- Patients who fail to report on the seventh and twenty-first post-extraction day.
- Patients with physical or mental impairments who need assistance in taking their medications.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: A-PRF
Advance Platelet-Rich Fibrin
|
0.5 to 1g of Advance Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) clot for each dental socket.
|
|
Active Comparator: Bone-wax
|
0.5 to 1g of Bone-wax for each dental socket
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Conventional Dental Extraction protocol
Control Group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Relief on VAS
Time Frame: 21 days
|
Patients receiving any of the intervention will be evaluated at just before, 3rd, 7th and 21st day of dental extraction on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
|
21 days
|
|
Extraction socket healing
Time Frame: 21 days
|
Patients receiving any of the intervention will be evaluated at 3rd, 7th and 21st day of dental extraction on Healing index by Landry et al.
|
21 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hemostasis
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
The post-operative bleeding will be evaluated 30 minutes after the placement of the last suture as:
|
30 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ruta DA, Bissias E, Ogston S, Ogden GR. Assessing health outcomes after extraction of third molars: the postoperative symptom severity (PoSSe) scale. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Oct;38(5):480-7. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0339.
- Landry RG, Turnbell RS, Howley T (1988) Effectiveness of benzydamine HCL in treatment of periodontal post-surgical patients. Res Clin Forums 10:105-118.
- Yelamali T, Saikrishna D. Role of platelet rich fibrin and platelet rich plasma in wound healing of extracted third molar sockets: a comparative study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Jun;14(2):410-6. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0638-4. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- F.2-81/2022-GENL/338/JPMC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.