Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Pediatric Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs)

July 31, 2026 updated by: Biao Zou

Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Children

Safety and efficacy of FMT in Pediatric Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The gut microbiota is critical to health and functions with a level of complexity comparable to that of an organ system. Dysbiosis, or alterations of this gut microbiota ecology, have been implicated in a number of disease states. Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), also known as brain-intestinal interaction abnormalities, are associated with dynamic disorders, high visceral sensitivity, changes in mucosal and immune functions, changes in intestinal flora, and abnormal central nervous system regulatory functions. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a process in which a presumed healthy and diverse microbiome is transplanted to a patient using a nasogastric tube, colonoscopy, or enema, or Fecal capsule to remodel the intestinal flora balance. At present, there are few clinical studies on the treatment of FGID in children with FMT. The investigators prospectively enrolled functional children who met the Rome IV standard, and divided them into conventional treatment group or FMT group with open choice. The efficacy of the two groups was collected and compared at different time points, and the flora of children in the FMT group before and after treatment was collected to monitor FMT-related adverse reactions

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
      • Wuhan, China, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The diagnosis and classification of patients with FGIDs were in accordance with the ROME IV criteria for children

Exclusion Criteria:

  • organic gastrointestinal disease (as established by medical history, blood routine, biochemistry, c-reaction protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fecal routine examinations.)
  • other chronic disease
  • growth failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: fecal microbiota transplantation
Fecal microbiota transplantation routes include the upper digestive tract, lower digestive tract, or oral fecal microbiota transplantation capsules
Biological: FMT
FMT is a technique in which intestinal microbiota are transferred from a healthy screened donor to a patient, with the goal being to introduce or restore a stable microbial community in the gut. FMT was given 1-3courses, 3-6 times per courses
Other Names:
  • fecal microbiota transplantation
Sham Comparator: Conventional drug intervention
Conventional drugs include: probiotics and omeprazole, and cyproheptadine and L-Glutamine and Sodium Gualenate Granules.
Drug: Conventional drugs
Conventional drugs include probiotics and omeprazole, and cyproheptadine and L-Glutamine and Sodium Gualenate Granules
Other Names:
  • cyproheptadine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The composite response
Time Frame: at weeks 4 and 8

Requiring a ≥50% reduction in GSRS score AND a ≥50% reduction in either the F-VAS or FPS-R score, with no addition of any non-permitted medications, was considered treatment success.

For the GSRS, a clinician-administered semi-structured interview evaluating five domains (reflux, abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, and dyspepsia; total score range: 15-105) was conducted. The items are scored between 1 and 7, where 1 corresponds to "no discomfort at all" and 7 to "very severe discomfort" from the symptom.

For Faces Visual Analog Scale, patients rated their pain on an age-adapted 100-mm linear scale with cartoon facial gradients ("happy→neutral→distressed") for real-time pain intensity quantification (range: 0-100).

For revised Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale, a six-level behaviorally anchored scale (0-10) combined with vital sign monitoring (heart rate/blood pressure correlations) was used as a visual pain assessment tool.
at weeks 4 and 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean number of bowel movements per week
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 8weeks
change in the mean number of bowel movements per week
4 weeks and 8weeks
Change in Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 8 weeks
PSQI assesses sleep quality in children. A higher score indicates poorer sleep quality. The PSQI will be assessed from baseline to 1 weeks and from baseline to 1 month. PSQI is scored from 0 to 21 points. The higher the score, the worse the sleep. PSQI≥8 was poor sleep quality, and 7 was the cut-off value
4 weeks and 8 weeks
Bristol stool scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Change in stool consistency assessed using the Bristol Stool Form Scale. The Bristol stool classification divides stool into seven categories. Types 1 and 2 indicate constipation; Types 3 and 4 are ideal for bowel movements, while types 5 to 7 indicate possible diarrhea.
4 weeks and 8 weeks
Irritable bowel syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 8 weeks
IBS-SSS is a visual assessment scale (VAS) rating from 0 to 100, with total scores ranging from 0 to 500. Mild, moderate and severe cases are indicated by scores of 75 to 175, 175 to 300 and > 300.
4 weeks and 8 weeks
gut microbial
Time Frame: 4 weeks and/or 8 weeks
Fecal 16S RNA or macrogene sequencing was performed. Fecal samples were obtained from donor and recipient. The fecal samples and isolated microbiota samples were frozen immediately and underwent DNA extraction using standard methods.
4 weeks and/or 8 weeks
Adverse events
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 8 weeks
All possible adverse events after FMT: fever, abdominal pain, infectious diseases and others
4 weeks and 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Biao Zou

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Zhihua Huang, Tongji Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 5, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 9, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 31, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 027-63639582

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings