HS2 US Liver Reader Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a retrospective investigation of Computer Topographies (CTs)/ Holographic visualization based on CTs retrieved from patients with metastases in the liver from colorectal cancer.
The study consists of:
- Preparations at Day 0. The reader is not involved in the preparation
- Using of HS2 and evaluation at Day 1-2
- Calculation at Day 3.
The study will enroll eligible subject's images.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10065
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Livers with colorectal cancer liver metastasis
- CTs from individuals 22 years or older
- CTs retrieved from US hospitals
- CTs from patients treated in the US
- At least 1 visible liver lesion to complete detection of L1
Exclusion Criteria:
No exclusion criteria
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Readers
5 trained GI surgeons within liver surgery (the readers) will identify pre-defined anatomical landmarks in liver CT images that have been processed by HS2
|
3D HV
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Identification of all pre-defined landmarks.
Time Frame: 3 days
|
All readers able to identify all pre-defined landmarks.
|
3 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison between CT and HV distance.
Time Frame: 3 days
|
Comparison between CT and HV distance in mm between a marker in a defined center of each portal landmark (difference less than 8.0 mm).
|
3 days
|
|
Comparison of image quality between CT and HV.
Time Frame: 3 days
|
Comparison of image quality between CT and HV on a 5-graded scale (1=HV significantly poorer quality than CT, 2=HV somewhat poorer quality than CT, 3=HV as good as CT, 4=HV somewhat better than CT, 5=HV significantly better than CT).
More than 50% should be scored as HV as good as CT or better.
All five readers scoring 3 or higher.
|
3 days
|
|
Evaluate ease of use.
Time Frame: 3 days
|
Evaluate ease of use on a 5-graded scale (1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=neither difficult nor easy, 4=easy, 5=very easy).
All five readers scoring 4 or 5.
|
3 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CIHS2-002
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.