Evaluation of TaiHao Breast Ultrasound Diagnosis Software RN-CES Descartes
Evaluation of TaiHao Breast Ultrasound Diagnosis Software (Plan for Partial Modification of Diagnostic Performance)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 10663
- TaiHao Medical Inc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female patients aged 20 to 69, including those with and without breast lesions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have a pacemaker or prosthetic valve.
- A post-surgery follow-up patient.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Define Standard of Truth (SOT) by 3 experts
Three experts A, B, and C independently define standard of truth (SOT) about 108 cases.
|
TaiHao Breast Cancer Diagnostic Software independently define standard of truth (SOT) about108 cases.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The average performance of the 4 machines, in terms of sensitivity for detecting suspicious breast cancer, is not inferior to Siemens performance.
Time Frame: 1 week
|
The average of 4 types of machines (Canon Aplio i800, GE Logiq E10, GE Invenia ABUS, Fuji ARIETTA 60) performance compared to Siemens performance which was submitted to PMDA last time.
|
1 week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The performance of each of the 4 machines, in terms of sensitivity for detecting suspicious breast cancer, is not inferior to Siemens' performance.
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Each machine (Canon Aplio i800, GE Logiq E10, GE Invenia ABUS, Fuji ARIETTA 60) performance compared to Siemens performance which was submitted to PMDA last time.
|
1 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TaiHao TVGH2020-07-006AC#1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.