Investigation of the Benefits of Electrical Non-invasive Stimulation on Cognitive Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease (STIMPARK)

July 6, 2026 updated by: Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer's disease.

It is mostly characterized by the presence of motor difficulties. However, it can also be accompanied by cognitive disorders which have an equally significant impact on the quality of life of patients and which are not relieved by any treatment.

Among the functions affected by Parkinson's disease, inhibition is an essential process for adapting our behaviors in daily life. Inhibition allows us to stop an action that is no longer required or appropriate to the situation in which we find ourselves in. For example, it comes into play when we have to stop at a "stop" sign while driving.

Recent studies suggest that it could be possible to improve the functioning of these processes by using non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Transcranial alternating current electrical stimulation has thus showed promising results in improving functions such as working memory. This technique is completely painless and non-invasive and consists in applying an electric current of very low intensity (barely perceptible) at the level of the scalp, using electrodes.

The investigators are conducting a study to test whether transcranial alternating current electrical stimulation could improve the functioning of the inhibition process which is altered in patients. For this, the investigators will measure this process using a task performed on a computer (the Stop Signal Reaction Time Task), as well as brain activity using a method called "electroencephalography", before and after stimulation. For this study, the investigators will include 50 patients and 40 healthy participants to investigate the effect of the stimulation on inhibition.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Rennes, France
        • CHU de Rennes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For all participants:

  • Affiliation to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme.
  • Age over 18 years old.
  • Age less than 75 years old
  • Correct or correctly corrected view (on simple declaration by the patient).
  • Subject having received information on the protocol and having provided informed and written consent to participate.

Criteria exclusive to patients:

- Idiopathic Parkinson's disease according to United Kingdom Parkinson's criteria Brain Bank disease (Hughes et al., 1992).

Exclusion Criteria:

For all participants:

  • Major cognitive impairment (Moca < 22) or severe neurocognitive disorder according to DSM-V (Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders -V);
  • Motor difficulties preventing the achievement of the task.
  • Drug or alcohol addiction.
  • Adult subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship), persons deprived of liberty.
  • Present or past moderate to severe psychiatric pathology (obsessive compulsive, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, etc.).
  • Potential for pregnancy or confirmed pregnancy. A pregnancy test will be performed on inclusion.for women of childbearing age.

Criteria exclusive to patients:

  • Present or past neurological pathology other than Parkinson's disease (accident stroke, head trauma, etc.).
  • Deep brain stimulation treatment.

Exclusive to healthy participants:

- Present or past neurological pathology.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Patients with Parkinson disease
Patients with idiopathic PD. Will receive real or sham transcranial alternating current stimulation at the second visit according to the randomization order. The other stimulation condition will be applied at the third visit.
Other: Neuropsychological assessment
interview with a neuropsychologist and carrying out tests measuring overall cognitive abilities, depression, apathy and anxiety (respectively using the MOCA, MADRS, LARS, STAI scales)
Other: Neurological assessment
Only for patients with Parkinson disease. Evaluation consisting in a disease severity assessment using the Hoehn and Yahr and Schwab and England scales, as a well as a measure of levodopa equivalent daily dose.
Other: Cognitive task
The task consists in pressing a left or right button as fast and as accurately as possible according to the direction of an arrow displayed at the center of a screen. On 25 % of the trials, a "stop" signal will occur right after the stimulus, indicating the participant to stop his impending button press. The delay between the presentation of the arrow stimulus and the stop signal will be adjusted to ensure a final 50% accuracy (decreased following an accurate response and increased after an error), which is necessary to comply with the assumptions for a robust calculation of the stop signal reaction time (SSRT).
Procedure: EEG
A high-resolution (256 channels) electroencephalographic recording will be done at rest and during the Stop task, before and after each real or sham stimulation.
Procedure: tACS (real or sham)
Real or sham tACS will be applied with the same equipment (StarStim, Neuroelectrics). The stimulation will consist in applying a current (max 2 mA) at frontal sites (F8 and Cz according to standard EEG position, and defined based on dosimetry analyses on averaged head models) for 12-15 minutes during the task. A 10 s ramp (fade-in/fade-out) will be used to avoid current perception of the stimulation and optimize blinding. Sham stimulation will be done using the same protocol, but with no stimulation in between onset and offset.
Experimental: Healthy volunteers
Healthy volunteers with no major cognitive impairment. Will receive real or sham transcranial alternating current stimulation at the second visit according to the randomization order. The other stimulation condition will be applied at the third visit.
Other: Neuropsychological assessment
interview with a neuropsychologist and carrying out tests measuring overall cognitive abilities, depression, apathy and anxiety (respectively using the MOCA, MADRS, LARS, STAI scales)
Other: Cognitive task
The task consists in pressing a left or right button as fast and as accurately as possible according to the direction of an arrow displayed at the center of a screen. On 25 % of the trials, a "stop" signal will occur right after the stimulus, indicating the participant to stop his impending button press. The delay between the presentation of the arrow stimulus and the stop signal will be adjusted to ensure a final 50% accuracy (decreased following an accurate response and increased after an error), which is necessary to comply with the assumptions for a robust calculation of the stop signal reaction time (SSRT).
Procedure: EEG
A high-resolution (256 channels) electroencephalographic recording will be done at rest and during the Stop task, before and after each real or sham stimulation.
Procedure: tACS (real or sham)
Real or sham tACS will be applied with the same equipment (StarStim, Neuroelectrics). The stimulation will consist in applying a current (max 2 mA) at frontal sites (F8 and Cz according to standard EEG position, and defined based on dosimetry analyses on averaged head models) for 12-15 minutes during the task. A 10 s ramp (fade-in/fade-out) will be used to avoid current perception of the stimulation and optimize blinding. Sham stimulation will be done using the same protocol, but with no stimulation in between onset and offset.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference in cognitive performance measured by the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) compared between real and sham stimulation conditions
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in the dynamic changes in functional networks during the task between real and sham stimulation.
Time Frame: 5 months
The difference in the dynamic changes in functional networks during the task between real and sham stimulation measured by the averaged lifespan (in ms) if the networks identified with the weighted phase lag index.
5 months
The difference in network parameters derived from graph theory between real and sham stimulation.
Time Frame: 5 months
The difference in network parameters derived from graph theory between real and sham stimulation. measured by the functions of the brain connectivity toolbox (matlab) : degree distribution, path length, betweenness centrality, clustering coefficient.
5 months
The existence of correlations between the changes in network measures between real and sham stimulation mentioned above and the behavioral differences measured between real and sham stimulation.
Time Frame: 5 months
Correlations will be calculated in R using the spearman rank correlations between (i) changes in network measures between real and sham stimulation : averaged network lifespan, degree distribution, path length, betweenness centrality, clustering coefficient, and (ii) behavioral differences in SSRT (ms).
5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paul Sauleau, MD, Rennes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 29, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • C21-76
  • 2022- A00767-36 (Registry Identifier: IDRCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings