Individualized Assessment of Motor Function and Balance in Intensive Therapy
Individualized Use of a Multi-dimensional Instrumented Assessment of Motor Function and Balance Following an Intensive Therapy Episode of Care
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Jamie B Hall, PT, DPT, PhD
- Phone Number: 5738847531
- Email: halljami@health.missouri.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Dana Chole, DPT
- Email: choled@health.missouri.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65201
- Children's Therapy Center--MU Healthcare
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ambulatory children 7-17 years old receiving care in an interdisciplinary, intensive therapy program
- GMFCS Levels I and II
- able to follow 2-3 step directions
- English speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
- orthopedic surgery in the past year or
- significant visual impairment
- significant hearing impairment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: before physical therapy begins
|
center of pressure as a measure of postural control obtained from a forceplate obtained while eyes closed standing on firm surface
|
before physical therapy begins
|
|
Eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: immediately following physical therapy
|
center of pressure as a measure of postural control obtained from a forceplate obtained while eyes closed standing on firm surface
|
immediately following physical therapy
|
|
Eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: 6 weeks following physical therapy
|
center of pressure as a measure of postural control obtained from a forceplate obtained while eyes closed standing on firm surface
|
6 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
Eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: 12 weeks following physical therapy
|
center of pressure as a measure of postural control obtained from a forceplate obtained while eyes closed standing on firm surface
|
12 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
Eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: before physical therapy
|
joint kinematics (movement strategies) obtained while eyes closed standing on firm surface
|
before physical therapy
|
|
Eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: immediately following physical therapy
|
joint kinematics (movement strategies) obtained while eyes closed standing on firm surface
|
immediately following physical therapy
|
|
Eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: 6 weeks following physical therapy
|
joint kinematics (movement strategies) obtained while eyes closed standing on firm surface
|
6 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
Eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: 12 weeks following physical therapy
|
joint kinematics (movement strategies) obtained while eyes closed standing on firm surface
|
12 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
Walking
Time Frame: before physical therapy
|
speed obtained from spatial sensor
|
before physical therapy
|
|
Walking
Time Frame: immediately following physical therapy
|
speed obtained from spatial sensor
|
immediately following physical therapy
|
|
Walking
Time Frame: 6 weeks following physical therapy
|
speed obtained from spatial sensor
|
6 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
Walking
Time Frame: 12 weeks following
|
speed obtained from spatial sensor
|
12 weeks following
|
|
Walking
Time Frame: before physical therapy
|
stride length obtained from spatial sensor
|
before physical therapy
|
|
Walking
Time Frame: immediately following physical therapy
|
stride length obtained from spatial sensor
|
immediately following physical therapy
|
|
Walking
Time Frame: 6 weeks following physical therapy
|
stride length obtained from spatial sensor
|
6 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
Walking
Time Frame: 12 weeks following physical therapy
|
stride length obtained from spatial sensor
|
12 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
5 Times sit to stand test
Time Frame: before physical therapy
|
time to complete obtained from spatial sensor
|
before physical therapy
|
|
5 Times sit to stand test
Time Frame: immediately following physical therapy
|
time to complete obtained from spatial sensor
|
immediately following physical therapy
|
|
5 Times sit to stand test
Time Frame: 6 weeks following physical therapy
|
time to complete obtained from spatial sensor
|
6 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
5 Times sit to stand test
Time Frame: 12 weeks following physical therapy
|
time to complete obtained from spatial sensor
|
12 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
5 Times sit to stand test
Time Frame: before physical therapy
|
knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor
|
before physical therapy
|
|
5 Times sit to stand test
Time Frame: immediately following physical therapy
|
knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor
|
immediately following physical therapy
|
|
5 Times sit to stand test
Time Frame: 6 weeks following physical therapy
|
knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor
|
6 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
5 Times sit to stand test
Time Frame: 12 weeks following physical therapy
|
knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor
|
12 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
Step down
Time Frame: before physical therapy
|
knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor
|
before physical therapy
|
|
Step down
Time Frame: immediately following physical therapy
|
knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor
|
immediately following physical therapy
|
|
Step down
Time Frame: 6 weeks following physical therapy
|
knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor
|
6 weeks following physical therapy
|
|
Step down
Time Frame: 12 weeks following physical therapy
|
knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor
|
12 weeks following physical therapy
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Measures of processes of care
Time Frame: immediately following the episode of care
|
Questionnaire designed to assess parents' perceptions of the care they and their children receive from children's rehabilitation treatment centres.
It is a means to assess family-centred behaviours of health care providers.
|
immediately following the episode of care
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tinderholt Myrhaug H, Ostensjo S, Larun L, Odgaard-Jensen J, Jahnsen R. Intensive training of motor function and functional skills among young children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Dec 5;14:292. doi: 10.1186/s12887-014-0292-5.
- Guess TM, Bliss R, Hall JB, Kiselica AM. Comparison of Azure Kinect overground gait spatiotemporal parameters to marker based optical motion capture. Gait Posture. 2022 Jul;96:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.021. Epub 2022 May 21.
- Thomas J, Hall JB, Bliss R, Guess TM. Comparison of Azure Kinect and optical retroreflective motion capture for kinematic and spatiotemporal evaluation of the sit-to-stand test. Gait Posture. 2022 May;94:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
- French MA, Roemmich RT, Daley K, Beier M, Penttinen S, Raghavan P, Searson P, Wegener S, Celnik P. Precision Rehabilitation: Optimizing Function, Adding Value to Health Care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun;103(6):1233-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.154. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
- Gannotti ME. Coupling Timing of Interventions With Dose to Optimize Plasticity and Participation in Pediatric Neurologic Populations. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;29 Suppl 3(Suppl 3 IV STEP 2016 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS ):S37-S47. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000383.
- Gannotti ME, Christy JB, Heathcock JC, Kolobe TH. A path model for evaluating dosing parameters for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2014 Mar;94(3):411-21. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130022. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
- Hall JB, Chole D, Pruitt TC, Linkeman K. Caregiver Perceptions of an Interdisciplinary Intensive Therapy Program: A Qualitative Study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2023 Apr 1;35(2):228-235. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000994. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2096274
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.