'Cancer Patients Better Life Experience' (CAPABLE)

July 3, 2023 updated by: The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Pilot Study of the eHealth Application 'Cancer Patients Better Life Experience'

The purpose of this study is to compare health-related quality of life, specifically fatigue, in melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy who use or do not use a patient-centered mobile coaching and monitoring system (CAPABLE). It is expected that by using the CAPABLE eHealth tool, patients' fatigue worsens less significantly (10 points) in the first 3 months follow-up than observed in usual care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospectively enrolling, explorative cohort study in melanoma patients, eligible for or on treatment with ICI therapy. The explorative cohort receives the CAPABLE smartphone application and a multi-sensorial smartwatch. Patients will be asked to use the system for minimum of three to maximum of six months after enrolment. Questionnaires on health-related quality of life (such as fatigue) and user experience will be administered to the patients on baseline/before start treatment (T0), three months (T1) and six months (T2). Results of this interventional study will be compared with a historical cohort consisting of melanoma patients (P20MEL; NL75996.031.20) with the same inclusion criteria as this study population, but receiving standard care (e.g. without the CAPABLE app).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
    • North Holland
      • Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands, 1066CX
        • Recruiting
        • Netherlands Cancer Institute
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 years of age
  • Sufficient understanding of the Dutch language
  • Participants or their caregiver can use a smartphone (upon patient's consent)
  • Histologically confirmed stage III or IV melanoma who receive treatment with immune checkpoint-inhibitors, according to the clinical guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Included in a clinical trial
  • >12 months on active treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CAPABLE cohort
Group that receives the CAPABLE application during treatment
Device: Cancer Patients Better Life Experience (CAPABLE)
The CAPABLE system serves three main goals for the patient: symptom monitoring, information needs fulfilment and interventions to improve mental- and physical wellbeing. These are available to the patient as a smartphone application that is connected to a smartwatch to monitor activity, blood pressure, sleep and heart rate. Patients are able to report symptoms experienced from the treatment and are eligible to do interventions such as mindfulness or yoga. Patients will receive the CAPABLE application and smartwatch for a minimum 3 to a maximum of 6 months after start treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fatigue between baseline and 3 and 6 months, as measured by fatigue symptom scale of The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6
Fatigue is measured on a score from 0-100, the lower the score the less fatigue a patient has
Baseline, month 3, month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in health-related quality of life and QALY's between baseline and 3 and 6 months, as measured by The EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D-5L).
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6
The EQ-5D is a standardised 5-level, 5-dimensional multi-attribute utility questionnaire that measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. It contains a visual analogue scale, with a score from 0 to 100, the higher the score, the better the outcome. Furthermore, it measures utility scores that can be linked to a country index and be further used in cost-effectiveness analysis.
Baseline, month 3, month 6
Change in health-related quality of life and physical symptoms between baseline and 3 and 6 months, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6

Funtional domains: scale from 0 to 100, the higher the score, the better the functioning.

Symptoms: on a scale from 0 to 100, the higher the score, the worse the symptom
Baseline, month 3, month 6
Change in melanoma specific quality of life between baseline and 3 and 6 months, as measured by the FACT-M
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6
Of the FACT-M, we use the Melanoma Subscale (scale 0 to 64) and the Melanoma Surgery Subscale (scale 0 to 32), items specific to quality of life in melanoma patients. High scores show a high quality of life. The higher the score the better the quality of life is.
Baseline, month 3, month 6
Change in patient reported immunotherapy-related toxicity between baseline and 3 and 6 months, as measured by a self-developed questionnaire using EORTC item bank items
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6
We identified, based on literature and expert opinion, 19 symptoms and created a symptom list based on items of the EORTC item Library. Scale from 0 to 100, the higher the score, the worse the symptom.
Baseline, month 3, month 6
Change in psychological distress between baseline and 6 months, as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6
The HADS is a 14-itemquestionnaire, assesses symptoms of mood disturbance, yielding separate scale scores for anxiety and depression, as well as a total score. The higher the score, the worse the depression and/or anxiety is.
Baseline, month 6
Change in information satisfaction/needs between baseline and 6 months, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-INFO25
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6
Measures different domains of satisfaction with delivered information. Scale of 0 to 100, the higher the score the higher the satisfaction/delivered information.
Baseline, month 6
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
The ratio of patients that are included in the study out of the patients eligible for study participation
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Patient compliance
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
The ratio of patients completing the questionnaire and using the CAPABLE app, out of the included patients
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Usability/user experience as measured by The System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: Baseline
The System Usability Scale (SUS) consists of a 10 item questionnaire with five response options for respondents. The participant's scores are converted to original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Scores should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking.
Baseline
Usability/user experience as measured by PAtient Trust Assessment Tool (PATAT)
Time Frame: Month 3
Measured on a Likert-scale from 1 to 5. A score higher than 3 is considered trust in telemedicine. Reported as the percentage that has a score higher than 3 and the percentage that scored equal or below 3.
Month 3
Usability/user experience as measured by the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
Time Frame: Month 6
The uMARS is a20-item measure that includes 4 objective quality subscales-engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality-and 1 subjective quality subscale. The higher the score the better the outcomes.
Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Pavia
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
University of Haifa
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Biomeris s.r.l.
IBM Research
Bitsens JSC
Poznań University of Technology
Instituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri
Deontics LTD
Associazione Italiana Malati di Cancro

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P22BLE
  • NL81970.000.22 (Other Identifier: CCMO)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings