Improving Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening (AMRIK)

March 31, 2025 updated by: Naik Vietti Violi

Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Performance and Cost-effectiveness of US and Abbreviated MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening

This is a monocentric, single blind, interventional, single arm study. It is designed to compare the rates of detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by ultrasound (US) used in clinical routine vs. abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AMRI). The hypothesis is that dynamic AMRI with extracellular contrast agent injection has a higher patient-level detection rate of HCC than screening US and non-contrast AMRI.

Interested and eligible patients will be enrolled and undergo HCC screening rounds including US +/- contrast-enhanced US (clinical routine) and screening MRI within the same week bi-annually.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
330

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • Recruiting
        • Lausanne University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Naik Vietti Violi, MD
        • Contact:
          • Clarisse Dromain, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients with chronic liver disease and indication for HCC screening according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver recommendations.
  • Informed Consent signed by the subject

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of HCC
  • History of other malignancy
  • Prior liver nodule categorized as LI-RAD 4, 5 or M
  • History of liver transplantation
  • Pregnancy
  • MRI or MRI contrast agent precaution
  • Any other condition making the patient unsuitable for the study
  • Patient's refusal of transmission of relevant medical conditions found on the medical examinations performed during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: HCC screening population according to European Association for the Study of the Liver recommendation
Device: MRI
To compare the diagnostic performance of US+/- Constrast-enhanced US and AMRI for HCC detection in an at-risk population
Other Names:
  • Constrast-enhanced US

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the diagnostic performance of US+/- CEUS and AMRI for HCC detection in an at-risk population
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

The patients will undergo all the normal follow-up according to clinical recommendations, consisting of a bi-annual clinical visit in the gastro-enterology department and an US. The US will be followed by CEUS in case of suspicious lesion. On the same week, the study participants will undertake MRI.

The data of the full MRI will be used to reconstruct two different AMRI sets for reading: non-contrast (NC-) and dynamic (Dyn-) AMRI.

The endpoint is the rate of HCC detection. Outcome measures will be compared in terms of ROC curve and AUC.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the patient-level accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of US +/- CEUS vs. AMRI for HCC.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Diagnostic performance of the different tests [(1)US alone, (2) US + CEUS, (3) NC-AMRI, (4) Dyn-AMRI] will be compared using all patient information (including complete MRI and pathology) as the reference standard.

Outcome measures will be compared in terms accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
To develop and test a DL model for HCC detection based on AMRI.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
AMRI DL based model will be analysed in terms of (1) diagnostic performance (ROC, AUC, sensitivitiy, specificity, accuracy) and (2) time savings compared to AMRI read by a radiologist.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing US to different alternative screening strategies for HCC in Switzerland.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Cost effectiveness analysis will be perfomed by building a model using all study data: patient characteristics, exam diagnostic performance and patient management costs.

Outcome will be analysed in terms of Lifetime costs, quality adjusted life expectancy
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing US to different alternative screening strategies for HCC in Switzerland.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Cost effectiveness analysis will be perfomed by building a model using all study data: patient characteristics, exam diagnostic performance and patient management costs.

Outcome will be analysed in terms of incremental costs effectiveness ratios.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Evaluate patient satisfaction and comfort with US +/- CEUS vs. AMRI with a questionnaire
Time Frame: Once, after the first screening round (US+/-CEUS and MRI), 6 months

In order to evaluation patient's opinion a survey regarding patient experience and opinion to the different test will be performed.

Outcome will be measured in term of level of confort using a 5-scale score: from low discomfort to high discomfort:

  1. No discomfort
  2. Low discomfort
  3. Neutral
  4. Comfort
  5. high comfort
Once, after the first screening round (US+/-CEUS and MRI), 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Naik Vietti Violi

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Naik Vietti Violi, MD, University of Lausanne Hospitals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 31, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CER-VD 2022-D0116

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings