Comparison of Two Different Flap Methods in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease
Bilaterally Parallel Elliptic Flap Versus Karydakis Flap in Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Underwent surgery due to pilonidal sinus disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a history of previous pilonidal sinus surgery,
- An acute pilonidal abscess,
- immunodeficiency,
- using immunosuppressive drugs,
- refuse to participate in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Bilateral Parallel Elliptic Flap
Patients operated with the bilateral parallel elliptic flap technique.
|
Advancement flap techniques in surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.
|
|
Active Comparator: Karydakis Flap
Patients operated with the karydakis flap technique.
|
Advancement flap techniques in surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time taken to return to work/school
Time Frame: The patients' return to work ranged from 11 to 49 days.
|
Time to return to work in daily life after surgery
|
The patients' return to work ranged from 11 to 49 days.
|
|
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The pain scores of the patients were determined on the first postoperative day.
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scored from 1 to 10, was administered to the patients to evaluate their postoperative pain levels.
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: The patients' length of hospital stay ranged from 1 to 4 days.
|
Time to discharge from hospital after surgery
|
The patients' length of hospital stay ranged from 1 to 4 days.
|
|
Recurrence of the disease
Time Frame: 43 months
|
Recurrence of the disease
|
43 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Johnson EK, Vogel JD, Cowan ML, Feingold DL, Steele SR; Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pilonidal Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):146-157. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001237. No abstract available.
- Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70641-7.
- Duman K, Girgin M, Harlak A. Prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease in Turkey. Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):434-437. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 14.
- Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet. 1973 Dec 22;2(7843):1414-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92803-1. No abstract available.
- Iesalnieks I, Ommer A, Herold A, Doll D. German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2569-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02060-1. Epub 2021 May 5.
- Yuksel BC, Berkem H, Ozel H, Hengirmen S. A new surgical method of pilonidal sinus treatment: a bilaterally paralel elliptic fascio-cutaneous advancement flap technique. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012;113(12):728-31. doi: 10.4149/bll_2012_165.
- Keshvari A, Keramati MR, Fazeli MS, Kazemeini A, Nouritaromlou MK. Risk factors for complications and recurrence after the Karydakis flap. J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
- Alvandipour M, Zamani MS, Ghorbani M, Charati JY, Karami MY. Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Blinded Parallel Randomized Study. Ann Coloproctol. 2019 May 22;35(6):313-318. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.09.27. Online ahead of print.
- Erkent M, Sahiner IT, Bala M, Kendirci M, Yildirim MB, Topcu R, Bostanoglu S, Dolapci M. Comparison of Primary Midline Closure, Limberg Flap, and Karydakis Flap Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2018 Dec 11;24:8959-8963. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913248.
- Sewefy AM, Hassanen A, Atyia AM, Saleh SK. Karydakis Flap With Compressing Tie-over Interrupted Sutures Without Drain versus Standard Karydakis for Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 May;60(5):514-520. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000784.
- Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3.
- Segre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B; Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery. The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Oct;19(10):607-13. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1369-3. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
- Keshvari A, Keramati MR, Fazeli MS, Kazemeini A, Meysamie A, Nouritaromlou MK. Karydakis flap versus excision-only technique in pilonidal disease. J Surg Res. 2015 Sep;198(1):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.039. Epub 2015 May 28.
- Tokac M, Dumlu EG, Aydin MS, Yalcin A, Kilic M. Comparison of modified Limberg flap and Karydakis flap operations in pilonidal sinus surgery: prospective randomized study. Int Surg. 2015 May;100(5):870-7. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00213.1.
- Arslan K, Said Kokcam S, Koksal H, Turan E, Atay A, Dogru O. Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study. Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Jan;18(1):29-37. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-0982-2. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
- Bali I, Aziret M, Sozen S, Emir S, Erdem H, Cetinkunar S, Irkorucu O. Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 May;70(5):350-5. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08. Epub 2015 May 1.
- Ates M, Dirican A, Sarac M, Aslan A, Colak C. Short and long-term results of the Karydakis flap versus the Limberg flap for treating pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.021. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
- Caliskan M, Kosmaz K, Subasi IE, Acar A, Evren I, Bas G, Atayoglu AT. Comparison of Common Surgical Procedures in Non-complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease, a 7-Year Follow-Up Trial. World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1091-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05331-1.
- Bessa SS. Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.
- Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;82(6):1169-85. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00062-2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- E-16-975
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.