THA With and Without Computer Navigation
The Use of Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Computer Navigation on Hip Arthroplasty Component Position
The goal of this observational study is to compare postoperative results between patients who had total hip arthroplasty (THA) with and without the use of a computer navigation program. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Can using computer navigation produce better THA implant placement?
- Can using computer navigation make surgery more efficient?
Participant data collected include their postoperative x-rays and total operative time.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32216
- Southeast Orthopedic Specialists
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who underwent Direct Anterior (DA) THA with the principal investigator between August 2018 and February 2020 and received ACTIS stem and PINNACLE cup with or without computer navigation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who underwent subsequent revision THA, conversion arthroplasty, hybrid procedures, experienced native or postoperative dislocations, and missing or inadequate radiographs at time of data collection.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Traditional Overlay
Subjects who underwent THA without use of computer navigation
|
|
|
Computer Navigation
Subjects who underwent THA with use of computer navigation
|
Computer technology used during surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cup inclination
Time Frame: 12 weeks post op
|
Acetabular cup orientation
|
12 weeks post op
|
|
Cup anteversion
Time Frame: 12 weeks post op
|
Acetabular cup anteversion
|
12 weeks post op
|
|
Leg length discrepancy
Time Frame: 12 weeks post op
|
Leg length discrepancy
|
12 weeks post op
|
|
Operative time
Time Frame: Immediate post op
|
Operative time in minutes
|
Immediate post op
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John Redmond, MD, Southeast Orthopedic Specialists
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DPS-JMP-2019-078
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.