Effects on Emphathy in Physiotherapy Students After Simulation as an Active Method for Learning the Clinical Enterview
Effects on Emphathy in Physiotherapy Students After Simulation With Kirkpatric Evaluation as an Active Method for Learning the Clinical Enterview
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Thirty-one first-year physiotherapy students will carry out the role-playing methodology to learn how to take a clinical history in physiotherapy.
Before and after the realization, they will be measured by means of a validated questionnaire in Spanish, the language in which they study, the variable of empathy.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Eva María Martínez Jiménez, PhD
- Phone Number: +34616255378
- Email: evamam03@ucm.es
Study Locations
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28040
- Eva María Martínez-Jiménez
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women who are studying the first year of Physiotherapy at the Complutense University of Madrid and wish to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Students who do not wish to participate in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Role-playing for learning the clinical interview
|
role-playing for learning the clinical interview
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Jefferson Scale or Medical Empathy Scale before role playing
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
To determine the empathy levels of nursing students, the validated Jefferson Empathy Scale for health professions students will be used.
This scale consists of 20 items, each of which is assessed using a seven-point Likert-type response scale (from 1 = 'strongly disagree' to 7 = 'strongly agree').
These items are divided into three subscales: 'perspective taking' (11 items), which refers to the cognitive aspects of empathy; 'compassionate care' (6 items), which is characterised by a combination of cognitive and affective aspects of empathy; and 'putting oneself in the patient's shoes' (three items), considered the inverse of emotional distancing .
Ten of these items are positively worded, while the other 10 are negatively worded and should be reversed.
The total scores range from 20 to 140 points.
Higher scores reflect higher levels of empathy.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
|
Empathy Quotent before role playing.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
It consists of 60 items, 40 measuring empathy and 20 control measures.
Scores range from 0 to 80.
It measures cognitive and affective empathy in adults.
Equalizer allows classification into four categories, which facilitates comparison between groups.
The cut-off for each level is: from 0 to 32 scores: low empathy (average scores in Asperger Syndrome is 20), from 33 to 52 scores: average empathy (average in men 42, average in women 47), from 53 to 63 scores: above average, from 64 to 80 scores: high empathy
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
|
Jefferson Scale or Medical Empathy Scale after role playing
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
To determine the empathy levels of nursing students, the validated Jefferson Empathy Scale for health professions students will be used.
This scale consists of 20 items, each of which is assessed using a seven-point Likert-type response scale (from 1 = 'strongly disagree' to 7 = 'strongly agree').
These items are divided into three subscales: 'perspective taking' (11 items), which refers to the cognitive aspects of empathy; 'compassionate care' (6 items), which is characterised by a combination of cognitive and affective aspects of empathy; and 'putting oneself in the patient's shoes' (three items), considered the inverse of emotional distancing .
Ten of these items are positively worded, while the other 10 are negatively worded and should be reversed.
The total scores range from 20 to 140 points.
Higher scores reflect higher levels of empathy.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
|
Empathy Quotent after role playing
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
This questionnaire has been widely used to measure empathy in health science students.13
It consists of 60 items, 40 measuring empathy and 20 control measures.
Scores range from 0 to 80.
It measures cognitive and affective empathy in adults.
Equalizer allows classification into four categories, which facilitates comparison between groups.
The cut-off for each level is: from 0 to 32 scores: low empathy (average scores in Asperger Syndrome is 20), from 33 to 52 scores: average empathy (average in men 42, average in women 47), from 53 to 63 scores: above average, from 64 to 80 scores: high empathy.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23/29302
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.