Effects of CBD Oil on Memory Reconsolidation and Trauma-Related Symptoms

January 5, 2024 updated by: Michael J. Telch, University of Texas at Austin

Effects of Cannabidiol on Memory Reconsolidation and Trauma-Related Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) broad-spectrum oil on memory reconsolidation (memory storage) and trauma-related symptoms in trauma-exposed individuals after exposure to a trauma memory reactivation paradigm.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

It is estimated that over 70% of individuals worldwide have experienced a trauma during their lifetime. Many people spontaneously recover without formal intervention or treatment after exposure to a traumatic event; however, some individuals may develop intrusive trauma-related memories, avoidance, negative changes in cognition or mood, or changes in arousal and reactivity, resulting in clinical or subclinical symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Recently, the potential therapeutic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) have been investigated as a treatment for physical and mental health issues. Preclinical trials with rodents suggest that CBD may disrupt the reconsolidation of conditioned fear memories when administered within the six-hour memory reconsolidation window. These preclinical findings suggest that CBD may be clinically useful for preventing or treating PTSD. Although promising, little translational research has investigated the disruptive effects of CBD on memory reconsolidation in a trauma-exposed human population.

The overarching objective of this study is to investigate the effects of CBD broad-spectrum oil on memory reconsolidation and trauma-related symptoms in trauma-exposed individuals after exposure to a trauma memory reactivation procedure. To accomplish this, participants will be randomized to one of three treatment conditions: (a) CBD oil administered within the reconsolidation window (CBD-WR), (b) placebo oil administered within the reconsolidation window (PBO-WR), or (c) CBD oil administered well outside of the accepted memory reconsolidation window (CBD-OR). Participants will undergo a trauma memory reactivation paradigm, rate their emotional distress level, and complete other trauma-related measures.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to investigate the effects of CBD broad-spectrum oil on memory reconsolidation and trauma-related symptoms among trauma-exposed individuals following exposure to a trauma memory reactivation paradigm. Additionally, this proof-of-concept pilot trial aims to contribute to the development of a novel, brief, packageable, and cost-effective secondary prevention or treatment for individuals with trauma-related fear memories and symptoms of trauma.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
        • The Laboratory for the Study of Anxiety Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults age 18 to 65;
  • Fluent in written and spoken English;
  • Has access to the internet;
  • Access to a camera with video recording capability;
  • History of trauma exposure to either a motor vehicle collision (MVC), sexual assault, physical assault, or combat;
  • Willingness to refrain from all non-study cannabis use during the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient emotional reactivity to trauma video clips
  • Presence of significant suicidality or a history of a suicide attempt within the past 6 months;
  • History or current alcohol or substance use disorder within the past month;
  • History of psychosis within the past 6 months;
  • Changes in psychotropic medication (≤ 8 weeks);
  • Currently receiving trauma-focused psychotherapy;
  • Any medical problem that would preclude participation in the study (e.g., liver or renal abnormalities or disease);
  • Any current medication that would preclude participation in the study (e.g., use of prescribed blood, such as warfarin; use of anti-seizure medications, such as valproate, lamotrigine, or clobazam; use of thyroid medications, such as levothyroxine; use of heart rhythm medications, such as amiodarone);
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant within the next 6 weeks;
  • Regular cannabis use;
  • History of adverse reaction to CBD oil or other CBD products;
  • Allergy to coconut or coconut oil

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CBD-WR

300 mg CBD broad-spectrum oil will be administered within the reconsolidation window.

Preclinical studies demonstrate that the disruptive effects of CBD oil on memory reconsolidation depend on the timing of pharmacological administration (within 6 hours of memory reactivation).

Thus, participants will be asked to take a single 300mg oral dose of CBD broad-spectrum oil immediately after the trauma memory reactivation procedure.
Behavioral: Trauma Memory Reactivation
Participants will be guided through the trauma memory reactivation paradigm by the study staff. The trauma memory reactivation paradigm entails two distinct procedures: (1) participants will watch a video clip related to their trauma; then (2) describe a verbal narrative of their traumatic event for approximately 5 minutes to a research team member.
Dietary supplement: Cannabidiol (CBD) Broad-Spectrum Oil
300mg CBD broad-spectrum oil.
Placebo Comparator: PBO-WR

Placebo oil will be administered within the reconsolidation window.

Participants will be asked to take a single dose of an MCT coconut oil placebo solution immediately after the trauma memory reactivation procedure.
Behavioral: Trauma Memory Reactivation
Participants will be guided through the trauma memory reactivation paradigm by the study staff. The trauma memory reactivation paradigm entails two distinct procedures: (1) participants will watch a video clip related to their trauma; then (2) describe a verbal narrative of their traumatic event for approximately 5 minutes to a research team member.
Dietary supplement: Placebo Oil
3ml oral dose of medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) coconut oil.
Active Comparator: CBD-OR

300mg CBD broad-spectrum oil will be administered outside of the reconsolidation window.

Participants will be asked to take a single 300mg oral dose of CBD broad-spectrum oil approximately 24 hrs after the trauma memory reactivation procedure.

Thus, CBD will be administered well beyond the critical period for memory reconsolidation. The inclusion of this third arm provides a more robust test of the specific reconsolidation theory-based study hypotheses and aids in controlling for any nonspecific possible anxiolytic effects of CBD.
Behavioral: Trauma Memory Reactivation
Participants will be guided through the trauma memory reactivation paradigm by the study staff. The trauma memory reactivation paradigm entails two distinct procedures: (1) participants will watch a video clip related to their trauma; then (2) describe a verbal narrative of their traumatic event for approximately 5 minutes to a research team member.
Dietary supplement: Cannabidiol (CBD) Broad-Spectrum Oil
300mg CBD broad-spectrum oil.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Momentary Assessment of Distress Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
The Momentary Assessment of Distress Scale (MADS) is a customizable sliding scale used to measure continuous real-time changes in levels of subjective emotional stress on scale from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). The MADS is used to index changes in emotional reactivity during exposure to a trauma memory reactivation cue.
Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that assesses symptoms consistent with the DSM-5 diagnosis of PTSD. Respondents rate the frequency of each symptom over the last month utilizing a 5-point scale (0 indicating "not at all"; 4 indicating "extremely").
Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
Posttraumatic Cognition Inventory
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
The Brief Version of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI-9) is a 9-item questionnaire that assesses negative posttraumatic cognition. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale with 1 indicating "Totally disagree" and 7 indicating "Totally agree." The instrument consists of three subscales (self-blame, negative cognitions of the self, and negative cognitions of the world) to yield the total and subscale scores, with higher scores indicating more negative posttraumatic cognitions.
Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
Posttraumatic Safety Behaviors Inventory
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
The Posttraumatic Safety Behavior Inventory (PSBI) is a 13-item self-report questionnaire that assesses safety behaviors related to PTSD. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with 0 indicating "Never" and 4 indicating "Always." The first 10 items of the inventory yield a summed total score. The last three items of the inventory are open-ended to record safety behavior specific to the respondent and can be used in clinical applications. Higher scores suggest more engagement with PTSD safety behaviors.
Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
Posttraumatic Growth Inventory
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PGTI) is a 21-item self-report scale that measures positive outcomes associated with traumatic events. Items are rated on a 6-point scale with 0 indicating "I did not experience this as a result of my crisis" and 5 indicating "I experienced this change to a very great degree as a result of my crisis." The inventory is comprised of five factors (appreciation of life relating to others, spiritual change, new possibilities, and personal strength).
Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
Trauma Coping Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
The Trauma Coping Self-Efficacy (CSE-T) Scale - 9-item is a brief self-report scale that assesses perceptions of coping self-efficacy following a traumatic experience. Respondents rate their perceived capacity to handle demands related to their trauma on a 7-point scale (1 indicating "Not at all capable"; 7 indicating "Totally capable").
Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up
The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale - 10 item (CD-RISC-10) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire that assesses resilience (e.g., the ability to cope with adverse experiences). Respondents rate items utilizing a 5-point scale (0 indicating "not true at all"; 4 indicating "true nearly all the time"). The summation of all items yields a total score, ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores suggesting greater resilience.
Change from Baseline to Two-week Follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Texas at Austin

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael J Telch, Ph.D., University of Texas at Austin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00004278

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on Trauma Memory Reactivation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings