Acute Responses of Postural Alignment, Kinematic Synergy, and Intermuscular Coherence to Postural Muscle Facilitation (Retrospective) (PPMvsRCM)
Postural alignment is often intervened upon in health, fitness, and physical medicine settings. Despite a long tradition in this area, current notions of optimal or normal posture are superficial and often logically inconsistent. A recent attempt to reconcile diverging opinions about good posture proposes that alignment be considered in relation to individual joints' natural tendencies to collapse under gravity. This theory allows different maladaptive postures to be described in terms of functional deficits and compensatory adaptations at the muscular level. Working within this type of theory, postural interventions may be able to account for comparative advantages in maintaining alignment between different muscle systems. This would represent a step forward from current practices, which usually attempt to force arbitrary alignment patterns indiscriminately.
The current study presents motion capture and electromyography (EMG) data evaluating the effects of two interventions on individual participants' bipedal standing alignment patterns with respect to the gravitational collapsing tendencies referenced above. Additional outcomes included functional grouping of muscle activation signals (via intermuscular coherence) and kinetic chain continuity. The interventions include 1) an experimental intervention purported to engage muscles that naturally resist the collapsing effects of gravity, and 2) a control intervention designed to inhibit other muscle groups that are sometimes involved in maintaining bipedal alignment in a compensatory role. Study outcomes are measured before and after both interventions to quantify the acute effects of each. All participants complete both interventions in random order, crossing over after a one-week washout period. This research will provide insight into the acute effects of studied interventions, specifically those relating to maintenance of bipedal alignment with respect to gravitational collapsing tendencies.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Virginia
-
Roanoke, Virginia, United States, 24013
- Radford University Carilion
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy adult
- 18 - 40 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recent (< 6 months) history of lower extremity injury
- Recent (< 6 months) history of other musculoskeletal or neurological disorder affecting balance
- Contraindications to participation in physical activity
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Exercise Then Foam Roll
This arm (sequence) will first complete the exercise intervention promoting muscular engagement resisting gravitational collapsing tendencies, then the control intervention involving self-myofascial release of muscle groups not thought to resist gravitational collapse.
|
Participants in AB will perform the experimental (exercise) intervention first and the control (foam rolling) intervention second.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Foam Roll Then Exercise
This arm (sequence) will first complete the control intervention involving self-myofascial release of muscle groups not thought to resist gravitational collapse, then the exercise intervention promoting muscular engagement resisting gravitational collapsing tendencies.
|
Participants in BA will perform the control (foam rolling) intervention first and the experimental (exercise) intervention second.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Euclidean distance from the vector describing subject-specific, simulated gravitational collapse
Time Frame: Immediately before Intervention (Day 1)
|
This outcome is a cumulative descriptor of segment angle distance from the pattern in which an individual's posture would collapse.
The reference point for each individual is calculated using both pre and post-intervention data for a given day.
|
Immediately before Intervention (Day 1)
|
|
Euclidean distance from the vector describing subject-specific, simulated gravitational collapse
Time Frame: Immediately after Intervention (Day 1)
|
This outcome is a cumulative descriptor of segment angle distance from the pattern in which an individual's posture would collapse.
The reference point for each individual is calculated using both pre and post-intervention data for a given day.
|
Immediately after Intervention (Day 1)
|
|
Euclidean distance from the vector describing subject-specific, simulated gravitational collapse
Time Frame: Immediately before Intervention (Day 7)
|
This outcome is a cumulative descriptor of segment angle distance from the pattern in which an individual's posture would collapse.
The reference point for each individual is calculated using both pre and post-intervention data for a given day.
|
Immediately before Intervention (Day 7)
|
|
Euclidean distance from the vector describing subject-specific, simulated gravitational collapse
Time Frame: Immediately after Intervention (Day 7)
|
This outcome is a cumulative descriptor of segment angle distance from the pattern in which an individual's posture would collapse.
The reference point for each individual is calculated using both pre and post-intervention data for a given day.
|
Immediately after Intervention (Day 7)
|
|
Pooled intermuscular coherence
Time Frame: Immediately before Intervention (Day 1)
|
Weighted average of frequency-domain correlations between muscle pairs belonging to anterior, posterior, and trunk muscle groups.
|
Immediately before Intervention (Day 1)
|
|
Pooled intermuscular coherence
Time Frame: Immediately after Intervention (Day 1)
|
Weighted average of frequency-domain correlations between muscle pairs belonging to anterior, posterior, and trunk muscle groups.
|
Immediately after Intervention (Day 1)
|
|
Pooled intermuscular coherence
Time Frame: Immediately before Intervention (Day 7)
|
Weighted average of frequency-domain correlations between muscle pairs belonging to anterior, posterior, and trunk muscle groups.
|
Immediately before Intervention (Day 7)
|
|
Pooled intermuscular coherence
Time Frame: Immediately after Intervention (Day 7)
|
Weighted average of frequency-domain correlations between muscle pairs belonging to anterior, posterior, and trunk muscle groups.
|
Immediately after Intervention (Day 7)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Top-down kinetic chain continuity
Time Frame: Immediately before Intervention (Day 1)
|
The purpose of this outcome is to quantify the communication of motion from the upper body to the lower body.
In a test involving placing hands-on-head and pulling the elbows back as far as possible, the response in the lower body is quantified by posterior rotation of the tibial segment.
|
Immediately before Intervention (Day 1)
|
|
Top-down kinetic chain continuity
Time Frame: Immediately after Intervention (Day 1)
|
The purpose of this outcome is to quantify the communication of motion from the upper body to the lower body.
In a test involving placing hands-on-head and pulling the elbows back as far as possible, the response in the lower body is quantified by posterior rotation of the tibial segment.
|
Immediately after Intervention (Day 1)
|
|
Top-down kinetic chain continuity
Time Frame: Immediately before Intervention (Day 7)
|
The purpose of this outcome is to quantify the communication of motion from the upper body to the lower body.
In a test involving placing hands-on-head and pulling the elbows back as far as possible, the response in the lower body is quantified by posterior rotation of the tibial segment.
|
Immediately before Intervention (Day 7)
|
|
Top-down kinetic chain continuity
Time Frame: Immediately after Intervention (Day 7)
|
The purpose of this outcome is to quantify the communication of motion from the upper body to the lower body.
In a test involving placing hands-on-head and pulling the elbows back as far as possible, the response in the lower body is quantified by posterior rotation of the tibial segment.
|
Immediately after Intervention (Day 7)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stephen Glass, PhD, Radford University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-288-RUC (Retrospective)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Equilibrium
-
NCT00497510CompletedMusculoskeletal Equilibrium
-
NCT00549406CompletedAccidental Falls | Musculoskeletal Equilibrium
-
NCT00497965CompletedMusculoskeletal Equilibrium
-
NCT00223353CompletedJoint Disease | Musculoskeletal Equilibrium
-
NCT05608850RecruitingKinematics | Musculoskeletal Equilibrium | Posture | Electromyography
-
NCT00497718CompletedBack Pain | Musculoskeletal Equilibrium
-
NCT04773496CompletedAging | Equilibrium; Disorder, Labyrinth
-
NCT03318458CompletedFall Due to Loss of Equilibrium
-
NCT01540916UnknownAcute Respiratory Variations of Acid-base Equilibrium
-
NCT00377689CompletedCerebrovascular Accident | Musculoskeletal Equilibrium
Clinical Trials on Exercise Then Foam Roll
-
NCT02924259CompletedMyofascial Pain Syndromes
-
NCT05608850RecruitingKinematics | Musculoskeletal Equilibrium | Posture | Electromyography
-
NCT03516149CompletedProprioceptive Disorders
-
NCT03312062CompletedProprioceptive Disorders
-
NCT04542668Completed
-
NCT04324827Completed
-
NCT04201977CompletedInflammatory Response | Muscle, Skeletal | Massage | Cryotherapy Effect | Functional Disturbance
-
NCT07278193Active, not recruitingPiriformis Syndrome