Two Different Graft Harvesting Techniques Applied in Localized Gingival Recessions
Clinical Comparison of Two Different Graft Harvesting Techniques Applied in Localized Gingival Recessions
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ezgi Gürbüz, DDS PhD
- Phone Number: +905557411860
- Email: ezgi.dogan@ksbu.edu.tr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kutahya, Turkey, 43020
- Kutahya Health Sciences University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 1 and 2 patients,healthy patients
- Nonsmokers
- Periodontally healthy patients
- Localized gingival recessions (Miller I, II, and Cairo I recessions with a depth of recession of at least 2 mm) in anterior and premolar teeth
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medically compromised patients, especially uncontrolled diabetes
- Pregnancy, lactation, or suspicion of pregnancy,
- Poor oral hygiene
- Recessions associated with caries or restoration
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: De-epithelialized gingival unit graft
In this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, the coin toss method will determine test and control groups.
In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area.
To obtain the connective tissue graft, the gingival unit graft will be de-epithelialized in the test group.
|
In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area.
|
|
Experimental: De-epithelialized free gingival graft
In this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, the coin toss method will determine test and control groups.
In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area.
To obtain the connective tissue graft, the traditional free gingival graft will be de-epithelialized in the control group.
|
In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Root coverage percentage
Time Frame: Postoperative 6th month
|
The comparison of the postoperative recession depth to the initial recession depth
|
Postoperative 6th month
|
|
Gingival thickness
Time Frame: Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
Gingival thickness in the mid-buccal of the recession defect measured with an endodontic spreader and digital recordings
|
Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recession width
Time Frame: Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
Recession width measured at the cemento-enamel junction
|
Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
|
Probing depth
Time Frame: Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
Probing depth measured at the mid-buccal of the recession defect
|
Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
|
Clinical attachment loss
Time Frame: Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
Clinical attachment loss measured at the mid-buccal of the recession defect
|
Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
|
Keratinized gingiva width
Time Frame: Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
Mid-buccal gingival width measured with a periodontal probe
|
Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
|
Vestibular depth
Time Frame: Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
The distance from the gingival margin to the greatest concavity of the mucosal fold
|
Preoperative and postoperative 6th month
|
|
Bleeding related to the procedure
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st week
|
Bleeding evaluated by a dichotomous index
|
Postoperative 1st week
|
|
Pain perception
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st week
|
Visual analog scale where higher scores mean a worse outcome and has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 10
|
Postoperative 1st week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Buti J, Baccini M, Graziani F, Tonelli P, Pagavino G, Tonetti MS. Root coverage procedures improve patient aesthetics. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Nov;43(11):965-975. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12603. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
- Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Feb;134(2):220-5. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0137.
- Kassab MM, Badawi H, Dentino AR. Treatment of gingival recession. Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Jan;54(1):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.08.009.
- Allen AL. Use of the gingival unit transfer in soft tissue grafting: report of three cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 Apr;24(2):165-75.
- Kuru B, Yildirim S. Treatment of localized gingival recessions using gingival unit grafts: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2013 Jan;84(1):41-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110685. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
- Mythri S, Arunkumar SM, Hegde S, Rajesh SK, Munaz M, Ashwin D. Etiology and occurrence of gingival recession - An epidemiological study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 Nov-Dec;19(6):671-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.156881.
- Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Stefanini M, Rasperini G, Valles C, Nart J, Wang HL. The influence of tooth location on the outcomes of multiple adjacent gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap: A multicenter re-analysis study. J Periodontol. 2019 Nov;90(11):1244-1251. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0732. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
- Sriwil M, Fakher MAA, Hasan K, Kasem T, Shwaiki T, Wassouf G. Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Gingival Unit Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recession: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):e103-e110. doi: 10.11607/prd.4180.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0043
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.