Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With and Without Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis
Comparison of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With and Without Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis for Proximal ACL Tears: A Prospective Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34040
- SBU Prof. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients who underwent surgery within the first 3 weeks after injury
- between the ages of 21-40 years,
- attended regular follow-up visits,
- Sherman type 1 proximal ACL tear with relatively preserved synovial sheath
- Sufficient tissue length for re-stretching.
Exclusion Criteria:
- torn ACL in the mid and distal region,
- torn synovial sheath,
- inability to undergo intrasubstance suturing,
- poor tissue quality with retraction,
- multiple ligament injuries and accompanying intra-knee pathologies (meniscal damage, chondral damage),
- previous knee surgery,
- rheumatologic diseases
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair
Investigators performed arthroscopic primary repair in 18 patients with proximal ACL tears.
|
Only arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair was performed in patients with proximal anterior cruciate ligament tear.
In addition to primary anterior cruciate ligament repair, lateral extraarticular tenodesis was performed using the iliotibial band.
|
|
Active Comparator: Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair and lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET)
Investigators performed arthroscopic primary repair and lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) with iliotibial band in 20 patients with proximal ACL tears.
|
Only arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair was performed in patients with proximal anterior cruciate ligament tear.
In addition to primary anterior cruciate ligament repair, lateral extraarticular tenodesis was performed using the iliotibial band.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of functional outcomes between two groups of patients who underwent ACL repair surgery with or without lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC).
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The outcomes were evaluated using various measures, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC).
The IKDC is a patient-completed tool, which contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items).
Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms)
|
24 months
|
|
Comparison of functional outcomes between two groups of patients who underwent ACL repair surgery with or without lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) with Tegner-Lysholm scoring system.
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The outcomes were evaluated using various measures, including theTegner-Lysholm scoring system.
The Tegner Lysholm scale consists of eight items with each question response being assigned an arbitrary score on an increasing scale.
The total score is the sum of each response to the eight questions and may range from 0-100 where higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disability.
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yasin Guler, Md, Metin Sabanci Baltalimani Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ateschrang A, Schreiner AJ, Ahmad SS, Schroter S, Hirschmann MT, Korner D, Kohl S, Stockle U, Ahrend MD. Improved results of ACL primary repair in one-part tears with intact synovial coverage. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5199-5. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
- Abusleme S, Stromback L, Caracciolo G, Zamorano H, Cheyre J, Vergara F, Yanez R. Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Technique With an Iliotibial Band Strand Without Implants. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jan 20;10(1):e85-e89. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.09.029. eCollection 2021 Jan.
- Achtnich A, Herbst E, Forkel P, Metzlaff S, Sprenker F, Imhoff AB, Petersen W. Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: Outcomes After Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Repair Versus Anatomic Single-Bundle Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2016 Dec;32(12):2562-2569. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.031. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
- Anderson MJ, Browning WM 3rd, Urband CE, Kluczynski MA, Bisson LJ. A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Mar 15;4(3):2325967116634074. doi: 10.1177/2325967116634074. eCollection 2016 Mar.
- Csintalan RP, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT. Incidence rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Perm J. 2008 Summer;12(3):17-21. doi: 10.7812/TPP/07-140.
- Di Benedetto P, Di Benedetto E, Fiocchi A, Beltrame A, Causero A. Causes of Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Revision Surgical Strategies. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016 Dec 1;28(4):319-324. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.16.007.
- DiFelice GS, van der List JP. Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Are Maintained at Mid-term Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1085-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.028. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
- DiFelice GS, Villegas C, Taylor S. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Preservation: Early Results of a Novel Arthroscopic Technique for Suture Anchor Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov;31(11):2162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.010.
- Friden T, Roberts D, Ageberg E, Walden M, Zatterstrom R. Review of knee proprioception and the relation to extremity function after an anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Oct;31(10):567-76. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.10.567.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Anterior Cruciate Tear Repair
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
NCT06233305RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
NCT07089459CompletedLow Level Laser Therapy Versus Short Wave Diathermy in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Tear
-
NCT06664047RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
NCT06524349Active, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
NCT04039971Active, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
NCT02292004Active, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
-
NCT06875427RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Tear
-
NCT04295148RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
NCT05423184CompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
NCT06430775RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | ACL | ACL Injury | ACL Tear | Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition | Arthrogenic Muscle Responses
Clinical Trials on Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair
-
NCT02074917UnknownComplete Tear, Knee, Anterior Cruciate Ligament | Rupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament
-
NCT02833454UnknownRupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament
-
NCT01377129TerminatedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
-
NCT01358656UnknownAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
-
NCT04408690CompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
-
NCT05747079Recruiting
-
NCT06617559RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Athletic Injuries | Tendon Graft; Complications
-
NCT05580133Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05180123RecruitingKnee Instability | ACL Injuries