Digital Impression in Neonates
Diagnostic Evaluation and Guardian Assessment of Using Digital Impression in Neonates Versus the Conventional Techniques.
The goal of this [clinical trial] is to [explore the attitudes of guardians with different educational background regarding the technique of impression registration as well as the compliance to using feeding appliances ] in [neonates].
Researchers will compare [conventional impression technique to digital impression]
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt
- Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate
- neonates
Exclusion Criteria:
- infants and children
- bilateral cleft lip and palatal
- incomplete cleft lip
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional impression
|
Palatal impressions obtained using an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material
|
|
Experimental: Digital impression
|
after obtaining stone models from conventional impression material, stone models were scanned using the I700 (Medit) scanner and Patients were directly scanned intraorally using an intraoral 3D scanner Subsequently, the printed 3D model scan data of the seven patients were then used for standard triangulated language (STL)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Deviation of linear measurments
Time Frame: up to 1 month
|
The stone models obtained from conventional methods and 3D printed models obtained from the intraoral scanning were measured directly three times using an Vernier Fowler Calipers (WESTport Corporation, NY.),
|
up to 1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of gaurdian' perception and experience
Time Frame: up to 1 month
|
The assessment of mothers' perception and experience regarding Pre-surgical infant orthopedics (PSIO) was executed using 16 validated preformed question. A questionnaire assess parents' satisfaction concerning PSIO |
up to 1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Digital_impression_neonates_23
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.