Efficacy of Micronized Natural Progesterone vs GnRH Antagonist in the Prevention of LH Peak During Ovarian Stimulation. (PRO_NAT)
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Micronized Natural Progesterone (Seidigestan®) vs GnRH Antagonist (Astarté®) in the Prevention of LH Peak During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Anna Pitas, PhD
- Phone Number: +34663926079
- Email: apitas@institutobernabeu.com
Study Locations
-
-
Alicante
-
Elche, Alicante, Spain, 03206
- Instituto Bernabeu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Eligibility for the oocyte donation program at Instituto Bernabeu.
- Age between 18 and 33 years
- BMI >18 and <30
- Overall antral follicle count >8
- Presence of both ovaries
- Ability to participate and comply with the study protocol
- Oral and written comprehension of Spanish
- Having given written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Endometriosis at any stage
- Any ovarian tumor whether benign or malignant
- Concurrent participation in another study
- Malabsorptive syndromes that may alter the efficacy of Seidigestan ® such as bariatric surgery, ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease
- Irregular periods
- Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
- Having received in the previous two months treatment with ovulation stimulators
- Having previously participated in the present study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: CONTROL GROUP
The patient will start to administer: (1) daily subcutaneous injections of gonadotropins on day 1 of ovarian stimulation (2) daily subcutenous injections of ganirelix ("antagonist") on day 5 or 6 of ovarian stimulation.
Both medication will be stopped 1-2 days before egg retrieval.
|
The patients in the control group will administer subcutaneaous injections of ganirelix from day 5-6 of stimulation as per currently used protocol.
|
|
Experimental: STUDY GROUP
The patient will start to administer: (1) daily subcutaneous injections of gonadotropins on day 1 of ovarian stimulation (2) daily oral capsules of natural micronized progesterone on day 1 of ovarian stimulation.
Both medication will be stopped 1-2 days before egg retrieval.
|
The patients in the study group will administer oral natural micronized progesterone capsules from day 1 of ovarian stimulation instead of "antagonist" (ganirelix) subcutaneaous injections from day 5-6 of stimulation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
MII oocytes
Time Frame: Egg collection day (between 8 and 14 days after starting of ovarian stimulation)
|
number of mature (MII) oocytes in both stimulations.
|
Egg collection day (between 8 and 14 days after starting of ovarian stimulation)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration
Time Frame: Egg collection day (between 8 and 14 days after starting of ovarian stimulation)
|
duration of ovarian stimulation under both protocols.
|
Egg collection day (between 8 and 14 days after starting of ovarian stimulation)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kuang Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Wang Y, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Shoham Z. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 May 5.
- Begueria R, Garcia D, Vassena R, Rodriguez A. Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034.
- Yu S, Long H, Chang HY, Liu Y, Gao H, Zhu J, Quan X, Lyu Q, Kuang Y, Ai A. New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex367.
- Giles J, Alama P, Gamiz P, Vidal C, Badia P, Pellicer A, Bosch E. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a useful alternative to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in oocyte donation: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2021 Aug;116(2):404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
- Macklon NS, Stouffer RL, Giudice LC, Fauser BC. The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Endocr Rev. 2006 Apr;27(2):170-207. doi: 10.1210/er.2005-0015. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
- A double-blind, randomized, dose-finding study to assess the efficacy of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix (Org 37462) to prevent premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon). The ganirelix dose-finding study group. Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3023-31.
- Balasch J, Creus M, Fabregues F, Carmona F, Casamitjana R, Penarrubia J, Rivera F, Vanrell JA. Hormonal profiles in successful and unsuccessful implantation in IVF-ET after combined GnRH agonist/gonadotropin treatment for superovulation and hCG luteal support. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1995 Mar;9(1):51-8. doi: 10.3109/09513599509160191.
- Castillo JC, Haahr T, Martinez-Moya M, Humaidan P. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for ovulation trigger - OHSS prevention and use of modified luteal phase support for fresh embryo transfer. Ups J Med Sci. 2020 May;125(2):131-137. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1736696. Epub 2020 May 4.
- Fauser BC, Devroey P. Why is the clinical acceptance of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cotreatment during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization so slow? Fertil Steril. 2005 Jun;83(6):1607-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.011.
- Griesinger G, Dawson A, Schultze-Mosgau A, Finas D, Diedrich K, Felberbaum R. Assessment of luteinizing hormone level in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. Fertil Steril. 2006 Mar;85(3):791-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.048.
- Guo YC, Chen PY, Li TT, Jia L, Sun P, Zhu WS, Deng CC, Fang C, Liang XY. Different progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocols in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an analysis of 1188 cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;299(4):1201-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05065-4. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
- Messinis IE, Templeton AA. Endocrine and follicle characteristics of cycles with and without endogenous luteinizing hormone surges during superovulation induction with pulsatile follicle-stimulating hormone. Hum Reprod. 1987 Jan;2(1):11-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136481.
- Porter RN, Smith W, Craft IL, Abdulwahid NA, Jacobs HS. Induction of ovulation for in-vitro fertilisation using buserelin and gonadotropins. Lancet. 1984 Dec 1;2(8414):1284-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92840-x. No abstract available.
- Zhu X, Ye H, Fu Y. Duphaston and human menopausal gonadotropin protocol in normally ovulatory women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatments in combination with embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):505-512.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
- Martinez-Moya M, Guerrero J, Girela JL, Pitas A, Bernabeu A, Bernabeu R, Castillo JC. Micronized natural progesterone (Seidigestan(R)) vs GnRH antagonists for preventing the LH surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (PRO_NAT study): study protocol of a randomized clinical trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 21;15:1350154. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1350154. eCollection 2024.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IBMR43
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.