NMDA Receptor Modulation for the Treatment of Bipolar I Disorder
NMDA Receptor Modulation for the Treatment of Cognitive Impairment and Perceived Stress in Bipolar I Disorder
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Bipolar I disorder (BD-I) is a severe brain disorder. At present, the treatment of BD-I, especially its depressive episode (bipolar depression), is still limited, because there is no effective treatment for the associated cognitive impairment and perceived stress. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of an NMDA enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of cognitive impairment and perceived stress in the patients with bipolar depression.
The subjects are bipolar depression patients. They have been treated for bipolar depression for at least four weeks but remain depressive. Participating in this study, they will continue the original treatment, and will be randomized, double-blindly to receive the NMDAE or placebo for 8 weeks. We will measure 6 cognitive domains (including 9 cognitive tests) and quality of life at weeks 0 and 8; and assess the Perceived Stress Scale, Global Assessment of Function (GAF), various scales for clinical symptoms, and side effects at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8.
The efficacies of NMDAE and placebo will be compared. Chi-square (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to compare differences of categorical variables and t-test (or Mann-Whitney test if the distribution is not normal) for continuous variables between treatment groups. Mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE). All p values for clinical measures will be based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Hsien-Yuan Lane Lane, M.D., Ph.D
- Phone Number: 1855 886 4 22052121
- Email: hylane@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taichung, Taiwan
- Recruiting
- Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D
- Phone Number: 1855 886 4 22052121
- Email: hylane@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Are 18 to 65 years of age;
- Satisfy a DSM-5-TR (American Psychiatric Association) diagnosis of BD-I, current episode depressed, after treatment of stable (i.e., at least 4 weeks) and adequate treatment of antipsychotic (quetiapine or lurasidone) and/or mood stabilizer;
- Have a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score ≥18 and a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score ≤7 at baseline;
- Agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current substance abuse or history of substance dependence in the past 6 months
- History of epilepsy, head trauma, stroke or other serious medical or neurological illness which may interfere with the study
- Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder
- Moderate-severe suicidal risks
- Severe cognitive impairment
- Clinically significant laboratory screening tests (including blood routine, biochemical tests)
- Pregnancy or lactation;
- Inability to follow protocol
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
Use of placebo as a comparator.
|
|
Experimental: NMDAE
An NMDA enhancer
|
Use of an NMDA enhancer for the treatment of bipolar depression
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Digit Span
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
Assessment of verbal working memory
|
week 0, 8
|
|
Spatial Span
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
Assessment of nonverbal working memory
|
week 0, 8
|
|
Category Fluency
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
Assessment of speed of processing
|
week 0, 8
|
|
Trail Marking A
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
Assessment of speed of processing
|
week 0, 8
|
|
WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
Assessment of speed of processing
|
week 0, 8
|
|
Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) V2.0
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
Assessment of social cognition
|
week 0, 8
|
|
Change in Visual Continuous Performance Test
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
Assessment of sustained attention
|
week 0, 8
|
|
Change in Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
Assessment of abstract and shift set
|
week 0, 8
|
|
Change in Logical Memory Test of the Wechsler Memory Scale
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
Assessment of episodic memory
|
week 0, 8
|
|
Change in Perceived Stress Scale in Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
Assessment of stress and anxiety symptoms Minimum value: 0, maximum value:56, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
|
week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of life (SF-36)
Time Frame: week 0, 8
|
week 0, 8
|
|
|
Change in Global Assessmeint of Functioning
Time Frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
Assessment of global improvement.
Minimum value: 1, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
|
Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
Time Frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Minimum value: 0, maximum value:52, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
|
Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
|
Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Minimum value: 0, maximum value:60, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
|
Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
|
Change in Young Mania Rating Scale
Time Frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
Assessment of manic symptoms.
Minimum value: 0, maximum value:60, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
|
Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
|
Change in Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
Assessment of Suicide Ideation.
Minimum value: 0, maximum value:38, the higher scores mean a greater risk of suicide.
|
Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
|
Change in Clinical Global Impression Scale
Time Frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CMUH111-REC2-222
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.