The Accuracy of Computer Software Prediction of Soft Tissue Profile for Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: salah hasan, gp
- Phone Number: 01125237178
- Email: dr.salah.hassan.1995@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Assuit
-
Assiut, Assuit, Egypt, 12345
- Recruiting
- Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University
-
Contact:
- abd-AlAziz A baioumy, professor
- Phone Number: 0020882181056
- Email: aadj@azhar.edu.eg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
The inclusion criteria included:
- Patient undergo fixed orthodontic treatment with the edgewise technique.
- Skeletal class I.
- Dental class I or II or III.
- Final class I occlusion without spacing or crowding, with normal overjet and overbite (2-4 mm)
- Availability of full diagnostic and therapeutic records before to and following orthodontic treatment, including medical and dental history, dental casts, panoramic and cephalometric x-rays, and photographic photographs.
The exclusion criteria included:
- Missing tooth or significant Bolton discrepancies (more than 3 mm).
- Craniofacial syndromes or skeletal abnormalities.
- Failed orthodontic treatment in the past.
- Cosmetic or reconstructive facial surgery during orthodontic treatment, or up to a year beforehand.
- Using drugs that could reduce the volume of soft tissues.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
A
real photoes (after treatment)
|
Separate analyses will be performed on the initial and final cephalograms.
Other Names:
|
|
B
simulated photoes
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
accuracy of computer software in predicting soft tissue profile changes
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Licciardello V, Barbato E. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):211-6. doi: 10.2319/010709-16.1.
- Kolokitha OE, Chatzistavrou E. Factors influencing the accuracy of cephalometric prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012 Mar;11(1):82-90. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0253-6. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
- Kolokitha OE. Validity of a manual soft tissue profile prediction method following mandibular setback osteotomy. Eur J Dent. 2007 Oct;1(4):202-11.
- Drobocky OB, Smith RJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Mar;95(3):220-30. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90052-8.
- Al-Omiri MK, Abu Alhaija ES. Factors affecting patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):422-31. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0422:FAPSAO]2.0.CO;2.
- Kolokitha OE, Topouzelis N. Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011 Sep;10(3):236-45. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0228-7. Epub 2011 May 17.
- Smith JD, Thomas PM, Proffit WR. A comparison of current prediction imaging programs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 May;125(5):527-36. doi: 10.1016/S0889540604001210.
- Patterson Dental Supply. Imaging. In: Dolphin Imaging. 2012. Retrieved December 17th 2012, from http://www.dolphinimaging.com/imaging.html.
- Gossett CB, Preston CB, Dunford R, Lampasso J. Prediction accuracy of computer-assisted surgical visual treatment objectives as compared with conventional visual treatment objectives. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 May;63(5):609-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.01.004.
- Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Papamanou DA, Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontics and esthetics of the face: from the "canons" of ancient times to contemporary pluralism. A critical review. Prog Orthod. 2008;9(2):20-33.
- Prabhakar R, Rajakumar P, Karthikeyan MK, Saravanan R, Vikram NR, Reddy A. A hard tissue cephalometric comparative study between hand tracing and computerized tracing. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014 Jul;6(Suppl 1):S101-6. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.137401.
- Nadjmi N, Tehranchi A, Azami N, Saedi B, Mollemans W. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):654-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.019.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- VTO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.