Diagnostic Accuracy of Saline Sonohystrography vs. 3D Transvaginal Ultrasound for Cesarean Scar Defect Assessment

August 10, 2023 updated by: Israa Bahaa Hassan Sherif, Cairo University

Diagnostic Correlation Between Saline Infused Sonohystrography and Three Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound in the Assessment of Cesarean Section Scar Defect. A Study of a Diagnostic Test Accuracy

To compare accuracy of three dimensional transvaginal ultrasound versus the "gold standard" saline infused sonography for assessing the characteristics, frequency and appearance of caesarean scar defects in symptomatic patients with a history of cesarean section.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cesarean section (CS) is a frequently performed surgical procedure in obstetric practice. With a significant number of women undergoing this procedure annually, studying its impact on future reproductive capacity has become increasingly important.

The prevalence of cesarean deliveries is rising and constitutes about one-third of all births in both the USA and Italy. As the use of cesarean delivery increases, so do the associated complications, including cesarean scar pregnancy, morbidly adherent placenta, and Cesarean section scar dehiscence and rupture.

Cesarean scar defects (CSD) are described using various terms (pouch, niche, or isthmocoele) and are characterized by thinning of the myometrium or a uterine scar dehiscence, often appearing as a triangular shape within the endometrial cavity.

The exact prevalence of symptomatic Cesarean scar defects varies due to factors like population differences and lack of standardized criteria. Clinical presentations of Cesarean scar defects range from no symptoms to abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility, dyspareunia, and pelvic pain.

Women with a history of Cesarean section are considered high-risk during pregnancy and require specialized assessments to ensure scar integrity. Saline-infused sonography (Sonohystrography) is effective for demonstrating caesarean niches, although transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is more accessible and commonly used.

Experts generally agree that a niche should be defined by an indentation at the CS scar site with a depth of at least 2 mm, and it can be classified as simple, simple with one branch, or complex with multiple branches. Additional measurements, such as the distances between the niche and the vesicovaginal fold, are useful for surgical planning.

Given the increasing frequency of cesarean deliveries, healthcare providers will encounter related complications more frequently. Cesarean scar defects are common yet often go undiagnosed. Encouraging vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) can help reduce cesarean rates and raise questions about future obstetric practices, especially in developing countries.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Ain shams university
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 20 and 45 years
  • Previous 1-3 cesarean sections
  • The duration from the last cesarean section ranging from 6 months to 5 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy (Positive pregnancy test)
  • Recent pelvic infection.
  • Active pelvic infection.
  • Recent surgery on the tubes or the uterus.
  • Active vaginal bleeding.
  • Menstruation.
  • Suspected malignancy.
  • Intrauterine device in situ.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound (3D TVS)

In this study, Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound will be employed as one of the interventions to evaluate Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD) and associated complications in symptomatic patients with a history of cesarean section.

A specialized ultrasound machine (Samsung WS80A) equipped with a transvaginal 2-11 MHz probe will be used for the Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound examination. The examination will be conducted in the 1st half of the menstrual cycle. The ultrasound probe will be introduced into the posterior fornix of the vagina to capture three-dimensional images of the uterus and scar area. The examiner will identify and measure the characteristics of the Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD), including length, depth, width, volume, residual myometrial thickness, adjacent myometrial thickness, and presence of any branches.
Diagnostic test: Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound (3D TVS)

In this study, Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound will be employed as one of the interventions to evaluate Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD) and associated complications in symptomatic patients with a history of cesarean section.

Procedure: A specialized ultrasound machine (Samsung WS80A) equipped with a transvaginal 2-11 MHz probe will be used for the Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound examination. The examination will be conducted in the 1st half of the menstrual cycle. The ultrasound probe will be introduced into the posterior fornix of the vagina to capture three-dimensional images of the uterus and scar area. The examiner will identify and measure the characteristics of the Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD), including length, depth, width, volume, residual myometrial thickness, adjacent myometrial thickness, and presence of any branches.
Experimental: Saline-Infused Sonography (Sonohystrography)
The Sonohystrography will be performed using a Toshiba ECCO CEE SSA-340A ultrasound equipment with a 7.5 MHz transvaginal probe. A sterile vaginal speculum will be inserted, the cervix cleansed with an antiseptic solution, and a thin Foley's catheter inserted into the cervical os. Sterile saline solution will be infused into the uterus through the catheter to distend the uterine cavity. The examiner will use the ultrasound probe to visualize and assess the uterine cavity, focusing on identifying and measuring Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD) characteristics, including depth, width, volume, and myometrial thickness.
Diagnostic test: Saline-Infused Sonography (Sonohystrography)
The Sonohystrography will be performed using a Toshiba ECCO CEE SSA-340A ultrasound equipment with a 7.5 MHz transvaginal probe. A sterile vaginal speculum will be inserted, the cervix cleansed with an antiseptic solution, and a thin Foley's catheter inserted into the cervical os. Sterile saline solution will be infused into the uterus through the catheter to distend the uterine cavity. The examiner will use the ultrasound probe to visualize and assess the uterine cavity, focusing on identifying and measuring Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD) characteristics, including depth, width, volume, and myometrial thickness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of Cesarean Scar Defect Assessment Using 3D TVS
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
This outcome measure aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D TVS) as measurement tools in assessing Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD) and associated complications among symptomatic patients with a history of cesarean section. The assessment will involve identifying, classifying, and measuring Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD) characteristics using these specific measurement techniques.
Intraoperatively
Diagnostic Accuracy of Cesarean Scar Defect Assessment Using Saline-Infused Sonography
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
This outcome measure aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of saline-infused sonography (Sonohystrography) as measurement tools in assessing Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD) and associated complications among symptomatic patients with a history of cesarean section. The assessment will involve identifying, classifying, and measuring Cesarean Scar Defects (CSD) characteristics using these specific measurement techniques.
Intraoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 10, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FMASU MD25/2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The study protocol will be available upon a reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

One you after the end of the study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings