Dimensional Changes in Single Crowns Supported by Short Transmucosal Implants With Diverging or Converging Neck Profiles in the Esthetic Zone
Long-term Dimensional Changes in Single Crowns Supported by Short (6 mm) Transmucosal Implants With Divergent or Convergent Neck Profiles in the Esthetic Zone. A Randomized Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
The goal of the present randomized clinical trial is to assess the long-term osseous and peri-implant soft tissue changes as well as the success rate of short implants (6 mm) with a converging collar with micro threads or a diverging polished collar placed in the esthetic zone of the maxilla on partially edentulous patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- what are the long-term bone and soft tissue changes around implants with a converging collar with micro threads compared to a diverging polished collar placed in the esthetic zone of the maxilla?
- What is the success rate of implants with a converging collar with micro threads compared to a diverging polished collar placed in the esthetic zone of the maxilla? Dental implants with a converging collar with micro threads or a diverging polished collar will be placed in the esthetic zone of the maxilla of the included participants and the measurements regarding the bone and soft tissue level will be compared.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Daniele Botticelli, PhD
- Phone Number: +393339070450
- Email: daniele.botticelli@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Karol Ali Apaza alccayhuaman, PhD
- Phone Number: +436769178911
- Email: karol.ali.apazaa@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
La Libertad
-
Trujillo, La Libertad, Peru, 13001
- Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of at least two edentulous areas in the esthetic region of the maxilla (from right to left from second premolar to premolar, preferably first premolars and incisors)
- Alveolar bone ≥ 8 mm in height and ≥ 5 mm in thickness assessed on CBCT.
- Age of ≥ 21 years.
- Need for an implant-supported prosthetic restoration.
- Be in good general health with no contraindications to oral surgical procedures.
- Not be pregnant.
- Patients who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The presence of any uncontrolled systemic disease.
- History of past or ongoing chemotherapeutic or radiotherapeutic treatments.
- Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes per day).
- Previous bone regeneration procedures in the area of interest
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: dental implant with a convergent collar
One implant with a converging collar with micro threads will be installed in each patient according to the site randomization in the esthetic region of the upper jaw (between the second premolars).
|
surgery for placement of two one-piece trans gingival implants
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: dental implant with a divergent collar
One implant with a diverging polished collar will be installed in each patient according to the site randomization in the esthetic region of the upper jaw ( between the second premolars).
|
surgery for placement of two one-piece trans gingival implants
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
height of the periimplant bone tissues
Time Frame: baseline
|
The height of the periimplant bone tissues will be evaluated in the intraoral radiographic images, cone beam tomography, and the three-dimensional images obtained from the digital prints
|
baseline
|
|
height of the periimplant bone tissues
Time Frame: 3 years follow up
|
The height of the periimplant bone tissues will be evaluated in the intraoral radiographic images, cone beam tomography, and the three-dimensional images obtained from the digital prints
|
3 years follow up
|
|
height of the periimplant soft tissues
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The height of the periimplant soft tissues will be evaluated in the intraoral radiographic images, cone beam tomography, and the three-dimensional images obtained from the digital prints
|
Baseline
|
|
height of the periimplant soft tissues
Time Frame: 3 years follow up
|
The height of the periimplant soft tissues will be evaluated in the intraoral radiographic images, cone beam tomography, and the three-dimensional images obtained from the digital prints
|
3 years follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 1 year
|
to score the plaque accumulation of plaque around implants will be used the Mombelli et al index
|
1 year
|
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 3 year
|
to score the plaque accumulation of plaque around implants will be used the Mombelli et al index
|
3 year
|
|
Bleeding on probing
Time Frame: 1 year
|
During the probing, the bleeding on probing will be registered in the periodontal record.
|
1 year
|
|
Bleeding on probing
Time Frame: 3 year
|
During the probing, the bleeding on probing will be registered in the periodontal record.
|
3 year
|
|
Probing depth
Time Frame: 1 year
|
A calibrated probe will be used to measure the probing depth in all teeth annually.
|
1 year
|
|
Probing depth
Time Frame: 3 year
|
A calibrated probe will be used to measure the probing depth in all teeth annually.
|
3 year
|
|
Implant success rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The criteria to evaluate the success rate will be if there was no persistent and/or irreversible signs or symptoms such as pain, infection, neuropathies, or paresthesia, no peri-implant infection with suppuration, no mobility, and no continuous radiolucency around the implant.
|
1 year
|
|
Implant success rate
Time Frame: 3 years
|
The criteria to evaluate the success rate will be if there was no persistent and/or irreversible signs or symptoms such as pain, infection, neuropathies, or paresthesia, no peri-implant infection with suppuration, no mobility, and no continuous radiolucency around the implant.
|
3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Caneva M, Lang NP, Calvo Guirado JL, Spriano S, Iezzi G, Botticelli D. Bone healing at bicortically installed implants with different surface configurations. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):293-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12475. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
- Agustin-Panadero R, Martinez-Martinez N, Fernandez-Estevan L, Faus-Lopez J, Sola-Ruiz MF. Influence of Transmucosal Area Morphology on Peri-Implant Bone Loss in Tissue-Level Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;(34):947-952. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7329. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
- Altaib FH, Alqutaibi AY, Al-Fahd A, Eid S. Short dental implant as alternative to long implant with bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior ridge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(8):636-650. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a42948.
- Bitaraf T, Keshtkar A, Rokn AR, Monzavi A, Geramy A, Hashemi K. Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):796-812. doi: 10.1111/cid.12774. Epub 2019 May 1.
- Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Apr;22(2):109-17.
- Doyle AD, Wang FW, Matsumoto K, Yamada KM. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J Cell Biol. 2009 Feb 23;184(4):481-90. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200810041. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
- Hermann JS, Jones AA, Bakaeen LG, Buser D, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2011 Sep;82(9):1329-38. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.090728. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
- Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Vazouras K, Gholami H, Pagni S, Weber HP. Survival rates of short dental implants (</=6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:8-20. doi: 10.1111/clr.13289.
- Ravida A, Majzoub J, Alassadi M, Saleh MH, Askar H, Wang HL. Impact of Implant Length on Survival of Rough-Surface Implants in Nonaugmented Posterior Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):1359-1369. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7509.
- Ravida A, Wang IC, Sammartino G, Barootchi S, Tattan M, Troiano G, Laino L, Marenzi G, Covani U, Wang HL. Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Posterior Atrophic Maxilla, Short (</=6 mm) or Long (>/=10 mm) Dental Implants? A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group A. Implant Dent. 2019 Dec;28(6):590-602. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000919.
- Rodriguez X, Navajas A, Vela X, Fortuno A, Jimenez J, Nevins M. Arrangement of Peri-implant Connective Tissue Fibers Around Platform-Switching Implants with Conical Abutments and Its Relationship to the Underlying Bone: A Human Histologic Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):533-40. doi: 10.11607/prd.2580.
- Rossi F, Botticelli D, Cesaretti G, De Santis E, Storelli S, Lang NP. Use of short implants (6 mm) in a single-tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):458-64. doi: 10.1111/clr.12564. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
- Rossi F, Lang NP, Ricci E, Ferraioli L, Baldi N, Botticelli D. Long-term follow-up of single crowns supported by short, moderately rough implants-A prospective 10-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Dec;29(12):1212-1219. doi: 10.1111/clr.13386. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
- Rossi F, Lang NP, Ricci E, Ferraioli L, Marchetti C, Botticelli D. 6-mm-long implants loaded with fiber-reinforced composite resin-bonded fixed prostheses (FRCRBFDPs). A 5-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Dec;28(12):1478-1483. doi: 10.1111/clr.13015. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
- Storelli S, Abba A, Scanferla M, Botticelli D, Romeo E. 6 mm vs 10 mm-long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior jaws: A 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(3):283-292.
- Szathvary I, Caneva M, Caneva M, Bressan E, Botticelli D, Meneghello R. A volumetric 3-D digital analysis of dimensional changes to the alveolar process at implants placed immediately into extraction sockets. J Oral Science Rehabilitation. 2015 Sep;1(1):62-9.
- Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Subcrestal placement of two-part implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Mar;20(3):226-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01637.x.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UNT_short implants
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.