Safety and Efficacy Assessments of NeoKidney® in ESRD Patients Treated With Short Daily Hemodialysis (FIH Caen)
Safety and Efficacy Assessments of NeoKidney®, a New Sorbent-based Hemodialysis Device, in ESRD Patients Treated With Short Daily Hemodialysis: a First in Human Use.
The goal of this clinical investigation is to asses the safety and efficacy a new sorbent-based hemodialysis device, NeoKidney® in ESRD patients treated with short daily hemodialysis.
Participants (stable SDHD patients) will undergo hemodialysis treatement on the NeoKidney® device at the hospital on a progressive exposition to the device:
- The first week, patient will be treated once with NeoKidney® on Wednesday
- The 2nd week the patient will be treated two consecutive days with NeoKidney® (in the middle of the week)
- On the 3rd week, after approval by the DSMB, the patients will be treated 6 consecutive days, in hospital, with the NeoKidney
All the other sessions will be performed with the patient's usual SDHD device at home except for two sessions prior to NeoKidney® sessions at Week 1 and 2.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Baptiste Juillard
- Phone Number: +33 1 89 81 71 24
- Email: baptiste.juillard@monitoring-force.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Amin Kadi, Dr
- Phone Number: +33 1 89 81 71 24
- Email: amin.kadi@monitoring-force.fr
Study Locations
-
-
Normandie
-
Caen, Normandie, France, 14000
- Recruiting
- CHU de Caen
-
Contact:
- Maxence Ficheux, Dr
- Email: ficheux-m@chu-caen.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- Maxence Ficheux, Dr
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Patrick Henry, Dr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female aged 18 years or over;
- Treated with short-daily hemodialysis (1.5-3 h sessions) 5-6 times a week for at least 3 months;
- Estimated Urea removal concentration between [220 to 550] mmol. (Estimation based on the formula: ([Dry Weigh in kg]*] x 0,6)*([) x ([Last pre-dialysis urea concentration in mmol/L]*] x 0,5).
Well-functioning vascular access (native fistula or graft or permanent veinous catheter) defined as:
- Capable of providing a blood flow rate of ≥200 mL/min, AND
- Absence of vascular access revision for at least 3 months
- For females of reproducible age, negative urinary pregnancy test and use of appropriate birth control method(s);
- Ability to understand the informed consent and give informed consent;
- Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures and to attend all study follow up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Post-dialysis body weight below 41.0 kg
- Hb <10.0 g/L, or pre-dialysis [Na] < 132 and > 145 mmol/L, pre-dialysis [K] < 3.5 and > 6 mmol/L and pre-dialysis [HCO3] < 15 and > 30 mmol/L in the latest determination, within the 6 weeks prior to enrollment.
- One or more pre-dialysis urea concentration <10 mmol/L or >30mmol/L within the 6 weeks prior to enrollment.
- Subjects requiring UF volume >2.0L per 2hr treatment in any dialysis session within 6 weeks prior to enrollment.
- Any documented episode of hemolysis within the 6 months prior to enrolment.
- Any infection related to the vascular access within the 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
- History of impaired liver function (normal Factor V).
- Severe uncontrolled arterial hypertension (systolic BP>180mmHg or diastolic BP >104 mmHg).
- Known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Anticipation of a living donor kidney transplantation within the 2 months of the study period.
- Pregnant, breast feeding, or planning a pregnancy during the study period.
13. Any known psychosocial problems which may negatively influence dialysis treatment.
14. History of drug and/or alcohol abuse within the last 3 months prior to enrolment.
15. Patients with any serious medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator, may adversely affect the safety of the participant and/or effectiveness of the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: NeoKidney therapy
Every patient will receive NeoKidney therapy which will be referenced to SDHD sessions with the usual device as their own baseline. The study is designed in a way that allows an incremental increase of the ratio of NeoKidney versus SDHD sessions with the usual device. In order to minimize the study burden to the patient, most SDHD sessions with the usual device will be done in the patient's home. The NeoKidney therapy sessions, and 2 SDHD sessions with the usual device will be performed in the study center, thus ensuring the necessary patient care and observation as well as sample collection. |
Progressive exposition to NeoKidney device starting with only one NeoKidney therapy on a mid-week day and 5 SDHD sessions with the usual device in week one, followed by 2 NeoKidney therapies and 4 SDHD sessions with the usual device in week 2, and only progressing to a full week on NeoKidney after a safety review.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Absence of serious adverse events (SAE) and of serious adverse device effects (SADE).
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in patient's blood pressure (mm Hg) during treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on patient's clinical condition and vital parameters, in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in patient's heart rate (bpm) during treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on patient's clinical condition and vital parameters, in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in patient's body temperature (°C) during treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on patient's clinical condition and vital parameters, in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in patient's pulse oximetry (% SpO2) during treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on patient's clinical condition and vital parameters, in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in bicarbonates (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in pH pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in LDH (UI/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in Haptoglobin (g/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in Sodium (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in Potassium (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in Phosphate (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in Calcium (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in Chlorine (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in Magnesium (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
|
Absence of critical change in Magnesium (µmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
|
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maxence Ficheux, Dr, University Hospital, Caen
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NKH-CI22-01
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.