Safety and Efficacy Assessments of NeoKidney® in ESRD Patients Treated With Short Daily Hemodialysis (FIH Caen)

March 19, 2024 updated by: Nextkidney S.A.

Safety and Efficacy Assessments of NeoKidney®, a New Sorbent-based Hemodialysis Device, in ESRD Patients Treated With Short Daily Hemodialysis: a First in Human Use.

The goal of this clinical investigation is to asses the safety and efficacy a new sorbent-based hemodialysis device, NeoKidney® in ESRD patients treated with short daily hemodialysis.

Participants (stable SDHD patients) will undergo hemodialysis treatement on the NeoKidney® device at the hospital on a progressive exposition to the device:

  • The first week, patient will be treated once with NeoKidney® on Wednesday
  • The 2nd week the patient will be treated two consecutive days with NeoKidney® (in the middle of the week)
  • On the 3rd week, after approval by the DSMB, the patients will be treated 6 consecutive days, in hospital, with the NeoKidney

All the other sessions will be performed with the patient's usual SDHD device at home except for two sessions prior to NeoKidney® sessions at Week 1 and 2.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Normandie
      • Caen, Normandie, France, 14000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Caen
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maxence Ficheux, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Patrick Henry, Dr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female aged 18 years or over;
  2. Treated with short-daily hemodialysis (1.5-3 h sessions) 5-6 times a week for at least 3 months;
  3. Estimated Urea removal concentration between [220 to 550] mmol. (Estimation based on the formula: ([Dry Weigh in kg]*] x 0,6)*([) x ([Last pre-dialysis urea concentration in mmol/L]*] x 0,5).
  4. Well-functioning vascular access (native fistula or graft or permanent veinous catheter) defined as:

    • Capable of providing a blood flow rate of ≥200 mL/min, AND
    • Absence of vascular access revision for at least 3 months
  5. For females of reproducible age, negative urinary pregnancy test and use of appropriate birth control method(s);
  6. Ability to understand the informed consent and give informed consent;
  7. Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures and to attend all study follow up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Post-dialysis body weight below 41.0 kg
  2. Hb <10.0 g/L, or pre-dialysis [Na] < 132 and > 145 mmol/L, pre-dialysis [K] < 3.5 and > 6 mmol/L and pre-dialysis [HCO3] < 15 and > 30 mmol/L in the latest determination, within the 6 weeks prior to enrollment.
  3. One or more pre-dialysis urea concentration <10 mmol/L or >30mmol/L within the 6 weeks prior to enrollment.
  4. Subjects requiring UF volume >2.0L per 2hr treatment in any dialysis session within 6 weeks prior to enrollment.
  5. Any documented episode of hemolysis within the 6 months prior to enrolment.
  6. Any infection related to the vascular access within the 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
  7. History of impaired liver function (normal Factor V).
  8. Severe uncontrolled arterial hypertension (systolic BP>180mmHg or diastolic BP >104 mmHg).
  9. Known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  10. Anticipation of a living donor kidney transplantation within the 2 months of the study period.
  11. Pregnant, breast feeding, or planning a pregnancy during the study period.

13. Any known psychosocial problems which may negatively influence dialysis treatment.

14. History of drug and/or alcohol abuse within the last 3 months prior to enrolment.

15. Patients with any serious medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator, may adversely affect the safety of the participant and/or effectiveness of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NeoKidney therapy

Every patient will receive NeoKidney therapy which will be referenced to SDHD sessions with the usual device as their own baseline.

The study is designed in a way that allows an incremental increase of the ratio of NeoKidney versus SDHD sessions with the usual device. In order to minimize the study burden to the patient, most SDHD sessions with the usual device will be done in the patient's home. The NeoKidney therapy sessions, and 2 SDHD sessions with the usual device will be performed in the study center, thus ensuring the necessary patient care and observation as well as sample collection.

Progressive exposition to NeoKidney device starting with only one NeoKidney therapy on a mid-week day and 5 SDHD sessions with the usual device in week one, followed by 2 NeoKidney therapies and 4 SDHD sessions with the usual device in week 2, and only progressing to a full week on NeoKidney after a safety review.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absence of serious adverse events (SAE) and of serious adverse device effects (SADE).
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in patient's blood pressure (mm Hg) during treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on patient's clinical condition and vital parameters, in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in patient's heart rate (bpm) during treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on patient's clinical condition and vital parameters, in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in patient's body temperature (°C) during treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on patient's clinical condition and vital parameters, in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in patient's pulse oximetry (% SpO2) during treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on patient's clinical condition and vital parameters, in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in bicarbonates (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in pH pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in LDH (UI/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in Haptoglobin (g/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in Sodium (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in Potassium (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in Phosphate (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in Calcium (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in Chlorine (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in Magnesium (mmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
Absence of critical change in Magnesium (µmol/L) pre- vs post-treatment
Time Frame: Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months
To assess the safety of the NeoKidney on hematology and clinical chemistry pre- vs post-treatment in a small number (n=3) of patients and HD sessions (9 sessions per patient).
Through the end of last patient follow-up visit, an average of 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maxence Ficheux, Dr, University Hospital, Caen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NKH-CI22-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.