Effect of Proprioceptive Training Using Head Mounted Laser in Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain

December 1, 2023 updated by: Nouman Khan, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of conventional physical therapy with and without cervical proprioceptive training using head-mounted laser system on cervical joint position sense error, pain, cervical range of motion and neck disability index. Proprioception disturbs in any function and structural impairments that is mechanical neck pain. Different studies has been done to find out the best therapy for pain management. Aim of the researcher is to give cost-effective, not so time-consuming, most effective physical therapy treatment. A literature gap exists on the effects of proprioceptive training combined with conventional physical therapy, no studies have directly compared the effect of proprioceptive training using head-mounted laser with and without conventional physical therapy. In our clinical setting, proprioceptive training for mechanical neck pain is not used as much as it should be. It would be a new thing to add and it can be cost-effective and better treatment for symptoms resolution

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Mechanical neck pain (MNP) is a common condition, affecting 30% to 50% of the general population, and is most prevalent in middle age. It is responsible for reducing the quality of life and one of the leading causes of disability worldwide with annual prevalence of 48.5%. Mechanical neck pain is characterized by several structural and functional features. The causes of MNP include structural and functional impairment of cervical muscles, degenerative changes of cervical spine, arthritis, inflammation, and trauma, abnormal posture, and movements. Current studies have found that one of the main problems in patients with MNP is the impairment of cervical proprioception. decreased range of motion (ROM) and functional ability, greater muscle fatigability and a reduction in the strength and endurance capacity of the muscles.

Despite neck disorders being so common in the population, little evidence supporting effective interventions has been identified. Conservative treatments used to help manage MNP are numerous and include usual medical care various forms of exercise, massage, and acupuncture. Medications, manual therapies, and exercise are the most widely used treatment modalities for MNP. 33% of individuals with neck pain sought care from physical therapy. Physical therapy improves pain, function and patient satisfaction in adults suffering from MNP, improves neck disability index. Physical therapy treatment includes cervical and thoracic spine mobilization/manipulation techniques active and passive exercise, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, patient education. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), trigger point dry needling and trigger point manual therapy.

Proprioception is the sense of perceiving self-movement, action of parts of the body and location. It is a term commonly used to describe the ascending information by the afferent receptors towards the central nervous system contributing to the neuromuscular control of movement and encompasses the sensation of joint movement (kinaesthesia) and joint position (joint position sense). Cervical spine has a very delicate proprioceptive system, which signals the position of the head relative to the trunk, coordinates the vestibular and visual systems and it plays a crucial role in controlling posture and balance and is of great importance for spatial orientation. The deficits of Proprioception of cervical spine have been associated with age, pain muscle fatigue, forward head posture, cervical spondylosis, reduced balance control and abnormal posture, decreased neck muscle strength and altered motor control in the cervical spine.

In last two decades the interest in the assessment and treatment of proprioception of the cervical spine has increased exponentially. Cervical joint position sense (JPS) is a major component of proprioception and mainly reflects the ascending input (afferent) of cervical muscle, disc, capsule, and ligament receptors. Proprioception is evaluated using the Joint Position Sense Error (JPSE), which reflects a person's ability to accurately return his head to a predefined target after a cervical movement.

Evidence to date suggests that the management of sensorimotor control disturbances due to chronic neck pain may need to address the primary causes and secondary effects of alterations in proprioceptive activity. A variety of treatments are available for cervical spine proprioception. It includes proprioception training, retraining of deep cervical flexor and extensor muscles, and etiological management of pain, strength training, cervical manipulation and acupuncture and many other conventional therapy protocols. Cervical proprioception training not only improves patient-perceived pain and disability but also has an effect on other aspects of neuromuscular function, specifically the coordination between the deep and superficial cervical flexors and balance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Fedral
      • Islamabad, Fedral, Pakistan, 44000
        • Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University Islamabad

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both genders
  • Age: 45 to 55 years
  • Mechanical neck pain more than 3 months (chronic stage)
  • Individuals having cervical radiculopathy (Spurling Test A and Spurling test B +ve)
  • Decreased Range of motion (Flexion 80 to 90*) (Extension 70*) (Lateral Flexion 20 TO 45*) (Rotation 90*)
  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale: 5 to 08
  • Cervical spondylosis on Xray

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals having vascular pathology of neck.
  • Previous surgery related to cervical spine.
  • Individuals having structural deformity of spine (Adam's forward bend test)
  • Spinal Cord Injury /Cervical Myelopathy
  • Malignancy and tumor
  • Infection
  • Previous history of Cervical spine fractures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conventional Physical Therapy + Proprioceptive Training Using Head Mounted Laser

Conventional physical therapy along with proprioceptive training, head relocation practice that is relocating the head back to the natural head posture and to pre determined postions in range with eyes open. Tracing figure of eight with eyes open.

3 days per week for 4 weeks, 15 repititions, 1 set.

Exercises include head relocation practice, i.e., relocating the head back to the natural head posture and to pre-determined positions in range with eyes open using feedback from a laser attached to their head. And then tracing the figure of eight with the help of laser.
Conventional physical therapy for mechanical neck pain which includes cervical range of motion (flexion, extension, lateral rotation, and rotation), neck isometric exercises, stretching's (scalene, trapezius, SCM) and TENS with heating pad.
Other: Conventional Physical Therapy only

Conventional physical therapy, cervical range of motion (flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation), isometric exercises of neck muscles, stretching (scalene, trapezius, sternocleidomastoid), TENS, heating pad.

3 days per week for 4 weeks, 15 repitions, 1 set.

Conventional physical therapy for mechanical neck pain which includes cervical range of motion (flexion, extension, lateral rotation, and rotation), neck isometric exercises, stretching's (scalene, trapezius, SCM) and TENS with heating pad.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bubble inclinometer
Time Frame: 4 weeks
use to assess cervical range of motion
4 weeks
cervical joint position sense error
Time Frame: 4 weeks
use to assess proprioception
4 weeks
numerical pain rating scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
used for assessment of pain in which 0 means no pain and 10 means severe pain
4 weeks
neck disability index
Time Frame: 4 weeks
used for pain related disability in which 0-4 means no disability 5-14 means mild disability 15-24 means moderate disability, 25-34 means severe disability and 35-50 means complete disability
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nida Waseem, MS-PT*, Shifa Tameer-e-millet University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB # 0220-23

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.