Right Ventricular Septal Versus Apical Pacing: Echocardiographic Study

September 22, 2023 updated by: Ehdaa Adel Mosallam, Assiut University
This study aims to compare the effect right ventricular apical versus septal pacing on left ventricular function by deformation imaging using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Permanent cardiac pacing is the most efficient treatment for various conduction disorders, including high-degree atrioventricular block and symptomatic sick sinus syndrome. High-burden right ventricular (RV) pacing is often tolerated for decades without overt left ventricular (LV) failure in most patients. It has been shown, however, that prolonged RV pacing reduces LV function and ultimately causes heart failure. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may decrease in specific individuals with pacemaker implants following pacing, which is called Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). However, pacing-induced LV dysfunction (PIVD) at milder severity levels has also been documented.RV apical pacing, the classic site for pacemaker lead implantation, results in ventricular dys-synchrony and deterioration of left ventricular (LV) function and ejection fraction, like left bundle branch block. Recently, alternative sites are arising, such as right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and the septum. Studies show that deformation imaging by speckle tracking echocardiography following pacemaker implantation can predict the patients at higher risk for PCIM and PIVD at long-term follow-up. Deformation imaging, or strain imaging, provides unique Information on regional and global ventricular function. Global longitudinal strain is Known to be more precise than ejection Fraction. It is now used in patients with heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and Receiving chemotherapy to detect early Changes in cardiac function before changes in ejection fraction. Speckle tracking Echocardiography for strain measurement Depends on tracking of speckles throughout the Cardiac cycle in apical 4,3, and 2 chamber Views. The software allows the elaboration of myocardial deformation in 3 spatial directions: Longitudinal, radial, and circumferential. Predicting PICM and PIVD 6 months after pacemaker implantation is possible by measuring global longitudinal strain (GLS) baseline one and six months after implantation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
54

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Fifty-four patients with high degree AV block elicited for permanent pacemaker implantation were enrolled in this study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Any patients older than 18 years with conduction disturbances necessitating pacemaker implantation and
  2. who had preserved LVEF (≥50%) were presented to Assuit University Heart Center.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with impaired systolic function (LVEF <50%).
  2. Ischemic heart disease.
  3. Significant valvular heart disease (moderate to severe).
  4. Pregnancy.
  5. Poor echogenic window.
  6. Patient refusal.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Apical pacing
Study LV strain with speckle Echo when lead of pacemaker on apical site
Device: Patients undergoing DDD pacemaker implantation
compare the effect right ventricular apical versus septal pacing on left ventricular function by deformation imaging using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography.
Septal pacing
Study LV strain with speckle Echo when lead of pacemaker on septal site
Device: Patients undergoing DDD pacemaker implantation
compare the effect right ventricular apical versus septal pacing on left ventricular function by deformation imaging using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Right ventricular apical versus septal pacing Echocardiographic study.
Time Frame: 1year
This study aims to compare the effect right ventricular apical versus septal pacing on left ventricular function by deformation imaging using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography.
1year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LV strain in pacemaker's

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings