AR US Versus sUS or Fluoroscopic Injections for Shoulder Punction
Comparison of Time for Prucedure, and Effectiveness Between Augmented Reality Enhanced Ultrasound-guided Versus Standard Ultrasound or Fluoroscopic Injections
The goal of this clinical trial is to prospectively evaluate the potential benefits of injections with Augmented Reality enhanced Ulrasound versus standard Ultrasound or fluoroscopy participants where assigend for fluoroscopic joint injections oder for Ultrasound guided injection.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- The primary objective is to evaluate the duration of the different interventions
- the count of needle passes
- assess the reduction of radiation exposure using AR US rather than fluoroscopic guidance for joint injections
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients assigned for standard Ultrasound or fluoroscopic joint injection are informed about the trial. Participants are randomly assigned to the study or control intervention. 1:1 randomization is used.
In both groups, data on duration of the intervention, count of needle passes, correctness of injection location and radiation exposure will be collected. The outcome measures will be compared between the groups.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Nadja Farshad, MD
- Phone Number: +41443863320
- Email: nadja.farshad@balgrist.ch
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Reto Sutter, MD
- Phone Number: +41443863301
- Email: reto.sutter@balgrist.ch
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zurich, Switzerland, 8008
- University Hospital Zurich
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- - Patients 18 to 99 years of age
- Patients assigned for fluoroscopic guided injections (including MR arthrographies)
- Patients assigned for US guided injections (including MR arthrographies)
Exclusion Criteria:
- - Patients who are not willing to be part of the study
- Contraindication against fluoroscopic guided injection
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding (Pregnancy assessment is part of the routine prior to fluoroscopic joint injections. No pregnancy test will be done for this study.)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: AR US
Augmented reality sonography guidance for shoulder punctures
|
Shoulder puncture with the newly designed technique using AR to overlie the US image to the imaged anatomical structures in comparision to standard US and flurosopic-guidance.
|
|
Active Comparator: standard US
standard sonography guidance for shoulder punctures
|
Shoulder puncture with the newly designed technique using AR to overlie the US image to the imaged anatomical structures in comparision to standard US and flurosopic-guidance.
|
|
Active Comparator: Fluoroscopic
Fluroscopic guidance for shoulder punctures
|
Shoulder puncture with the newly designed technique using AR to overlie the US image to the imaged anatomical structures in comparision to standard US and flurosopic-guidance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Augmented reality sonography is less time consuming
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Puncturing shoulders with Augmented reality sonography is faster (measuring the time in minutes and seconds) than when using standard sonography- from point of entry the skin until the target
|
10 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sonography is more efficient than fluoroscopic- guidance in shoulder puncturing
Time Frame: 10 minutes (ml aspirated) to 3 days (laboratory results)
|
More fluid (measured in ml) can be aspirated with lower false negative results (laboratory results) when puncutring shoulders with US-guidance in comparison to fluoroscopic guidance
|
10 minutes (ml aspirated) to 3 days (laboratory results)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- R471
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.