Reducing Silica Exposure Among Brick Kiln Workers in Nepal
Reducing Silica Exposure Among Brick Kiln Workers in Nepal: A Human-centered Design Framework to Develop a Personal Protective Equipment Training Intervention
Inhaling respirable silica increases the risk for silicosis, an incurable and debilitating lung disease. In South Asia, one high-risk industry is brick manufacturing, where more than 4 million manual laborers mold bricks by hand. In Nepal, brick manufacturing employs over 200,000 workers across 1,200 registered brick kilns. These workers are exposed to respirable silica concentrations 1.4 to 6.6 times higher than the limits set by the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Preventing silicosis is paramount, as the average brick kiln worker cannot afford medical care and only 6.8% receive regular health checks. Few studies have evaluated interventions in brick kiln workers to reduce silica exposure and prevent silicosis.
One promising intervention involves providing workers who are exposed to silica above the permissible exposure limit with personal protective equipment (PPE), specifically respirators. When properly used, respirators decrease silica inhalation and the risk of silicosis. Brick kiln workers in Nepal do not use any PPE. Several studies have explored PPE barriers and have evaluated the feasibility of implementing PPE but to date none have been conducted in Nepali brick kiln workers. To close this gap, the goal of this research is a human-centered design approach to develop and pilot a PPE training program in one brick kiln in Nepal guided by the Discover, Design, Build, and Test (DDBT) framework.
This research is necessary to understand the Nepali context and to efficiently develop appropriate and feasible PPE intervention components that will be trialed in future research.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Workers will be recruited from Bhaktapur, a district in the Kathmandu Valley.
The investigators will conduct a four-part study. Part 1 will involve a quantitative, cross-sectional survey to understand baseline worker perceptions on silicosis and personal protective equipment (PPE). Part 2 will comprise qualitative co-creation human-centered design workshops to elicit feedback on PPE training prototypes and types of PPE. Part 3 will be a small feasibility pilot of the training program and most preferred type of PPE. Part 4 will comprise qualitative workshops to elicit feedback on the piloted PPE training program.
The same participants may participate in Part 1 and 2. Participants in Part 3 will be a distinct group from those who participated in Parts 1 and 2.
Assessments will include:
Aim 1: Characterize knowledge gaps and behaviors influencing PPE use among brick kiln workers in Bhaktapur, Nepal Method: Quantitative, cross-sectional survey to understand baseline worker perceptions on silicosis and personal protective equipment (PPE). N = 100 workers.
Aim 2: Design a personal protective equipment (PPE) training program for brick kiln workers in Nepal through a human-centered design approach Method: 4 qualitative co-creation human-centered design workshops. N = 20 - 40 workers.
Aim 3: Evaluate acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of personal protective equipment (PPE) training through a pilot among brick kiln workers in Nepal Method: Feasibility pilot study at 1 brick kiln for 3 weeks. N = 20 workers (intervention) and N = 20 workers (control). 3 qualitative co-creation human-centered design workshops to elicit feedback after the pilot. N = 10 - 20 workers.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: William Checkley, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +1 443-287-4587
- Email: wcheckl1@jhmi.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Erika Miller
- Phone Number: +1 443-287-4235
- Email: emille76@jhmi.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Kathmandu
-
Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal
- Tribhuvan University
-
-
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins University
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
- Duke University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older
- Active Brick Kiln Workers in Bhaktapur, Nepal
- Cognitively capable to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 years old
- Non Brick Kiln Workers
- Not cognitively capable to provide informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Baseline Survey: Silicosis and Personal Protective Equipment
|
A quantitative, cross-sectional survey will be distributed to enrolled participants to understand baseline worker perceptions on silicosis and personal protective equipment (PPE).
|
|
Experimental: Design of Personal Protective Equipment Training Workshop
|
A co-creation human centered design workshop to elicit feedback on PPE training prototypes and types of PPE.
|
|
Experimental: Pilot Study: Personal Protective Equipment Training Program
A small training program will be offered to brick kiln workers to determine preferred PPE type, feasibility in the work environment and proper usage of PPE.
|
The participants in this group will be provided with N95 respirator masks to protect from dust and debris while working in the brick kiln and trained on proper usage.
The participants in this group will be provided with eye wear to protect the eyes from dust and debris while working in the brick kiln and trained on proper usage
|
|
Experimental: Feedback Workshop on Pilot Personal Protective Equipment Training Program
|
Qualitative workshops will be held to elicit feedback on the piloted PPE training program.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility as assessed by The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Feasibility will be measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure which includes 4 questions with 5-point likert response options, Completely disagree (1) - Completely agree (5).
Higher score, higher agreement of feasibility.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: William Checkley, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00387104
- D43TW009340 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.