The Efficacy and Safety of EOB-MRI Guided Microwave Ablation for Early HCC: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Jinan, China
- Shandong PH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Patients with chronic liver disease who are at high/extremely high-risk of hepatocellular carcinoma;
- EOB-MRI suggestive of confirmed or suspected eHCC (single lesion ≤ 2 cm or number of lesions ≤ 3 and maximum diameter ≤ 2 cm)
- No previous history of hepatocellular carcinoma;
- Not receiving any anti-cancer treatment;
- Liver function Child-push A or B.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of lymph nodes or distant metastases;
- Presence of liver metastases;
- Prior malignancy;
- Severe cardiopulmonary or renal dysfunction;
- Suffering from uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction (prothrombin time > 25 seconds, prothrombin activity < 40%, platelet count ≤ 50x10^9/L);
- Severe infectious lesions in the area of the puncture needle tract.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
single-group with MWA
334 patients with confirmed or suspected eHCC as indicated by EOB-MRI were to be included in this study in a population with high or extremely high-risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver disease.
Then Microwave ablation (MWA) was performed under EOB-MRI guidance in patients with confirmed or suspected eHCC.
|
Microwave ablation (MWA) was performed under EOB-MRI guidance in patients with confirmed or suspected eHCC.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
5-years overall survival (OS) after MWA for early HCC
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Analyze the efficacy and safety of EOB-MRI-guided microwave ablation in the treatment of eHCC;
|
5 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of completed ablation after MWA
Time Frame: rate of completed ablation at one month
|
Ablation effect assessed by EOB-MRI one month after ablation
|
rate of completed ablation at one month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, Singal AG, Pikarsky E, Roayaie S, Lencioni R, Koike K, Zucman-Rossi J, Finn RS. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jan 21;7(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00240-3.
- International Consensus Group for Hepatocellular NeoplasiaThe International Consensus Group for Hepatocellular Neoplasia. Pathologic diagnosis of early hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of the international consensus group for hepatocellular neoplasia. Hepatology. 2009 Feb;49(2):658-64. doi: 10.1002/hep.22709. No abstract available. Erratum In: Hepatology. 2009 Mar;49(3):1058.
- Sirlin CB, Kielar AZ, Tang A, Bashir MR. LI-RADS: a glimpse into the future. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jan;43(1):231-236. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1448-1.
- Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, Tateishi R, Han KH, Chawla YK, Shiina S, Jafri W, Payawal DA, Ohki T, Ogasawara S, Chen PJ, Lesmana CRA, Lesmana LA, Gani RA, Obi S, Dokmeci AK, Sarin SK. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017 Jul;11(4):317-370. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
- Choi JY, Lee JM, Sirlin CB. CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development, growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects. Radiology. 2014 Sep;272(3):635-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132361.
- Renzulli M, Biselli M, Brocchi S, Granito A, Vasuri F, Tovoli F, Sessagesimi E, Piscaglia F, D'Errico A, Bolondi L, Golfieri R. New hallmark of hepatocellular carcinoma, early hepatocellular carcinoma and high-grade dysplastic nodules on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI in patients with cirrhosis: a new diagnostic algorithm. Gut. 2018 Sep;67(9):1674-1682. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315384. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
- Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fabrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado A, Kelley RK, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Salem R, Sangro B, Singal AG, Vogel A, Fuster J, Ayuso C, Bruix J. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
- Kudo M, Kawamura Y, Hasegawa K, Tateishi R, Kariyama K, Shiina S, Toyoda H, Imai Y, Hiraoka A, Ikeda M, Izumi N, Moriguchi M, Ogasawara S, Minami Y, Ueshima K, Murakami T, Miyayama S, Nakashima O, Yano H, Sakamoto M, Hatano E, Shimada M, Kokudo N, Mochida S, Takehara T. Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan: JSH Consensus Statements and Recommendations 2021 Update. Liver Cancer. 2021 Jun;10(3):181-223. doi: 10.1159/000514174. Epub 2021 May 19.
- Facciorusso A, Abd El Aziz MA, Tartaglia N, Ramai D, Mohan BP, Cotsoglou C, Pusceddu S, Giacomelli L, Ambrosi A, Sacco R. Microwave Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;12(12):3796. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123796.
- Chen L, Ren Y, Sun T, Cao Y, Yan L, Zhang W, Ouyang T, Zheng C. The efficacy of radiofrequency ablation versus cryoablation in the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma: A population-based study. Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(11):3715-3725. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3923. Epub 2021 May 7.
- Suwa K, Seki T, Aoi K, Yamashina M, Murata M, Yamashiki N, Nishio A, Shimatani M, Naganuma M. Efficacy of microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Aug;46(8):3790-3797. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03008-9. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
- Wang F, Numata K, Nihonmatsu H, Chuma M, Moriya S, Nozaki A, Ogushi K, Fukuda H, Ruan L, Okada M, Luo W, Koizumi N, Nakano M, Otani M, Inayama Y, Maeda S. Intraprocedurally EOB-MRI/US fusion imaging focusing on hepatobiliary phase findings can help to reduce the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):1149-1158. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1825837.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SWYX NO 2023-1035
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.