The Effect of External Pressure Applı̇ed to the Palm on Labor Paı̇n and Childbirth Experı̇ence
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34500
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being aged between 18-35 years
- Being a nulliparous pregnant woman
- Being pregnant at term (between the 37th and 42nd weeks of gestation)
- Expecting the vaginal delivery
- Being in singleton and vertex presentation
- The weight of the fetus between 2500-4000 g
- Having had an uncomplicated pregnancy process for the pregnant woman and the fetus
- Being in the latent phase (cervical dilatation below 4 cm)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having high-risk pregnancy
- Having any disease and disability related to the hand and palm
- Having any health problem preventing communication
- Being a pregnant woman in need of analgesics
- Pregnant women to whom non-pharmacological methods were applied to relieve pain
- Undergoing cesarean section due to possible indication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental Group
Information about applying external pressure to the palm was provided to the pregnant women in the experimental group.
The researcher practically explained how, when and for how long to apply external pressure to the palm.
The researcher introduced the comb to be used in the application of external pressure to the palm, and the application stage of the study was started.
|
During the 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and 9-10 cm cervical dilatation stages of the labor process, palm external pressure was applied to the pregnant women in the experimental group.
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Routine midwifery care and services applied to all pregnant women in the hospital were provided to the participants in the control group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Level of labor pain will be measured with VAS.
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
(min:0, max:10)
|
30 minutes
|
|
The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)
Time Frame: At the 30th minute postpartum
|
At the 30th minute postpartum
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Emine Nur Çalımlı Celep, Researcher Assistant
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
- Chaillet N, Belaid L, Crochetiere C, Roy L, Gagne GP, Moutquin JM, Rossignol M, Dugas M, Wassef M, Bonapace J. Nonpharmacologic approaches for pain management during labor compared with usual care: a meta-analysis. Birth. 2014 Jun;41(2):122-37. doi: 10.1111/birt.12103. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
- Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1153-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x.
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e164-e173. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003074.
- Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1356-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013.
- Abdul-Sattar Khudhur Ali S, Mirkhan Ahmed H. Effect of Change in Position and Back Massage on Pain Perception during First Stage of Labor. Pain Manag Nurs. 2018 Jun;19(3):288-294. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
- WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513809/
- Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.
- Lang AJ, Sorrell JT, Rodgers CS, Lebeck MM. Anxiety sensitivity as a predictor of labor pain. Eur J Pain. 2006 Apr;10(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
- Myles PS. The pain visual analog scale: linear or nonlinear? Anesthesiology. 2004 Mar;100(3):744; author reply 745. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00042. No abstract available.
- Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Jones L. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD009290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub2.
- Soriano-Vidal FJ, Oliver-Roig A, Cabrero-Garcia J, Congost-Maestre N, Dencker A, Richart-Martinez M. The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z.
- Hamidzadeh A, Shahpourian F, Orak RJ, Montazeri AS, Khosravi A. Effects of LI4 acupressure on labor pain in the first stage of labor. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;57(2):133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00138.x. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
- Rosseland LA, Reme SE, Simonsen TB, Thoresen M, Nielsen CS, Gran ME. Are labor pain and birth experience associated with persistent pain and postpartum depression? A prospective cohort study. Scand J Pain. 2020 Jul 28;20(3):591-602. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0025. Erratum In: Scand J Pain. 2020 Oct 25;20(4):865.
- Sehhatie-Shafaie F, Kazemzadeh R, Amani F, Heshmat R. The effect of acupressure on sanyinjiao and hugo points on labor pain in nulliparous women: a randomized clinical trial. J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun 1;2(2):123-9. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2013.015. eCollection 2013 Jun.
- Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Dahlen HG, Ee CC, Suganuma M. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IUC-ENC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.