Comparative Clinical Study for Two Types of Locator Attachments for Mandibular Implant Supported Overdenture
A Comparative Clinical Study for Two Types of Locator Attachments for Mandibular Implant-supported Overdenture; A 3-year Radiographic and Clinical Follow-up Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mansoura, Egypt, P.O.Box:35516
- Mansoura University ,Faculty of dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1. All selected patients have two implants placed in the mandibular interforaminal region.
2. All selected patients have a healthy mucosa and with no clinical complications.
3. All patients are cooperative and approve the proposed treatment protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. Patients who reject to participate in the study. 2.Patients who need implant placement as a result of previous implant failure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group I
patients who would be delivered a mandibular implant overdenture using conventional locator attachments.
|
patients would be delivered mandibular implant overdenture using conventional locator and Locator RTX attachments
|
|
Active Comparator: Group II (study)
patients who would be delivered mandibular implant overdenture using Locator RTX attachments
|
patients would be delivered mandibular implant overdenture using conventional locator and Locator RTX attachments
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
crestal cone loss
Time Frame: three years
|
Intraoral radiographs were performed using the long cone paralleling technique to evaluate crestal bone loss
|
three years
|
|
prosthetic complications
Time Frame: three years
|
prosthetic complications were scored clinically
|
three years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- A0208023RP
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.