Deprescribing dRrugs for Overactive Bladder in General Practice (DROP) (DROP)

November 25, 2025 updated by: Anne Estrup Olesen

Deprescribing dRugs for Overactive Bladder in the Elderly in General Practice - a Randomized Controlled Trial With a Nested Mixed Methods Study

The objective is to understand and evaluate the effectiveness of a deprescribing intervention in primary care, specifically targeting medications for overactive bladder in individuals aged 65 or older.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Potentially inappropriate medication is prescribed medications with an unfavorable risk-benefit profile, for which there might be better, safer, or more cost-effective alternatives. Anticholinergic drugs for Overactive Bladder (OAB) is an example of a potentially inappropriate medication in the elderly, calling for attention and possible deprescribing. Due to their crucial role in maintaining a patient's medication regimen, primary care settings are widely regarded as the optimal location for conducting medication reviews and deprescribing interventions.

This study utilizes a mixed methods explanatory sequential design, nested in a randomised controlled trial to explore deprescribing drugs for Overactive Bladder (OAB). General practices will be randomized into two groups. The intervention group will then be evaluated in a mixed methods setup and finish the study with a comparison to the control group. The mixed methods approach employs a quantitative approach following the intervention group and investigates the prevalence of deprescribing the drugs in question. Secondly, a qualitative approach will be used to delve into the experiences of general practitioners (GPs), support staff, and patients during the deprescribing process. Finally, the quantitative and qualitative findings are merged to gain a comprehensive understanding of deprescribing for OAB. This integrated approach enhances insights and informs future interventions and recommendations. After the mixed methods studies are completed the control group will be used in an overall comparison of the two groups using registry data

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Anne E Olesen, Professor
  • Phone Number: 0045 2628 1305
  • Email: aneso@rn.dk

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Denmark
    • Aalborg
      • Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Aalborg University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient must have been prescribed one of the following drugs for OAB within the last 14 months
  • patient must be able to speak and understand Danish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • too cognitively impaired to participate or otherwise unfit to participate as estimated by general practitioner
  • receiving neurological or urogenital ambulatory care for their overactive bladder symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention group

The primary care clinics in the intervention group will contact and evaluate all patients receiving one or more of the following drugs:

G04BD04 Oxybutynin G04BD07 Tolterodine G04BD08 Solifenacin G04BD09 Trospium G04BD10 Darifenacine G04BD11 Fesoterodine G04BD12 Mirabegron The patients will be asked to discontinue the treatment and eventually be deprescribed
Other: deprescribing-intervention
The clinical guideline on "Deprescribing drugs for OAB" in The North Denmark Region serves as the basis for the intervention. The guideline provides recommended procedures for the deprescribing process. The guideline offers procedures for the deprescribing process and includes a deprescribing algorithm and a symptom questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of medications utilized in the treatment of OAB.
Other Names:
  • DROB (Deprescribing dRugs for Overactive Bladder)
No Intervention: Control group
The primary care clinics in the control group will not contact and evaluate patients and are not informed about the study. Data will be extracted from registries

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in proportion of patients receiving drugs for overactive bladder
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary outcome will be the difference in the proportion of patients receiving drugs for overactive bladder before and after a 6-month follow-up period.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
proportion of patients in the intervention group who had deprescribing initiated but not sustained
Time Frame: 6 months
Descriptive characteristics of the proportion of patients in the intervention group who had deprescribing initiated but not sustained.
6 months
The proportion of patients where deprescribing was not initiated
Time Frame: 6 months
Descriptive characteristics of the proportion of patients in the intervention group where deprescribing was not initiated.
6 months
Changes and distribution of bladder symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months
Descriptive characteristics and distribution of bladder symptoms between and within the groups before and after the intervention
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A qualitative score measuring experiences
Time Frame: Approximately 6 months after the study initiates
Interviews to explore how GPs, staff members, and patients have experienced the intervention and which strategies have been used for the successful deprescribing of drugs for overactive bladder to understand when and how the algorithm is useful using thematic analysis
Approximately 6 months after the study initiates

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Anne Estrup Olesen

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University College of Northern Denmark

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anne E Olesen, Professor, Aalborg University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • K2023-012

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on deprescribing-intervention

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings