Modifying Working Memory With Brain Stimulation (BROCA-NIBS)

November 6, 2023 updated by: Maastricht University

Brain Outcome After Cardiac Arrest. Modifying Working Memory With Non-invasive Brain Stimulation - A Series of SCEDs

The investigators want to investigate the effect of rTMS on working memory measured by the N-back task. This is a single case experimental design, ABAB.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Rationale: The survival rate of patients after cardiac arrest and resuscitation has increased considerably. A common consequence of cardiac arrest is ischemic-hypoxic brain damage leading to cognitive impairment. Currently, there is a lack of knowledge regarding effectiveness of treatments to improve outcomes of patients with cognitive impairment after a cardiac arrest.

Objective: The primary objective is to investigate the effects of rTMS (iTBS protocol) on working memory of people with memory impairments after a cardiac arrest in the past Study design: This will be a single blinded replicated randomized SCED withdrawal designs study.

Study population: Nine adults who had a cardiac arrest in the past will be participating in this study. They are recruited in the general population.

Intervention: If participants are suitable based on the screening. Participants are invited to the university of Maastricht. There they receive intermitted theta burst stimulation with a TMS coil for 3 minutes on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Then they perform the N-back task for 8 to 12 minutes to estimate working-memory performance. Then they have a break (45 min). Then they receive 3 minutes of sham stimulation after which they have to perform the N-back task again for 8 - 12 minutes. This will be repeated (active stimulation - sham - active stimulation - sham).

Main study parameter: The main study outcomes are performance on the N-back task with regard to accuracy.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The participant has to come to the university twice. The screening session takes approximately 1-1,5 hour, the experimental session 3,5 hours. The participant could experience side effects of the rTMS, these include: headache, scalp discomfort, tingling or twitching of the facial muscles, and light-headedness. Serious side effects are very rare, but they may include: seizures. The N-back task can be experienced as tiring.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
9

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Had a cardiac arrest between 3 months and 5 years prior to the experiment session.
  • Scores lower than the general population (corrected for age, education, and sex) on at least one of the cognitive tests ( SD < -1 on the Stroop, digit span, or TMT).
  • Age 18 up to and including 75.
  • Proficient in Dutch or English to understand the instructions for the N-back task.
  • Has sufficient understanding to perform the N-back task.
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a pacemaker or ICD (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator)
  • A history or a family member with a history of seizures / epilepsy (asked on the phone and checked on the first appointment).
  • Metal implants in or near the head.
  • Pregnancy
  • Any other neurological disorder impending working memory performance besides the OHCA.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: ABAB
all participants will go through sham (control) and active (experimental) stimulation. So either sham - active - sham - active or active - sham - active - sham
Device: intermitted theta burst stimulation
Participants receive intermitted theta burst stimulation for 3-4 minutes before completing the N-back task.
Other Names:
  • rTMS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy on the N-back task
Time Frame: 1 measurements every 2 minutes for 8 - 10 minutes after each N-back task (4 times in total)
Percentage of correct responses for every 2 N-back blocks
1 measurements every 2 minutes for 8 - 10 minutes after each N-back task (4 times in total)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RT on the N-back task
Time Frame: 1 measurements every 2 minutes for 8 - 10 minutes after each N-back task (4 times in total)
reaction time on the N-back task
1 measurements every 2 minutes for 8 - 10 minutes after each N-back task (4 times in total)
d' on the N-back task
Time Frame: 1 measurements every 2 minutes for 8 - 10 minutes after each N-back task (4 times in total)
d' = z(False alarms) - z(Hits)
1 measurements every 2 minutes for 8 - 10 minutes after each N-back task (4 times in total)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Maastricht University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Caronline v van Heugten, Dr. prof., Maastricht University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BROCA-NIBS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on intermitted theta burst stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings