A Comparison of Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance and FloTrac/Vigileo
A Comparison of Stroke Volume Variation for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Measured by Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance and FloTrac/Vigileo
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Diansan Su, Dr.
- Phone Number: +862168383702
- Email: diansansu@yahoo.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Yuwen Cheng
- Phone Number: +862168383702
- Email: 15373748@qq.com
Study Locations
-
-
Shanghai
-
Pudong, Shanghai, China, 200127
- Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18≤ Age ≤65.
- patients undergoinglaparoscopic elective surgery for gastrointestinal tumors under general anesthesia
- 18 kg/m2≤BMI≤30 kg/m2
- ASA classification I-III
- Patients signed informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Arrhythmias
- The patient is diagnosed with severe cardiovascular disease(pulmonary arterial hypertension、left ventricular ejection fraction< 50%、aortic aneurysm、extensive peripheral arterial occlusive disease,、significant valvulopathy)
- Severe heart failure (METS<4)
- The patient is diagnosed with severe hepatic dysfunction (ChildePugh class C)
- The patient is diagnosed with severe renal dysfunction (undergoing dialysis before surgery)
- There is an infectious lesion on the skin or subcutaneous tissue where the non-invasive electrode piece is placed
- History of allergy to anesthetic drugs
- Weight<40kg
- Allergies to 6% hydroxyethyl starch, Fresenius Kabi, Deutschland
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Flotrac Group
In this group,an arterial catheter was inserted preoperatively.
An indwelling radial artery catheter was connected to the hemodynamic monitoring system (EV1000; Edward Lifesciences Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) via FloTrac™ (Edwards Lifesciences Corp.) sensors.
|
Haemodynamic parameters were collected simultaneously by the Flotrac monitoring.
|
|
Experimental: BioZ Group
In this group,haemodynamic parameters were collected simultaneously by the thoracic bioimpedance (BioZ.com™)
monitoring.
|
Haemodynamic parameters were collected simultaneously by the thoracic bioimpedance (BioZ.com™)monitoring.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The agreement between simultaneously measured SVV-FloTrac and SVV-BioZ
Time Frame: From anesthesia induction to the nonresponsive VLS about one hour.
|
After anesthesia induction, volume loading was initiated.
For each volume loading step (VLS), 100 mL of colloid solution (6% hydroxyethyl starch) was administered over a 2-minute duration.
The SVV was measured and recorded simultaneously by FloTrac (SVV-FloTrac) and Transthoracic electrical bioimpedance(SVV-BioZ).
Volume loading steps (VLS) continued until no responsive VLS was observed.
Responsive VLS, defined as an increase in Flotrac-SV by at least 5%, and nonresponsive VLS, characterized by no change or an increase in Flotrac-SV by less than 5%, were subsequently identified.
Multiple analysis methods were used to determine the agreement of the two SVVs.
|
From anesthesia induction to the nonresponsive VLS about one hour.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The capacity to predict fluid responsiveness.
Time Frame: From anesthesia induction to the nonresponsive VLS about one hour.
|
After anesthesia induction, volume loading was initiated.
For each volume loading step (VLS), 100 mL of colloid solution (6% hydroxyethyl starch) was administered over a 2-minute duration.
The SVV was measured and recorded simultaneously by FloTrac (SVV-FloTrac) and Transthoracic electrical bioimpedance(SVV-BioZ).
Volume loading steps (VLS) continued until no responsive VLS was observed.
Responsive VLS, defined as an increase in Flotrac-SV by at least 5%, and nonresponsive VLS, characterized by no change or an increase in Flotrac-SV by less than 5%, were subsequently identified.
Multiple analysis methods were used to determine the capacity to predict the fluid responsiveness of these two devices.
|
From anesthesia induction to the nonresponsive VLS about one hour.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- LY2023-168-B
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.