D-SOLVE Cohorts (Cohort a and B) (HDV750)

March 11, 2025 updated by: Hannover Medical School

Hepatitis D is by far the most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis, frequently leading to liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma and death. Hepatitis D is caused by coinfection Hepatitis D is caused by co-infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV).

This multicenter cohort should enable a comprehensive and unbiased biomarker screening of well-defined HDV-infected patients, followed by mechanistic studies to determine the functional role of distinct molecules. Patient surveillance strategies and antiviral treatment approaches could be personalized which should reduce clinical and social disease burden, improve quality of life and save direct and indirect costs caused by HDV infection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The D-SOLVE consortium ("Understanding the individual host response against Hepatitis D Virus to develop a personalized approach for the management of hepatitis D"), aims for an unbiased screening of a large multicenter cohort of well-defined HDV-infected patients to better understand individual factors determining the outcome of infection and to identify subjects benefitting from currently available treatments.

The D-SOLVE cohorts will be collected retrospectively as well as prospectively with clinical and virological data and biomaterial for the biomarker analysis. The aim of the cohorts is as following:

Cohort A: To define the demographic, clinical, virological, and immunological features of a large cross-sectional cohort of 750 untreated and treated HDV patients at 4 EU centers. To compare these features among patients with different origin, gender, disease severity and treatment. To collect biological material to generate translational studies, aimed to better understand pathogenesis, natural history and treatment response.

Cohort B: To identify histological and immunological features that are associated with fibrosis progression and clinical complications in patients with chronic HDV infection.

The D-SOLVE consortium has received funding from the Horizon 2020 EU Horizon Call "Personalised medicine and infectious diseases: understanding the individual host response to viruses (e.g. SARS-CoV-2)" of the European Union (grant agreement No 101057917). The consortium is coordinated by Hannover Medical School (MHH) and the Centre for Individualised Infection Medicine (CiiM). Other partners are:

  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (HZI), Germany
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM)
  • Karolinska Institutet (KI), Sweden
  • Karolinska University Hospital / Region Stockholm (KUH), Sweden
  • Policlinico of Milan (PFM), Italy
  • National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Prof Dr Matei Balș" (INBIMB), Romania
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Informationssicherheit (CISPA), Germany

The Cohorts and the biomarker screening are part of the EU-funded D-SOLVE Consortium.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
750

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Recruiting
        • Hannover Medical School, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Disease and Endocrinology
        • Contact:
          • Heiner Wedemeyer
  • Italy
      • Milan, Italy
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (University of Milan)
        • Contact:
          • Pietro Lampertico
  • Romania
      • Bucharest, Romania, 021105
        • Recruiting
        • Institutul de Boli Infectioase "Prof. Dr. Matei Bals"
        • Contact:
          • Florin Alexandru Caruntu, Dr.
  • Sweden
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet
        • Contact:
          • Soo Aleman

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All adult patients chronically infected with the hepatitis D virus (anti-HDV positive) can be included. For cohort B historical liver biopsies need to be available.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Anti-HDV positive
  • ≥18 years old
  • Sex: m/f/d
  • Informed consent for prospective procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anti-HDV negative

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Cohort A
Cohort A: Patients chronically infected with HDV. Patients with and without cirrhosis and with and without viremia will be included.
Cohort B
Cohort B: Patients chronically infected with HDV and with available historical liver biopsies (5-20 years old biopsies) and clinical follow-up data or current patients willing to receive a core biopsy or fine-needle liver-cell aspirate (FNA). Patients with and without cirrhosis and with and without viremia will be included.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biosample Screening
Time Frame: 3 years
Identification of biomarkers that are associated with disease control, progression and treatment response by a multiomics approach that includes the investigation of: - the genome by the Illumina Infinium Global Screening array - the transcriptome by RNA-sequencing and single-cell RNA-sequencing (subset of samples) - the proteome by the Olink technology (high throughput proximity extension assay) - the metabolome by HPLC 1H-NMR (~2k metabolite features) - the methylome (Illumina 850k array) - immune phenotypes by high dimensional spectral flow cytometry - Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex imaging of HDV-patient liver biopsies
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Definition of the demographic, clinical and virological features of the cohort.
Time Frame: 3 years
Identification of immunological determinants of liver disease progression, viral control and treatment response by - scRNA/ATAC sequencing of Ag-specific T cells, NK cells and MAIT cells (PBMC) - spatial multiomics with feature barcoding technology of liver core biopsies - Validation of findings by 29-color flow cytometry, hepatoma HDV infection system and respective mouse models
3 years
Identification of virological and immunological features and characteristics that relate to disease severity and treatment response.
Time Frame: 3 years
Establishment of a computational model to predict immune responses and disease phenotype
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hannover Medical School

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Karolinska University Hospital
Karolinska Institutet
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
National Institute of Infectious Diseases Matei Bals

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Markus Cornberg, Hannover Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HDV750

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Liver Disease

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings