Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Suvorexant 20 mg to Placebo for Treatment of Insomnia in Cancer Survivors

July 21, 2026 updated by: Sarah Tucker Marrison, Medical University of South Carolina
Investigators propose a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the use of the use of Suvorexant in breast cancer survivors on selective estrogen receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitors with sleep disturbance to assess the impact on insomnia symptoms and quality of life. Breast cancer survivors have an increased risk of insomnia for which Suvorexant has the has the potential ability to impact to improve sleep related outcomes and cancer survivorship outcomes. Breast cancer survivors with sleep disturbance based on an Insomnia Severity Index Score (ISI) >15 will be randomized to either Suvorexant or placebo, with both arms receiving education on sleep hygiene.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cancer survivors have an incidence of sleep disturbance and insomnia higher than the general population, with significant potential implications on health outcomes including in survivorship domains and mortality outcomes. Available pharmacologic options for management of sleep disturbance are limited in efficacy and in their side effects. Investigators propose a double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating the use of the use of Suvorexant in breast cancer survivors on selective estrogen receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitors with sleep disturbance to assess the impact on insomnia symptoms and quality of life. Evaluation of breast cancer survivors on endocrine therapy uses a study population with high 5-year survival rate while retaining the capacity for recruitment and creating an opportunity to explore potential effects on vasomotor symptoms. Suvorexant has the potential to have a significant impact in cancer survivors not only on sleep related outcomes but also on cancer survivorship outcomes.

The purpose of the research study is to evaluate the ability of Suvorexant, a medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for insomnia, to treat sleep disturbance in breast cancer survivors on endocrine therapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • MUSC Department of Family Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult post menopausal breast cancer survivors (female, > 18 years old)
  • current selective estrogen modulator or aromatase inhibitor use
  • at least 6 weeks beyond completion of definitive treatment for breast cancer
  • less than 5 years from time of diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • less than 6-month life expectancy
  • current steroid use
  • severe depression or anxiety
  • severe hepatic impairment
  • concurrent use of moderate or strong CYP3A inhibitors
  • current receipt of hospice care
  • severe mental illness
  • current use of greater than 40 morphine milligram equivalents daily
  • diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, narcolepsy or other sleep related illness other than insomnia
  • pregnancy
  • treatment with alternate pharmacotherapy for insomnia at the time of trial initiation
  • menstrual cycle within the past year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Suvorexant with information on sleep hygiene
Participants randomized to this arm will receive 10 mg of suvorexant daily with a dose increase to 20 mg after day 7. Medication will be administered as an oral medication. Total duration of 28 days.
Drug: Suvorexant Tablets
Suvorexant initially with 10-20 mg for 28 days
Placebo Comparator: Placebo with information on sleep hygiene
Participants randomized to this arm will receive placebo control daily with a switch to an alternate placebo control vial after 7 days, consistent with intervention arms. Medication will be administered as an oral medication. Total duration of 28 days.
Other: Placebo Control
Matched Placebo Control for 28 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant Reported Insomnia Symptoms Evaluated Using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The ISI is scored on a scale of 0-28 based on responses to 7 questions, with higher values indicating more severe symptoms of sleep disturbance. Five participants completed the study.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vasomotor Symptoms Assessed Using the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Vasomotor symptoms were assessed using the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale. This validated instrument measures the extent to which hot flashes interfere with daily activities and quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater interference due to vasomotor symptoms. Five participants completed the study. Due to early study termination for insufficient accrual, the planned statistical analyses were not performed.
4 weeks
Quality of Life Evaluated Using the SF-36
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). We have reported the average domain score for the general health domain. Each domain score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Five participants completed the study. Due to early study termination for insufficient accrual, the planned statistical analyses were not performed.
4 Weeks
Quality of Life Evaluated Using the Cancer Problems in Living Scale (CPIL)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Problems related to living with cancer were assessed using the Cancer Problems of Living (CPIL) Scale. The CPIL consists of a multi-item list of cancer-related problems across practical, emotional, and social domains. Participants rate each problem based on perceived severity, with higher ratings indicating greater problem severity. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-2 with the composite score reported. Score range from 0 to 58. Five participants completed the study. Due to early study termination for insufficient accrual, the planned statistical analyses were not performed.
4 weeks
Pain Evaluation Evaluated Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI asks participants to rate current pain, average pain, least pain, and worst pain on numeric rating scales ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. A total pain severity score can be calculated by averaging these items. Score range is from 0 to 10. Five participants completed the study. Due to early study termination for insufficient accrual, the planned statistical analyses were not performed.
4 weeks
Number of Participants Reported as Adherent Using the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Medication adherence was assessed using the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ). The SMAQ is a brief, participant-reported questionnaire composed of six multiple-choice questions evaluating medication-taking behavior. Non-adherence is indicated by any positive response suggesting missed doses or by reporting more than two missed doses during the preceding week. The outcome reported was the number of participants who were adherent based on this evaluation. Five participants completed the study. Due to early study termination for insufficient accrual, the planned statistical analyses were not performed.
4 weeks
Vasomotor Symptoms Assessed Using the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Vasomotor symptoms were assessed using the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale. This validated instrument measures the extent to which hot flashes interfere with daily activities and quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater interference due to vasomotor symptoms. Five participants completed the study. Due to early study termination for insufficient accrual, the planned statistical analyses were not performed.
2 weeks
Participant Reported Insomnia Symptoms Evaluated Using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score was evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. The ISI is scored on a scale of 0-28 based on responses to 7 questions, with higher values indicating more severe symptoms of sleep disturbance. Five participants completed the study. Due to early study termination for insufficient accrual, the planned statistical analyses were not performed.
2 weeks
Pain Evaluation Evaluated Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI asks participants to rate current pain, average pain, least pain, and worst pain on numeric rating scales ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. A total pain severity score can be calculated by averaging these items. Score range is from 0 to 10. Five participants completed the study. Due to early study termination for insufficient accrual, the planned statistical analyses were not performed.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of South Carolina

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Marrison, MD PhD, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 17, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 21, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00130637

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings