Clinic or Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening

December 19, 2023 updated by: OZGE SEN, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)

The Effect of in Clinic or Self- Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening on Status of Particitipation, Attitude and Anxiety.

Objective: The aim of this project was to determine the effect of clinic or self-sampling on attendance, attitudes, and anxiety in cervical cancer screening.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Introduction: Persistent infection with high-risk HPV strains is the main cause of cervical cancer.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of clinic or self-sampling on cervical cancer screening participation, attitudes and anxiety in women.

Method: The study was conducted as a descriptive and randomized controlled study between October 2022 and December 2023 in Ödemiş ASM No. 2, Ministry of Health, Republic of Turkey. The first phase of the study was conducted with 309 women and the "Introductory Information Form" and "Attitude Scale for Early Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer" were used to evaluate participation and attitudes towards cervical cancer screening. The second phase of the study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial with 110 women in the experimental (n=55) and control (n=55) groups. The women in the experimental group were trained before the procedure and were allowed to take samples from the vaginal area on their own. The women in the control group were sampled from the cervical region by the clinician. Both groups were pretested before the procedure using the "Descriptive Information Form" and the "State Anxiety Inventory" to measure anxiety. After the sampling procedure, the post-test was administered to the experimental and control groups using the "State Anxiety Inventory".

Results: According to the screening method preferences of the women, 34% (n=105) preferred a self-test, 18.4% (n=57) preferred a test performed by a clinician in a clinic, 3.9% (n=12) preferred no method, and 43.7% (n=135) preferred both methods. In the study, it was found that the self-test option increased participation in screening. The mean total score of the women was found to be 102.896±5.660. This result shows that women have high positive attitudes towards early diagnosis of cervical cancer. In the second stage of the study, it was observed that the descriptive characteristics of the experimental and control groups showed homogeneous distribution. While there was no significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of anxiety level in the pretest, it was found that the control group had a significantly higher anxiety level in the posttest.

Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that women had positive attitudes towards cervical cancer screening, self-sampling increased participation in screening and decreased anxiety levels.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34000
        • Istanbul Unıversıty-Cerrahpasa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Must be able to perform self-test

Exclusion Criteria: pregnancy, diagnosing the cervix

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: randomıze
Assuming that a t-test between two independent groups with 80% power, d=0.5 effect size, and t-test between two independent groups will be used in the study, it was found that there should be at least 102 women in total, including 51 self-sampling and 51 clinician sampling groups. Considering the losses that may occur during the study, it was planned to include 110 women in the sample for this phase. These women will be randomly assigned to Self-Sampling (n=55) or Clinician Sampling (n=55) groups in a 1:1 ratio using https://randomizer.org/. The self-sampling group will be trained on the subject and will be provided with a self-sampling HPV DNA test kit, while the HPV DNA test
Diagnostic test: cervical cancer screening
The aim of this project was to determine the effect of clinic or self-sampling on attendance, attitudes, and anxiety in cervical cancer screening.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Effect of in Clinic or Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening on Status of Participation
Time Frame: 1 year
In the study, it was found that the self-test option increased participation in screening.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Effect of in Clinic or Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening on Status of ling for Cervical Cancer Screening on Status of Attitude
Time Frame: 1 year
This result shows that women have high positive attitudes towards early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Effect of in Clinic or Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening on Status of ling for Cervical Cancer Screening on Status of Anxiety
Time Frame: 1 year
While there was no significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of anxiety level in the pretest, it was found that the control group had a significantly higher anxiety level in the posttest.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Health Institutes of Turkey

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Özge Şen, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • stanbulUC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings