Personalized Perioperative Care Based on Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (SUPPORT)

May 5, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Personalized Perioperative Care Based on Patient Reported Outcomes Measures: Randomized Controlled Trial Based on the QoR-15

In the perioperative setting, Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) are important for both patients and clinicians.

Reliable PROMs, like the Quality Of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) questionnaire, are available for patients experiencing surgery. These PROMs are significantly used as endoints for clinical interventions assessment. These PROMs may also be considered to monitor and assess patient health status as part of enhanced recovery after surgery pathway.

However data about the efficacy of PROMs-based perioperative clinical follow up are lacking.

The clinical hypothesis is that a PROMs (QoR-15) based perioperative clinical care is more efficient that the usual care non based on the QoR-15.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing 2 groups:

  • A control group, including the usual conventional follow-up by the surgeon and the attending physician.
  • An experimental group including, in addition to the usual conventional follow-up, the follow-up by nurses specialized in the evaluation of the PROMs using the french version of the QoR-15 questionnaire.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
280

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Strasbourg, France
        • EBER Manon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patient
  • Benefiting from an osteo-articular surgery
  • Subject affiliated to a social health insurance plan
  • Able to understand the objectives and risks of the research and to give a dated and signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to administer the QoR-15f questionnaire (cognitive impairment, language barrier)
  • Subject under court protection
  • Subject under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient whose rehabilitation will be performed in a secondary hospital
  • Patient having already benefited from a previous follow-up by the OPTIMISTE team
  • Patient included in a therapeutic trial that may impact postoperative quality of recovery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental group: OPTIMISTIC follow-up
follow-up by nurses specialized in collecting the patient's point of view concerning his or her state of health, in addition to the usual conventional follow-up according to routine care directive interviews carried out preoperatively and at Days 1, 3, 14 and 28 postoperatively (modified QoR-15f score, PROMS...)
Behavioral: Experimental group: OPTIMISTIC follow-up
follow-up by nurses specialized in collecting the patient's point of view concerning his or her state of health, in addition to the usual conventional follow-up according to routine care directive interviews carried out preoperatively and at Days 1, 3, 14 and 28 postoperatively (modified QoR-15f score, PROMS...)
Active Comparator: Control group: Usual conventional follow-up
usual conventional follow-up according to routine care (modified QoR-15f score will be administered to all patients at visit 0 and Day 35).
Other: Control group: Usual conventional follow-up
usual conventional follow-up according to routine care (modified QoR-15f score will be administered to all patients at visit 0 and Day 35).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the effectiveness of a perioperative follow-up integrating the patient's point of view in osteoarticular surgery compared to a classic postoperative management
Time Frame: Inclusion (Day 0), Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35
Evolution of a modified version of the French Quality-Of-Recovery 15 score (QoR-15f) between the intraoperative consultation and D35 postoperative
Inclusion (Day 0), Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Describe postoperative functional recovery after osteoarticular surgery
Time Frame: Inclusion (Day 0), Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35
Isolated and dimensional changes in the 15 items of the QoR-15f score from intraoperative consultation to postoperative D35.
Inclusion (Day 0), Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35
Describe the consequences of a perioperative follow-up that integrates the patient's point of view on the patient pathway
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35
Number of medical and paramedical consultations and number of hospitalization days between hospital discharge and D35 postoperative
Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35
Evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative monitoring that incorporates the patient's perspective on reducing postoperative opioid use
Time Frame: Day 35
Opioid consommation at D35 postoperative
Day 35
Evaluate the safety
Time Frame: Inclusion (Day 0), Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35]
postoperative complication rate to postoperative D35
Inclusion (Day 0), Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: EBER Manon, Mme, CHRU Strasbourg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 14, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 23, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 8801 (Other Identifier: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings