Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative (Zirconomer)
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative Material Versus a Glass Ionomer Cement in Restoration of Primary Molars A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Tamador A hmedIbrahim ali, Master
- Phone Number: 347-933-7140
- Email: tamadurah699@gamil.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mujahed a hmed Ibrahim Ali, MASTER
- Phone Number: 749-404-6041
- Email: Mugahed.ali95@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Cairo Governorate
-
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt, 0000
- Cairo University dental hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Children having carious primary molars(class1) without pulp exposure and normal radiograph.
- Children between age 5 and 7 years.
- Both male and female are included.
Cooperative Children.
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with systemic diseases.
- Parent refuse to participate.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Zirconomer Restorative material in primary molar
Arm one zirconomer restorative material (intervention)
|
Restorative material
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Glass Ionomer Cement in primary molar
Arm two Glass Ionomer cement (control)
|
Restorative material
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recurrent CariesColor match
Time Frame: 12 MONTHS
|
Radiographic Visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
|
12 MONTHS
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Color match
Time Frame: 12 MONTHS
|
visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
|
12 MONTHS
|
|
Marginal Discoloration
Time Frame: 12 MONTHS
|
using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
|
12 MONTHS
|
|
Marginal Adaptation
Time Frame: 12 MONTHS
|
using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
|
12 MONTHS
|
|
-Anatomic Form
Time Frame: 12 MONTHS
|
using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
|
12 MONTHS
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: sherien ez zaldein, professor, Cairo University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Albeshti R, Shahid S. Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer(R): A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018 Jun;52(2):97-104. doi: 10.15644/asc52/2/2.
- Arora D, Jain M, Suma Sogi HP, Shahi P, Gupta I, Sandhu M. In vivo evaluation of clinical performance of Cention N and glass ionomer cement in proximal restorations of primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022 Jan-Mar;40(1):23-29. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_108_21.
- Mushtaq U, Mushtaq F, Thakur D, Rathee K, Poonia N, Khullar S. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity Following Restoration of Class I Lesions with Different Restorative Materials: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):650-654.
- undefined
- Nanavati K, Katge F, Chimata VK, Pradhan D, Kamble A, Patil D. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study. J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Dec;22(4):260-266. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87115.1230.
- Kukreja R, Singla S, Bhadoria N, Pawar P, Gupta K, Khandelwal D, Dewani N. An In Vitro Study to Compare the Release of Fluoride from Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX) and Zirconomer. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):35-37. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2141.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Evaluation of zirconomer
- cairo university (Other Grant/Funding Number: faculty of pedatric dentistry)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.