Hallux Valgus Correction Using the Metal Screw or the Human Allogeneic Cortical Bone Screw (Shark Screw).

March 29, 2026 updated by: Forian Wenzel-Schwarz, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising

Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Hallux Valgus Correction Using the Metal Screw or the Human Allogeneic Cortical Bone Screw, a Prospective Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the treatment of Hallux Valgus using the conventional method (metal screw) with the new method (human allogeneic cortical bone screw (Shark Screw®) in adult patients with confirmed Hallux Valgus.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Can the new method obtain comparable results as the conventional method in regard to union rate and time to union? Are the number of complications lower with the new method? Participants will be operated either with the metal screw or with the Shark Screw®. The assignment to the groups is randomized.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The planned prospective study will investigate whether the use of the human allogenic cortical bone screw (Shark Screw® leads to comparable results in the union rate and the prevention of recurrences as with metal screws. Furthermore, it will be investigated whether rotational stability is possible with the bone screw. The measurement of the HVA angle and the IMA angle should provide information on whether the correction is stable over time. A comparison of the AOFAS forefoot score before and after the operation for both methods is a further measure to check whether the human allogenic cortical bone screw can deliver similar results.

Initial studies on the use of the allogenic bone screw in hand and foot surgery show particularly good integration behavior of the human allogenic cortical bone screw . A retrospective study by Hanslik-Schnabel et al has shown initial positive results in the treatment of hallux rigidus. In addition, a gait analysis is performed pre- and postoperatively to provide information on possible differences between the two groups in the context of 3D gait analysis/pedobarography and is also matched with another healthy cohort.

At the preoperative time point and after 12 and 24 months, a 3D gait analysis with a foot model is conducted to record the joint kinematics and kinetics. In the study by Canseco et al. , the proximal gait pattern changes remained unchanged. Hwang reported hyper-external rotation in the subtalar joint, excessive eversion in the subtalar joint, and lack of movement in the hallux MP joint in the terminal standing phase.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Austria
      • Vienna, Austria, 1130
        • Abteilung für Kinderorthopädie und Fußchirurgie Orthopädisches Spital Speising
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Florian Wenzel-Schwarz, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • between 18 and 85
  • confirmed Hallux Valgus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 years and >85 years
  • Known underlying oncological disease
  • Pregnant women or breastfeeding mothers
  • Alcohol and drug abuse
  • Foreseeable compliance problems
  • Foreseeable loss of responsibility as a study doctor
  • Neoplastic diseases
  • Active osteomyelitis
  • Ulcerations in the area of the skin of the surgical site
  • Immunosuppressive medication that cannot be discontinued

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: conventional group
standard surgery with metal screw
Procedure: Hallux Valgus Treatment with metal screw
This is a prospective, randomised study in which hallux valgus is corrected by means of a chevron/kin surgery technique using metal screws or human allogenic cortical bone screws (Shark Screw®, Surgebright, Lichtenberg, Austria). X-rays are taken before the operation at 6 weeks, three, six and twelve months after the operation. The X-ray images provide information on whether bony degeneration has taken place. In addition, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux score, FFI score, hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) are determined. These data are collected preoperatively and 4 weeks (HVA and IMA), six and twelve months postoperatively in order to rule out a change in the HVA and IMA and to document the changes in the AOFAS/FFI.
Experimental: Shark Screw® group
new surgical procedure with human allogeneic cortical bone screw
Procedure: Hallux Valgus Treatment with Shark Screw®
This is a prospective, randomised study in which hallux valgus is corrected by means of a chevron/kin surgery technique using metal screws or human allogenic cortical bone screws (Shark Screw®, Surgebright, Lichtenberg, Austria). X-rays are taken before the operation at 6 weeks, three, six and twelve months after the operation. The X-ray images provide information on whether bony degeneration has taken place. In addition, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux score, FFI score, hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) are determined. These data are collected preoperatively and 4 weeks (HVA and IMA), six and twelve months postoperatively in order to rule out a change in the HVA and IMA and to document the changes in the AOFAS/FFI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical result of Hallux Valgus treatment
Time Frame: 2 years
The primary objective of the study is the longitudinal evaluation of clinical outcomes (pain, appearance) over 2 years after hallux correction using a human, allogenic, bone screw or metal screw.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
radiological (bony union)result of Hallux Valgus treatment
Time Frame: 1 years
The secondary aim of the study is the longitudinal evaluation of the radiological results over one year after hallux correction using a human, allogenic, bone screw or metal screw compared to pre-surgery values.
1 years
Hallux-Valgus angle (HVA) change
Time Frame: 2 years
Comparison of HVA pre-surgery and after 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, between groups and in comparison to pre-surgery data
2 years
gait analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of patients with normal gait in the two groups and in comparison to a healthy cohort
2 years
Intermetatarsal angle (IMA) change
Time Frame: 2 years
Comparison of IMA pre-surgery and after 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, between groups and in comparison to pre-surgery data
2 years
change in forefoot-American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)
Time Frame: 2 years
The change in forefoot-AOFAS will be evaluated, between groups and in comparison to pre-surgery
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Florian Wenzel-Schwarz, MD, Orthopädisches Spital Speising

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Hallux Shark Screw(R)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Due to sensitivity of Data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings