Effect of Large Language Model in Assisting Discharge Summary Notes Writing for Hospitalized Patients
Effect of Large Language Model in Assisting Discharge Summary Notes Writing for Hospitalized Patients: A Pilot Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
PATIENTS
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients admitted to one of three participating cardiology services at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN
Exclusion Criteria:
- Minor patients (<18)
- Patients admitted to a hospital service where CURE is not implemented
CLINICIANS
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinicians who provide care to randomized patients included in this pilot
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinicians who do not provide care to randomized patients included in this pilot
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
Clinicians who care for patients randomized to intervention will have access to CURE to assist with discharge summary writing.
|
A large language model (LLM) to help clinicians prepare discharge summaries for hospitalized patients.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Clinicians who care for patients randomized to control will continue with standard practice for discharge summary writing.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of patient accrual
Time Frame: Three months
|
The first feasibility outcome will be the rate of patient accrual.
An accrual of one patient per day will be considered acceptable, i.e., 91 patients discharged from a 91-day period who are appropriately randomized and can be included in the analyses.
|
Three months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Xiaoxi Yao, Mayo Clinic
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 24-000352
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.